Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Literate CoffeeScript is hard to read #20

Closed
RobLoach opened this issue Dec 27, 2013 · 2 comments
Closed

Literate CoffeeScript is hard to read #20

RobLoach opened this issue Dec 27, 2013 · 2 comments

Comments

@RobLoach
Copy link
Contributor

Is it just me, or does Literate CoffeeScript make the code quite unreadable?
https://github.com/bevry/projectz/blob/master/src/lib/projectz.litcoffee

I find it great for small and short scripts, but for big files like projectz.litcoffee, it makes it quite difficult to read since the indentation goes all over the place:
https://raw.github.com/bevry/projectz/master/src/lib/projectz.litcoffee

Thoughts?

@balupton
Copy link
Member

Perhaps... v1 was rewritten in es6+ so closing

@balupton balupton changed the title Literate CoffeeScript Literate CoffeeScript is unreadable Sep 16, 2015
@balupton balupton changed the title Literate CoffeeScript is unreadable Literate CoffeeScript is hard to read Sep 16, 2015
balupton added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 16, 2015
- Initial stable release
- Readme and Package files are now extension independent
- Readme sections are now outputted in HTML instead of Markdown to be
more universal
- Support SPDX licenses
	- Implements [#72](#72),
[#66](#66)
	- Fixes [#65](#65)
- Uses new [bevry/badges](https://github.com/bevry/badges) package for
badge rendering
	- Implements [#67](#67),
[#55](#55),
[#25](#25),
[#10](#10)
- Uses new [bevry/fellow](https://github.com/bevry/fellow) package for
people handling
	- Implements [#37](#37),
[#11](#11)
- Newline no longer required at start of readme file
	- Fixes [#53](#53)
- Moved from CoffeeScript to ES6+
	- Fixes [#20](#20)
@balupton
Copy link
Member

v1.0.0 resolves this

@balupton balupton reopened this Sep 16, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants