-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 584
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rename files #533
Rename files #533
Conversation
91d5a20
to
d27eaf3
Compare
CI errors are expected until merged. |
LGTM |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Overall LGTM
I suggested some change of wording, that could also go into a separate PR, if you want to restrict this one to simple renaming.
amqp-protocol-binding.md
Outdated
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ This document is a working draft. | |||
|
|||
## 1. Introduction | |||
|
|||
[CloudEvents][ce] is a standardized and transport-neutral definition of the | |||
[CloudEvents][ce] is a standardized and protocol-neutral definition of the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wonder, if protocol-agnostic sounds better, but I leave it up to you.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok I got all of these in all of the files
avro-format.md
Outdated
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ This document is a working draft. | |||
|
|||
## 1. Introduction | |||
|
|||
[CloudEvents][ce] is a standardized and transport-neutral definition of the | |||
[CloudEvents][ce] is a standardized and protocol-neutral definition of the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same as above
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
done
@@ -35,8 +35,8 @@ those events. | |||
The partitionkey attribute extension uses the key `partitionkey` for | |||
in-memory formats. | |||
|
|||
### Transport format | |||
### Protocol format |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure if in-memory format vs. protocol format are still the right categories. What about stand-alone event format and protocol binding? Or structured-mode message vs. binary-mode message?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This feels like more than a syntax fix so I'd prefer to leave that for a follow-on PR - if you want to open that one up
Signed-off-by: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
Got 2 LGTMs and since this is just syntax fixes I'm going to merge. If anyone thinks there's something I missed or that a change was made incorrectly please raise an issue and we'll address it immediately. |
if #521 and #529 go in, then rename for consistency
Just look at the last commit to see the changes specific to this PR and not #521 and #529