-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 140
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix: Support JVM version string from old (< v8.9) and new (>= v8.9) gradle version #683
Merged
mndeveci
merged 9 commits into
aws:develop
from
jeffryang24:fix/support-old-and-new-gradle-jvm-version-label
Nov 15, 2024
Merged
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
a227030
fix(validator): support version string from old and newest gradle
jeffryang24 bf105be
fix(test): fix unit test
jeffryang24 233ea52
test: add more version and runtime to the test
jeffryang24 50e35ac
refactor(validator): use full label instead
jeffryang24 2e24e33
fix(validator): use in operator to check JVM substring
jeffryang24 5f49967
Merge branch 'develop' into fix/support-old-and-new-gradle-jvm-versio…
jeffryang24 52e30e3
Merge branch 'develop' into fix/support-old-and-new-gradle-jvm-versio…
jeffryang24 59c50a2
Merge branch 'develop' into fix/support-old-and-new-gradle-jvm-versio…
jeffryang24 e79fe74
Merge branch 'develop' into fix/support-old-and-new-gradle-jvm-versio…
mndeveci File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: This could be simplified to
l_dec.contains("JVM")
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see, I will change it with
.contains(...)
alike method, probably usex in y
style. 👍There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Updated with
in
operator to check the JVM substring.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @hnnasit , is there something that I need to do so this PR can be merged? Thank you 🙇
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @jeffryang24, our CI checks are failing consistently (and randomly out of the blue). The failures are unrelated to your changes, but we're working on fixing them. At the moment, there is no action needed from your side. Thanks for waiting
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see, noted 👍