Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cephfs: skip expand for BackingSnapshot volume (backport #3586) #3587

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 21, 2022

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Dec 21, 2022

This is an automatic backport of pull request #3586 done by Mergify.


Mergify commands and options

More conditions and actions can be found in the documentation.

You can also trigger Mergify actions by commenting on this pull request:

  • @Mergifyio refresh will re-evaluate the rules
  • @Mergifyio rebase will rebase this PR on its base branch
  • @Mergifyio update will merge the base branch into this PR
  • @Mergifyio backport <destination> will backport this PR on <destination> branch

Additionally, on Mergify dashboard you can:

  • look at your merge queues
  • generate the Mergify configuration with the config editor.

Finally, you can contact us on https://mergify.com

We should not call ExpandVolume for the BackingSnapshot
subvolume as there wont be any real subvolume created for
it and even if we call it the ExpandVolume will fail
fail as there is no real subvolume exists.

This commits fixes by adjusting the `if` check to ensure
that ExpandVolume will only be called either the
VolumeRequest is to create from a snapshot or volume
and BackingSnapshot is not true.

sample code here https://go.dev/play/p/PI2tNii5tTg

Signed-off-by: Madhu Rajanna <madhupr007@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit f779608)
@mergify mergify bot added the component/cephfs Issues related to CephFS label Dec 21, 2022
@Madhu-1 Madhu-1 requested a review from a team December 21, 2022 12:36
@Madhu-1 Madhu-1 added ready-to-merge This PR is ready to be merged and it doesn't need second review (backports only) ok-to-test Label to trigger E2E tests labels Dec 21, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link

/test ci/centos/k8s-e2e-external-storage/1.23

@github-actions
Copy link

/test ci/centos/k8s-e2e-external-storage/1.24

@github-actions
Copy link

/test ci/centos/k8s-e2e-external-storage/1.25

@github-actions
Copy link

/test ci/centos/mini-e2e-helm/k8s-1.23

@github-actions
Copy link

/test ci/centos/mini-e2e-helm/k8s-1.24

@github-actions
Copy link

/test ci/centos/mini-e2e-helm/k8s-1.25

@github-actions
Copy link

/test ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.23

@github-actions
Copy link

/test ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.24

@github-actions
Copy link

/test ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.25

@github-actions
Copy link

/test ci/centos/upgrade-tests-cephfs

@github-actions
Copy link

/test ci/centos/upgrade-tests-rbd

@mergify mergify bot added ok-to-test Label to trigger E2E tests and removed ok-to-test Label to trigger E2E tests labels Dec 21, 2022
@mergify mergify bot merged commit 27d0d3c into release-v3.7 Dec 21, 2022
@mergify mergify bot removed the ok-to-test Label to trigger E2E tests label Dec 21, 2022
@mergify mergify bot deleted the mergify/bp/release-v3.7/pr-3586 branch December 21, 2022 14:15
@github-actions
Copy link

/test ci/centos/k8s-e2e-external-storage/1.23

@github-actions
Copy link

/test ci/centos/k8s-e2e-external-storage/1.24

@github-actions
Copy link

/test ci/centos/k8s-e2e-external-storage/1.25

@github-actions
Copy link

/test ci/centos/mini-e2e-helm/k8s-1.23

@github-actions
Copy link

/test ci/centos/mini-e2e-helm/k8s-1.24

@github-actions
Copy link

/test ci/centos/mini-e2e-helm/k8s-1.25

@github-actions
Copy link

/test ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.23

@github-actions
Copy link

/test ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.24

@github-actions
Copy link

/test ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.25

@github-actions
Copy link

/test ci/centos/upgrade-tests-cephfs

@github-actions
Copy link

/test ci/centos/upgrade-tests-rbd

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
component/cephfs Issues related to CephFS ready-to-merge This PR is ready to be merged and it doesn't need second review (backports only)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant