New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add comment that describes difference between this SIPO and others #558

Open

taylor-bsg opened this issue Mar 1, 2022 · 1 comment

Assignees

Contributor

taylor-bsg commented Mar 1, 2022

basejump_stl/bsg_dataflow/bsg_serial_in_parallel_out_dynamic.v

Line 3 in 63a7c42

*

I think the difference is that this SIPO allows the sender to determine the number of words that should be dequed together?

taylor-bsg assigned gaozihou and dpetrisko

Contributor

dpetrisko commented Mar 1, 2022

https://github.com/bespoke-silicon-group/basejump_stl/blob/master/bsg_dataflow/bsg_serial_in_parallel_out.v

sender sends fixed number of flits
receiver notified on any received
reciever dequeues variable number of flits

https://github.com/bespoke-silicon-group/basejump_stl/blob/master/bsg_dataflow/bsg_serial_in_parallel_out_full.v

sender sends fixed number of flits
receiver notified on all flits received
receiver dequeues all flits at once

https://github.com/bespoke-silicon-group/basejump_stl/blob/master/bsg_dataflow/bsg_serial_in_parallel_out_dynamic.v

sender sends variable number of flits
receiver notified on flits == sender variable
receiver dequeues all flits at once

https://github.com/bespoke-silicon-group/basejump_stl/blob/master/bsg_dataflow/bsg_serial_in_parallel_out_passthrough.v

same as bsg_serial_in_parallel_out_full but with zero latency

dpetrisko pushed a commit that referenced this issue


          fix sp init value (#558)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment