Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

internal/ini: Add fuzzing using experimental Go1.18 fuzzer #1291

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jasdel
Copy link
Contributor

@jasdel jasdel commented Jun 7, 2021

Experiment adding fuzzing to the internal/ini module using the Go 1.18 beta fuzzer feature.

Adds fuzzing to the ini module using the Go 1.18 experimental fuzzer
feature.
jasdel added a commit to jasdel/aws-sdk-go-v2 that referenced this pull request May 11, 2022
Removes the fuzz testing files from the module, as they are invalid and
not used. PR draft aws#1291 looks
at adding fuzzing back in.

Fixes aws#1693
jasdel added a commit to jasdel/aws-sdk-go-v2 that referenced this pull request May 16, 2022
Removes the fuzz testing files from the module, as they are invalid and
not used. PR draft aws#1291 looks
at adding fuzzing back in.

Fixes aws#1693
jasdel added a commit to jasdel/aws-sdk-go-v2 that referenced this pull request May 16, 2022
Removes the fuzz testing files from the module, as they are invalid and
not used. PR draft aws#1291 looks
at adding fuzzing back in.

Fixes aws#1693

add changelog
jasdel added a commit that referenced this pull request May 16, 2022
Removes the fuzz testing files from the module, as they are invalid and
not used. PR draft #1291 looks
at adding fuzzing back in.

Fixes #1693
@github-actions
Copy link

We have noticed this issue has not received attention in 1 year. We will close this issue for now. If you think this is in error, please feel free to comment and reopen the issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants