Update pyopal to 0.7.0 #51907
Update pyopal to 0.7.0 #51907
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@mencian has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 8 minutes and 45 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces updates to the Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
recipes/pyopal/meta.yaml (1)
Update scoring-matrices dependency constraint to match PyPI requirements
The PyPI metadata shows that pyopal 0.7.0 requires
scoring-matrices~=0.3.0, but the recipe specifiesscoring-matrices >=0.2. This could lead to compatibility issues. The constraint should be updated to:host: - scoring-matrices ~=0.3.0🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
19-31: Verify dependency compatibility with new versionThe dependencies remain unchanged. Let's verify there are no new requirements introduced in the 0.7.0 release.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any dependency changes in the new version # Download package metadata from PyPI for both versions echo "Comparing dependencies between versions..." curl -s "https://pypi.org/pypi/pyopal/0.6.1/json" | jq -r '.info.requires_dist[]' | sort > old_deps.txt curl -s "https://pypi.org/pypi/pyopal/0.7.0/json" | jq -r '.info.requires_dist[]' | sort > new_deps.txt diff old_deps.txt new_deps.txt || echo "No dependency changes found" rm old_deps.txt new_deps.txtLength of output: 516
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: found character '%' that cannot start any token
(syntax)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
recipes/pyopal/meta.yaml(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
recipes/pyopal/meta.yaml (3)
2-2: LGTM: Version bump follows semantic versioning
The version update from 0.6.1 to 0.7.0 is correctly formatted and matches the PR objectives.
13-13: LGTM: Build number correctly reset
The build number has been properly reset to 0 for the new version, following conda-build best practices.
10-10: Verify SHA256 checksum against PyPI source
Let's verify that the SHA256 checksum matches the source tarball from PyPI.
✅ Verification successful
SHA256 checksum verified successfully
The SHA256 checksum in meta.yaml (690b46fb158f10c663e14cf51a50060a27adb51e113ed1cdfbe50b4b9b1d7689) matches exactly with the SHA256 digest from PyPI for pyopal-0.7.0.tar.gz.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify SHA256 checksum matches PyPI source
# Download package JSON from PyPI
curl -s "https://pypi.org/pypi/pyopal/0.7.0/json" | \
jq -r '.urls[] | select(.packagetype=="sdist") | .digests.sha256' | \
grep -q "690b46fb158f10c663e14cf51a50060a27adb51e113ed1cdfbe50b4b9b1d7689" && \
echo "✓ SHA256 checksum verified against PyPI source" || \
echo "✗ SHA256 checksum mismatch"
Length of output: 636
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify the SHA256 checksum
# First, let's get the source URL and expected SHA256 from meta.yaml
echo "=== Package details from meta.yaml ==="
cat recipes/pyopal/meta.yaml
echo -e "\n=== PyPI package information ==="
# Get the SHA256 from PyPI for version 0.7.0
curl -s "https://pypi.org/pypi/pyopal/0.7.0/json" | \
jq -r '.urls[] | select(.packagetype=="sdist") | {url: .url, sha256: .digests.sha256}'
Length of output: 1699
Update
pyopal: 0.6.1 → 0.7.0recipes/pyopal(click to view/edit other files)This pull request was automatically generated (see docs).