Update gmap to 2024-10-10 #51341
Update gmap to 2024-10-10 #51341
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to two primary files: Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
recipes/gmap/build.sh (1)
Line range hint
44-68: Shebang line fixes and cleanup are good, but consider optimization.The sed commands to fix shebang lines in Perl scripts and the subsequent removal of backup files are good practices. They ensure that all scripts use the correct interpreter and clean up temporary files.
However, the repetitive nature of these commands suggests an opportunity for optimization. Consider using a loop to perform these operations more efficiently:
for script in ${PREFIX}/bin/*.pl ${PREFIX}/bin/gmap_build ${PREFIX}/bin/gmap_process; do sed -i.bak '1 s|^.*$|#!/usr/bin/env perl|g' "$script" done rm -f ${PREFIX}/bin/*.bakThis approach would be more maintainable and less prone to errors if new scripts are added in the future.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- recipes/gmap/build.sh (2 hunks)
- recipes/gmap/meta.yaml (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- recipes/gmap/meta.yaml
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
recipes/gmap/build.sh (3)
40-40: Improved SIMD level configuration.The addition of quotes around
${SIMD_LEVEL}in the--with-simd-leveloption is a good practice. This change ensures that the value is correctly interpreted even if it contains spaces or special characters, improving the robustness of the script.
Line range hint
1-68: Overall, the changes improve the build script, with some areas for consideration.The modifications to this build script generally enhance its robustness and maintainability. Key improvements include:
- More robust conditional syntax for OS detection.
- Better handling of the SIMD level configuration.
- Consistent updating of shebang lines in Perl scripts.
However, there are a few points to consider:
- The change in compiler flags to suppress warnings about deprecated non-prototype functions needs explanation and possibly a plan for addressing these in the future.
- The repetitive sed commands could be optimized for better maintainability.
These considerations aside, the script appears to be in good shape for building the GMAP package across different environments.
12-15: Improved conditional syntax, but compiler flag change needs clarification.The update to double brackets
[[ ]]for the conditional check is a good practice, as it's more robust and less prone to errors.However, the change in the compiler flag from
-Wdeprecated-non-prototypeto-Wno-deprecated-non-prototypeneeds explanation:
- Why are we now suppressing warnings about deprecated non-prototype functions instead of addressing them?
- Are there specific compatibility issues that necessitate this change?
- Is there a plan to address these deprecated functions in the future?
To understand the impact of this change, let's check for any occurrences of non-prototype functions in the codebase:
Describe your pull request here
Please read the guidelines for Bioconda recipes before opening a pull request (PR).
General instructions
@BiocondaBot please add labelcommand.@bioconda/corein a comment.Instructions for avoiding API, ABI, and CLI breakage issues
Conda is able to record and lock (a.k.a. pin) dependency versions used at build time of other recipes.
This way, one can avoid that expectations of a downstream recipe with regards to API, ABI, or CLI are violated by later changes in the recipe.
If not already present in the meta.yaml, make sure to specify
run_exports(see here for the rationale and comprehensive explanation).Add a
run_exportssection like this:with
...being one of:{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x") }}{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x") }}{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x") }}(in such a case, please add a note that shortly mentions your evidence for that){{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x.x") }}(in such a case, please add a note that shortly mentions your evidence for that){{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin=None) }}while replacing
"myrecipe"with eithernameif aname|lowervariable is defined in your recipe or with the lowercase name of the package in quotes.Bot commands for PR management
Please use the following BiocondaBot commands:
Everyone has access to the following BiocondaBot commands, which can be given in a comment:
@BiocondaBot please update@BiocondaBot please add labelplease review & mergelabel.@BiocondaBot please fetch artifactsYou can use this to test packages locally.
Note that the
@BiocondaBot please mergecommand is now depreciated. Please just squash and merge instead.Also, the bot watches for comments from non-members that include
@bioconda/<team>and will automatically re-post them to notify the addressed<team>.