Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FIX] Revise template-generated coordinate systems #307

Merged

Conversation

oesteban
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR supersedes #213, and should be rebased with master after #306 is
merged.

W.r.t. master it only adds the table of Nonstandard template
identifiers

W.r.t. common-derivatives, the changes are:

  • Removed the distinction between surface templates and volumetric
    templates. After all, to properly apply a surface template one
    should first spatially normalize to a particular volumetric
    template. Although it is possible to create mixed templates
    (e.g. using MNI152Lin to generate a mapping for volumetric
    coordinates and then, say, fsLR for the surface after some
    surface mapping process), this option should be discouraged.
    Anyways, this discussion does not affect how the names of BIDS
    entities should be specified, since one can always describe how
    the template coordinates are generated with the information
    described in this PR.
  • Removed MNI152NLin6AsymConte69 because it does not define
    any new coordinate system (see
    [ENH] Derived (processed) MR data #207 (comment)),
  • Removed FS305 as it is now covered by fsaverage.
  • Reorganized subsections in "standard" vs "nonstandard" spaces.

This PR supersedes bids-standard#213, and should be rebased with master after bids-standard#306 is
merged.

W.r.t. master it only adds the table of _Nonstandard template
identifiers_

W.r.t. `common-derivatives`, the changes are:

  - [x] Removed the distinction between surface templates and volumetric
        templates. After all, to properly apply a surface template one
        should first spatially normalize to a particular volumetric
        template. Although it is possible to create mixed templates
        (e.g. using ``MNI152Lin`` to generate a mapping for volumetric
        coordinates and then, say, ``fsLR`` for the surface after some
        surface mapping process), this option should be discouraged.
        Anyways, this discussion does not affect how the names of BIDS
        entities should be specified, since one can always describe how
        the template coordinates are generated with the information
        described in this PR.
  - [x] Removed ``MNI152NLin6AsymConte69`` because it does not define
        any new coordinate system (see
        bids-standard#207 (comment)),
  - [x] Removed ``FS305`` as it is now covered by ``fsaverage``.
  - [x] Reorganized subsections in "standard" vs "nonstandard" spaces.
…stem

- [x] Describes more clearly the situation when files do not have
``space-`` definition.
- [x] Remove the ``ReferenceIndex`` as an index does not generate a
coordinate system (the concept here is mixed up with that of  image
registration, which is just a process).
@effigies
Copy link
Collaborator

effigies commented Dec 3, 2019

@oesteban Please review to make sure this is what you intended.

@bids-standard/derivatives If anybody would like to discuss these changes, I would ask that you do so in the next two days. After that, any further discussion should happen in #265.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@oesteban oesteban left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 to your merge, @effigies

@effigies effigies merged commit dd626c1 into bids-standard:common-derivatives Dec 5, 2019
@effigies
Copy link
Collaborator

effigies commented Dec 5, 2019

Squashed to avoid a tangle of merge commits.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants