2024.4

[PauAndrio]

Describe your pull request here

---

Please read the guidelines for Bioconda recipes before opening a pull request (PR).

General instructions

• If this PR adds or updates a recipe, use "Add" or "Update" appropriately as the first word in its title.
• New recipes not directly relevant to the biological sciences need to be submitted to the conda-forge channel instead of Bioconda.
• PRs require reviews prior to being merged. Once your PR is passing tests and ready to be merged, please issue the @BiocondaBot please add label command.
• Please post questions on Gitter or ping @bioconda/core in a comment.

Instructions for avoiding API, ABI, and CLI breakage issues

Conda is able to record and lock (a.k.a. pin) dependency versions used at build time of other recipes.
This way, one can avoid that expectations of a downstream recipe with regards to API, ABI, or CLI are violated by later changes in the recipe.
If not already present in the meta.yaml, make sure to specify run_exports (see here for the rationale and comprehensive explanation).
Add a run_exports section like this:

build:
  run_exports:
    - ...

with ... being one of:

Case	run_exports statement
semantic versioning	{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x") }}
semantic versioning (0.x.x)	{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x") }}
known breakage in minor versions	{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x") }} (in such a case, please add a note that shortly mentions your evidence for that)
known breakage in patch versions	{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x.x") }} (in such a case, please add a note that shortly mentions your evidence for that)
calendar versioning	{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin=None) }}

while replacing "myrecipe" with either name if a name|lower variable is defined in your recipe or with the lowercase name of the package in quotes.

Bot commands for PR management

Please use the following BiocondaBot commands:

Everyone has access to the following BiocondaBot commands, which can be given in a comment:

@BiocondaBot please update	Merge the master branch into a PR.
@BiocondaBot please add label	Add the please review & merge label.
@BiocondaBot please fetch artifacts	Post links to CI-built packages/containers. You can use this to test packages locally.

Note that the @BiocondaBot please merge command is now depreciated. Please just squash and merge instead.

Also, the bot watches for comments from non-members that include @bioconda/<team> and will automatically re-post them to notify the addressed <team>.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated the version of the biobb_structure_checking package to 3.13.5.
  • Revised the SHA256 checksum for the source tarball.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the meta.yaml file for the biobb_structure_checking package. The version number has been incremented from "3.13.4" to "3.13.5", and the SHA256 checksum for the source tarball has been modified to reflect this new version. No other changes to the package structure or content were made.

Changes

File	Change Summary
recipes/biobb_structure_checking/meta.yaml	Updated version from "3.13.4" to "3.13.5" and SHA256 checksum from d819819d13c7ad219411b70b043555dcd65d5535f696a1121db562646931f445 to 4ba074da556a7aecac215f2020a04274c05f155413ed467177b9c9f31a53d4d0.

Poem

In the garden of code, a change took flight,
A version anew, shining bright!
With checksums updated, we hop with glee,
For biobb_structure_checking, as fine as can be!
🐇✨

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)

recipes/biobb_structure_checking/meta.yaml (1)

Line range hint 1-67: PR title should be updated to follow Bioconda guidelines.

While the recipe update itself looks good and adheres to Bioconda guidelines, the PR title "2024.4" doesn't follow the recommended format. As per the PR objectives, the title should start with "Update" for package updates.

Suggested PR title: "Update biobb_structure_checking to 3.13.5"

Other observations:

1. The package is appropriately related to biological sciences, making it suitable for Bioconda.
2. The inclusion of run_exports in the recipe is good practice and aligns with the recommendations in the PR objectives.

@PauAndrio Could you please update the PR title to follow the Bioconda guidelines?

🧰 Tools

🪛 yamllint

[error] 1-1: syntax error: found character '%' that cannot start any token

(syntax)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d6403ea and 37ccf7c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• recipes/biobb_structure_checking/meta.yaml (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (3)

recipes/biobb_structure_checking/meta.yaml (3)

2-2: Version update looks good.

The version has been correctly updated from 3.13.4 to 3.13.5, which is consistent with a minor patch update.

---

Line range hint 1-67: No other unexpected changes detected.

I've reviewed the entire file, and I can confirm that no other unexpected changes were made. This is good practice for a version bump, as it minimizes the risk of unintended side effects.

🧰 Tools

🪛 yamllint

[error] 1-1: syntax error: found character '%' that cannot start any token

(syntax)

---

10-10: SHA256 checksum has been updated.

The SHA256 checksum has been updated, which is expected with a new version release. However, it's crucial to verify that this checksum corresponds to the correct source package for version 3.13.5.

Please run the following script to verify the checksum:

[BiocondaBot]

No artifacts found on the most recent builds. Either the builds failed, the artifacts have been removed due to age, or the recipe was blacklisted/skipped.