Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Unused function parameter #84

Closed
code423n4 opened this issue Dec 3, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed

Unused function parameter #84

code423n4 opened this issue Dec 3, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
1 (Low Risk) Assets are not at risk. State handling, function incorrect as to spec, issues with comments bug Something isn't working duplicate This issue or pull request already exists

Comments

@code423n4
Copy link
Contributor

Handle

pedroais

Vulnerability details

Proof of Concept

The function update stream internal uses an address "who" as input but it's never used inside the function.
@code423n4 code423n4 added 0 (Non-critical) Code style, clarity, syntax, versioning, off-chain monitoring (events etc), exclude gas optimisation bug Something isn't working labels Dec 3, 2021
code423n4 added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 3, 2021
@code423n4
pedroais issue #84
0f922d1
@0xean 0xean added 1 (Low Risk) Assets are not at risk. State handling, function incorrect as to spec, issues with comments duplicate This issue or pull request already exists and removed 0 (Non-critical) Code style, clarity, syntax, versioning, off-chain monitoring (events etc), exclude gas optimisation labels Jan 16, 2022
@0xean
Copy link
Collaborator

0xean commented Jan 16, 2022

dupe of #125

@0xean 0xean closed this as completed Jan 16, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
1 (Low Risk) Assets are not at risk. State handling, function incorrect as to spec, issues with comments bug Something isn't working duplicate This issue or pull request already exists
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@0xean @code423n4