Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PoolGauge.withdraw() can be optimized when _value equals zero #47

Open
code423n4 opened this issue Nov 6, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

PoolGauge.withdraw() can be optimized when _value equals zero #47

code423n4 opened this issue Nov 6, 2021 · 0 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working G (Gas Optimization) sponsor confirmed Sponsor agrees this is a problem and intends to fix it (OK to use w/ "disagree with severity")

Comments

@code423n4
Copy link
Contributor

Handle

pants

Vulnerability details

The function PoolGauge.withdraw() doesn't have to execute these lines of code when _value equals zero:

_balance: uint256 = self.balanceOf[msg.sender] - _value
_supply: uint256 = self.totalSupply - _value
self.balanceOf[msg.sender] = _balance
self.totalSupply = _supply

self._update_liquidity_limit(msg.sender, _balance, _supply)

assert ERC20(self.lp_token).transfer(msg.sender, _value)

Impact

There is no reason to execute these lines of code if _value equals zero because they won't affect the system. An identical optimization is already implemented in PoolGauge.deposit().

Tool Used

Manual code review.

Recommended Mitigation Steps

Execute these lines of code only if _value doesn't equal zero.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working G (Gas Optimization) sponsor confirmed Sponsor agrees this is a problem and intends to fix it (OK to use w/ "disagree with severity")
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants