-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 294
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor prepare proposal to efficiently fill the square #224
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
25 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
136d617
refactor prepare proposal to efficiently fill the square
evan-forbes bb49e54
fix tests by sorting messages
evan-forbes 1da4870
estimate square size and move erasure step to the app
evan-forbes e6a3585
fix prepare and process proposal tests
evan-forbes 888d7a6
fix tests
evan-forbes 063142f
linter
evan-forbes c49feca
use tagged version of celestia-core instead of commit
evan-forbes c4b7d60
clean up todos and remove panic
evan-forbes 9e99916
update docs
evan-forbes 8050630
fix remaining test
evan-forbes ec36e5d
linter
evan-forbes 35fcff5
rename after rebase
evan-forbes 266a1fb
WriteSquare -> splitshares
evan-forbes 26861b9
WriteSquare -> splitshares
evan-forbes 4e642c9
use correct function name for documentation
evan-forbes 160c8dc
wording
evan-forbes 3fbc45e
log errors better
evan-forbes d7be2b3
fix comment
evan-forbes ac75bde
remove ISRs from the share splitter
evan-forbes 9dc8d12
improve comment
evan-forbes ff5a678
typo
evan-forbes c77ea6e
use a clearer method of calculating the delim length
evan-forbes a17beb0
use a switch statement instead of confusing if statement flow
evan-forbes efdf2d6
Merge branch 'evan/prepare-prop-refactor' of https://github.com/celes…
evan-forbes a063a95
fix wording
evan-forbes File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice. So this is not done in core at all anymore, right? I'm wondering if we should move some of the code that is currently in core to this repo actually 🤔
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I looked into this, but atm I think its best to keep it there. This is mainly because it makes it easier to test things. This could be a good goal for our next upgrade tho.