Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - Reflect for Tonemapping and ClusterConfig #6488

Conversation

jakobhellermann
Copy link
Contributor

Objective

  • it would be useful to inspect these structs using reflection

Solution

@jakobhellermann jakobhellermann added C-Feature A new feature, making something new possible A-Reflection Runtime information about types labels Nov 5, 2022
@james7132 james7132 added the S-Ready-For-Final-Review This PR has been approved by the community. It's ready for a maintainer to consider merging it label Nov 6, 2022
@alice-i-cecile
Copy link
Member

bors r+

bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2022
# Objective

- it would be useful to inspect these structs using reflection

## Solution

- derive and register reflect
- Note that `#[reflect(Component)]` requires `Default` (or `FromWorld`) until #6060, so I implemented `Default` for `Tonemapping` with `is_enabled: false`
@bors bors bot changed the title Reflect for Tonemapping and ClusterConfig [Merged by Bors] - Reflect for Tonemapping and ClusterConfig Nov 7, 2022
@bors bors bot closed this Nov 7, 2022
ItsDoot pushed a commit to ItsDoot/bevy that referenced this pull request Feb 1, 2023
# Objective

- it would be useful to inspect these structs using reflection

## Solution

- derive and register reflect
- Note that `#[reflect(Component)]` requires `Default` (or `FromWorld`) until bevyengine#6060, so I implemented `Default` for `Tonemapping` with `is_enabled: false`
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-Reflection Runtime information about types C-Feature A new feature, making something new possible S-Ready-For-Final-Review This PR has been approved by the community. It's ready for a maintainer to consider merging it
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants