-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Replaced parking_lot
with std::sync
#9545
Replaced parking_lot
with std::sync
#9545
Conversation
Instead of panicking when a lock gets poisoned, we could just bypass poisoning entirely by using |
Didn't know about that! I'll make that change. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Generally looks good to me, but probably needs to be rebased on main.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems reasonable. Even if this doesn't provide an immediate benefit over Syd's locks, the fact that it matches performance means I think it would be good to use the standard library's solution for synchronization.
Can we look into making PRs to migrate wgpu and cpal back to std's locks?
# Objective - Fixes bevyengine#4610 ## Solution - Replaced all instances of `parking_lot` locks with equivalents from `std::sync`. Acquiring locks within `std::sync` can fail, so `.expect("Lock Poisoned")` statements were added where required. ## Comments In [this comment](bevyengine#4610 (comment)), the lack of deadlock detection was mentioned as a potential reason to not make this change. From what I can gather, Bevy doesn't appear to be using this functionality within the engine. Unless it was expected that a Bevy consumer was expected to enable and use this functionality, it appears to be a feature lost without consequence. Unfortunately, `cpal` and `wgpu` both still rely on `parking_lot`, leaving it in the dependency graph even after this change. From my basic experimentation, this change doesn't appear to have any performance impacts, positive or negative. I tested this using `bevymark` with 50,000 entities and observed 20ms of frame-time before and after the change. More extensive testing with larger/real projects should probably be done.
# Objective - Fixes bevyengine#4610 ## Solution - Replaced all instances of `parking_lot` locks with equivalents from `std::sync`. Acquiring locks within `std::sync` can fail, so `.expect("Lock Poisoned")` statements were added where required. ## Comments In [this comment](bevyengine#4610 (comment)), the lack of deadlock detection was mentioned as a potential reason to not make this change. From what I can gather, Bevy doesn't appear to be using this functionality within the engine. Unless it was expected that a Bevy consumer was expected to enable and use this functionality, it appears to be a feature lost without consequence. Unfortunately, `cpal` and `wgpu` both still rely on `parking_lot`, leaving it in the dependency graph even after this change. From my basic experimentation, this change doesn't appear to have any performance impacts, positive or negative. I tested this using `bevymark` with 50,000 entities and observed 20ms of frame-time before and after the change. More extensive testing with larger/real projects should probably be done.
# Objective - Fixes bevyengine#4610 ## Solution - Replaced all instances of `parking_lot` locks with equivalents from `std::sync`. Acquiring locks within `std::sync` can fail, so `.expect("Lock Poisoned")` statements were added where required. ## Comments In [this comment](bevyengine#4610 (comment)), the lack of deadlock detection was mentioned as a potential reason to not make this change. From what I can gather, Bevy doesn't appear to be using this functionality within the engine. Unless it was expected that a Bevy consumer was expected to enable and use this functionality, it appears to be a feature lost without consequence. Unfortunately, `cpal` and `wgpu` both still rely on `parking_lot`, leaving it in the dependency graph even after this change. From my basic experimentation, this change doesn't appear to have any performance impacts, positive or negative. I tested this using `bevymark` with 50,000 entities and observed 20ms of frame-time before and after the change. More extensive testing with larger/real projects should probably be done.
# Objective - Fixes bevyengine#4610 ## Solution - Replaced all instances of `parking_lot` locks with equivalents from `std::sync`. Acquiring locks within `std::sync` can fail, so `.expect("Lock Poisoned")` statements were added where required. ## Comments In [this comment](bevyengine#4610 (comment)), the lack of deadlock detection was mentioned as a potential reason to not make this change. From what I can gather, Bevy doesn't appear to be using this functionality within the engine. Unless it was expected that a Bevy consumer was expected to enable and use this functionality, it appears to be a feature lost without consequence. Unfortunately, `cpal` and `wgpu` both still rely on `parking_lot`, leaving it in the dependency graph even after this change. From my basic experimentation, this change doesn't appear to have any performance impacts, positive or negative. I tested this using `bevymark` with 50,000 entities and observed 20ms of frame-time before and after the change. More extensive testing with larger/real projects should probably be done.
# Objective - Fixes bevyengine#4610 ## Solution - Replaced all instances of `parking_lot` locks with equivalents from `std::sync`. Acquiring locks within `std::sync` can fail, so `.expect("Lock Poisoned")` statements were added where required. ## Comments In [this comment](bevyengine#4610 (comment)), the lack of deadlock detection was mentioned as a potential reason to not make this change. From what I can gather, Bevy doesn't appear to be using this functionality within the engine. Unless it was expected that a Bevy consumer was expected to enable and use this functionality, it appears to be a feature lost without consequence. Unfortunately, `cpal` and `wgpu` both still rely on `parking_lot`, leaving it in the dependency graph even after this change. From my basic experimentation, this change doesn't appear to have any performance impacts, positive or negative. I tested this using `bevymark` with 50,000 entities and observed 20ms of frame-time before and after the change. More extensive testing with larger/real projects should probably be done.
Objective
Solution
parking_lot
locks with equivalents fromstd::sync
. Acquiring locks withinstd::sync
can fail, so.expect("Lock Poisoned")
statements were added where required.Comments
In this comment, the lack of deadlock detection was mentioned as a potential reason to not make this change. From what I can gather, Bevy doesn't appear to be using this functionality within the engine. Unless it was expected that a Bevy consumer was expected to enable and use this functionality, it appears to be a feature lost without consequence.
Unfortunately,
cpal
andwgpu
both still rely onparking_lot
, leaving it in the dependency graph even after this change.From my basic experimentation, this change doesn't appear to have any performance impacts, positive or negative. I tested this using
bevymark
with 50,000 entities and observed 20ms of frame-time before and after the change. More extensive testing with larger/real projects should probably be done.