Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

updating to 0.5.0 outputs {#type} in to license #65

Closed
pflannery opened this issue Mar 1, 2015 · 4 comments
Closed

updating to 0.5.0 outputs {#type} in to license #65

pflannery opened this issue Mar 1, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

@pflannery
Copy link
Contributor

Seems now projectz 0.5.0 will now only allow two license types.
Previous versions allowed us to put our own preferred license type.

Can we keep it so that we can have custom license types in the README?

@balupton
Copy link
Member

balupton commented Mar 5, 2015

It should still allow custom license types... what is the output you are getting?

@pflannery
Copy link
Contributor Author

at the very bottom of https://github.com/pflannery/chai-v8-optimisation/blob/master/README.md I get {#type}, when I revert back to 0.4.3 it works again.

balupton added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 16, 2015
- Initial stable release
- Readme and Package files are now extension independent
- Readme sections are now outputted in HTML instead of Markdown to be
more universal
- Support SPDX licenses
	- Implements [#72](#72),
[#66](#66)
	- Fixes [#65](#65)
- Uses new [bevry/badges](https://github.com/bevry/badges) package for
badge rendering
	- Implements [#67](#67),
[#55](#55),
[#25](#25),
[#10](#10)
- Uses new [bevry/fellow](https://github.com/bevry/fellow) package for
people handling
	- Implements [#37](#37),
[#11](#11)
- Newline no longer required at start of readme file
	- Fixes [#53](#53)
- Moved from CoffeeScript to ES6+
	- Fixes [#20](#20)
@balupton
Copy link
Member

v1.0.0 resolves this

@pflannery
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants