replace "First name" and "Surname" input fields with a single "Full Name" field #1084
Conversation
|
@sahilpatel2712 is attempting to deploy a commit to the Codú Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve a restructuring of user input fields in the onboarding form. Specifically, the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
Hello @sahilpatel2712, thanks for opening your first Pull Request. The maintainers will review this Pull Request and provide feedback as soon as possible. Keep up the great work! |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
app/(app)/alpha/additional-details/page.tsx (1)
31-31: LGTM! Consider using nullish coalescing for consistency.The change from separate
firstNameandsurnamefields to a singlenamefield in thedetailsWithNullsRemovedobject is correct and aligns with the PR objectives.For consistency with modern JavaScript practices, consider using the nullish coalescing operator (
??) instead of the logical OR (||). This change would make the code more explicit about handlingnullandundefinedvalues:- name: details?.name || "", + name: details?.name ?? "",This suggestion applies to all similar lines in the
detailsWithNullsRemovedobject for consistency.schema/additionalUserDetails.ts (1)
4-8: Consider cultural inclusivity in name handlingWhile a single
namefield simplifies the input process, it might not accommodate various cultural naming conventions effectively. Some cultures have different name structures that might not fit well into a single field.Consider the following options:
- Keep the current single
namefield but add a note explaining that users should enter their full name as they prefer it to be displayed.- Provide optional separate fields for different name components (e.g., given name, family name, middle name) in addition to the full name field, allowing users to input their names in a way that best suits their cultural background.
This approach would enhance cultural inclusivity and provide more flexibility in name handling throughout the application.
app/(app)/alpha/additional-details/_actions.ts (1)
26-26: Consider the impact on name display and usage.The change to a single 'name' field may affect how names are displayed or used throughout the application. Consider reviewing and updating any code that relies on separate first name and surname fields, such as user profiles, email templates, or admin interfaces.
Would you like assistance in identifying potential areas that might need updates due to this change?
Also applies to: 31-31
app/(app)/alpha/additional-details/_client.tsx (2)
45-45: LGTM! Consider updating related documentation.The change from separate
firstNameandsurnamefields to a singlenamefield in theUserDetailstype aligns with the PR objective. This modification simplifies the data structure and is consistent throughout the component.Consider updating any related documentation or API specifications to reflect this change in the
UserDetailstype.
103-103: LGTM! Consider adding an aria-label for improved accessibility.The changes in the
SlideOnecomponent correctly implement the new "Full Name" field, including updates to destructuring, default values, and form structure. The error handling has been appropriately adjusted for the new field.For improved accessibility, consider adding an
aria-labelto the input field:<Input id="full-name" placeholder="Enter full name" invalid={!!errors?.name} + aria-label="Full Name" {...register("name")} />Also applies to: 111-111, 140-149
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- app/(app)/alpha/additional-details/_actions.ts (1 hunks)
- app/(app)/alpha/additional-details/_client.tsx (5 hunks)
- app/(app)/alpha/additional-details/page.tsx (2 hunks)
- schema/additionalUserDetails.ts (1 hunks)
- server/db/schema.ts (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- server/db/schema.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (7)
app/(app)/alpha/additional-details/page.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-43: Summary: Changes successfully implement the 'Full Name' field consolidation.The modifications in this file accurately reflect the PR objective of replacing separate 'First name' and 'Surname' fields with a single 'Full Name' field. The changes are minimal, focused, and maintain the overall structure and logic of the component.
Key points:
- The database query now fetches the
namefield instead offirstNameandsurname.- The
detailsWithNullsRemovedobject correctly handles the newnamefield.- These changes are consistent throughout the file and align with the AI-generated summary.
The implementation looks good, and no further changes are necessary for this file.
schema/additionalUserDetails.ts (1)
Line range hint
21-70: Verify compatibility of unchanged schemasWhile
slideTwoSchemaandslideThreeSchemaremain unchanged, it's important to ensure they are still compatible with the modifications made toslideOneSchema.Please run the following script to check for any dependencies between the schemas:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for dependencies between schemas echo "Checking for dependencies between schemas:" rg --type typescript --type javascript 'slideOneSchema|slideTwoSchema|slideThreeSchema' -C 5Review the results to ensure that the unchanged schemas don't rely on the removed
firstNameorsurnamefields, and that any code using these schemas together is updated accordingly.app/(app)/alpha/additional-details/_actions.ts (3)
Line range hint
47-114: LGTM: No changes to slideTwoSubmitAction and slideThreeSubmitAction.The
slideTwoSubmitActionandslideThreeSubmitActionfunctions remain unchanged, which is consistent with the PR objective of only modifying the name-related fields.
26-26: Verify schema validation for the 'name' field.Ensure that the
slideOneSchemahas been updated to validate the new 'name' field instead of separate 'firstName' and 'surname' fields.Run the following script to check the schema definition:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the slideOneSchema definition # Test: Check slideOneSchema definition echo "Checking slideOneSchema definition:" rg 'const slideOneSchema = z.object' -A 10 --type ts
26-26: LGTM: Changes align with PR objective.The modifications to use a single
namefield instead of separatefirstNameandsurnamefields are consistent with the PR's goal of replacing 'First name' and 'Surname' input fields with a single 'Full Name' field.To ensure consistency across the codebase, please run the following script:
Also applies to: 31-31
app/(app)/alpha/additional-details/_client.tsx (2)
65-65: LGTM! Consistent updates to component logic.The changes in the
AdditionalSignUpDetailscomponent correctly reflect the modification of theUserDetailstype. The destructuring and slide determination logic have been updated to use the newnamefield, ensuring consistency with the new data structure.Also applies to: 76-76
Line range hint
1-577: Overall, excellent implementation of the 'Full Name' field change.The changes in this file consistently implement the replacement of 'First name' and 'Surname' fields with a single 'Full Name' field. The modifications are well-executed across the
UserDetailstype,AdditionalSignUpDetailscomponent, andSlideOnecomponent. The code remains clean, maintainable, and aligns perfectly with the PR objectives.Great job on maintaining consistency throughout the file and ensuring that all related logic was updated accordingly.
| @@ -13,8 +13,7 @@ export default async function Page() { | |||
| const details = await db.query.user.findFirst({ | |||
| columns: { | |||
| username: true, | |||
| firstName: true, | |||
| surname: true, | |||
| name: true, | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Remaining references to firstName and surname found. Please update all instances to use the new name field.
app/(app)/alpha/settings/profile.tscontains references tofirstNameandsurname.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Verify database schema consistency.
The change from separate firstName and surname fields to a single name field in the database query aligns with the PR objectives. This modification correctly reflects the consolidation of user name information.
To ensure consistency across the codebase, please run the following script to verify that all references to firstName and surname have been updated:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This can be safely ignored, since this alpha/settings page is legacy and will be deleted.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@John-Paul-Larkin, understood. I'll note that the app/(app)/alpha/settings page is legacy and will be deleted.
(_/)
(._.)
/
✏️ Learnings added
Learnt from: John-Paul-Larkin
PR: codu-code/codu#1084
File: app/(app)/alpha/additional-details/page.tsx:16-16
Timestamp: 2024-10-07T18:36:02.876Z
Learning: The `app/(app)/alpha/settings` page is legacy and will be deleted.
Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of similar code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure review instructions. You can manage existing learnings in the app.
schema/additionalUserDetails.ts
Outdated
| name: z | ||
| .string() | ||
| .trim() | ||
| .min(2, "Min name length is 2 characters.") | ||
| .max(50, "Max name length is 50 characters."), | ||
| surname: z | ||
| .string() | ||
| .trim() | ||
| .min(2, "Min name length is 2 characters.") | ||
| .min(1, "Min name length is 1 characters.") | ||
| .max(50, "Max name length is 50 characters."), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider adjusting the minimum length for the name field
The current minimum length of 1 character for the name field might be too permissive for a full name. This could potentially allow invalid or incomplete name entries.
Consider increasing the minimum length to ensure more meaningful name entries. For example:
- .min(1, "Min name length is 1 characters.")
+ .min(2, "Min name length is 2 characters.")Additionally, you might want to consider adding a regex pattern to ensure the name contains at least two words for a full name, similar to the username field.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| name: z | |
| .string() | |
| .trim() | |
| .min(2, "Min name length is 2 characters.") | |
| .max(50, "Max name length is 50 characters."), | |
| surname: z | |
| .string() | |
| .trim() | |
| .min(2, "Min name length is 2 characters.") | |
| .min(1, "Min name length is 1 characters.") | |
| .max(50, "Max name length is 50 characters."), | |
| name: z | |
| .string() | |
| .trim() | |
| .min(2, "Min name length is 2 characters.") | |
| .max(50, "Max name length is 50 characters."), |
💡 Codebase verification
Issues Found:
firstNameandsurnameare still referenced inapp/(app)/alpha/settings/profile.ts.
Please update all occurrences of firstName and surname to use the new name field to ensure consistency and prevent potential bugs.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify impact on existing data and functionality
The change from separate firstName and surname fields to a single name field might affect existing data structures and functionality throughout the application.
Please run the following script to check for any other occurrences of firstName or surname in the codebase that might need updating:
Ensure that all relevant parts of the application are updated to use the new name field instead of firstName and surname.
Apologies for the errors in the previous script. Let's run a corrected script to search for occurrences of firstName and surname in the codebase:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for occurrences of firstName and surname in the codebase
echo "Checking for 'firstName' occurrences:"
rg --type typescript --type javascript 'firstName'
echo "Checking for 'surname' occurrences:"
rg --type typescript --type javascript 'surname'
Length of output: 318
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for occurrences of firstName and surname in the codebase
echo "Checking for 'firstName' occurrences in .ts and .js files:"
rg 'firstName' --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.js'
echo "Checking for 'surname' occurrences in .ts and .js files:"
rg 'surname' --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.js'
Length of output: 445
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks great @sahilpatel2712
One last thing. Could you please drop the firstName and surname columns from the database schema since we’re using fullname instead. You can modify the migration accordingly.
Thanks
|
sure... |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
drizzle/0008_remove_firstName_and_surname.sql (1)
1-2: LGTM! Consider adding the new 'name' column in this migration.The SQL statements to drop the "firstName" and "surname" columns are correct and align with the PR objectives. The use of "IF EXISTS" is a good practice to prevent errors if the columns don't exist.
However, I noticed that this migration doesn't add a new "name" or "fullName" column to replace the dropped columns. Consider adding this column in the same migration to ensure data consistency.
Here's a suggestion to add the new column:
ALTER TABLE "user" ADD COLUMN "fullName" TEXT;You might want to add this line after the existing ALTER TABLE statements.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
drizzle/meta/0008_snapshot.jsonis excluded by!**/*.jsondrizzle/meta/_journal.jsonis excluded by!**/*.json
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- drizzle/0008_remove_firstName_and_surname.sql (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
You're welcome! |
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
Just some prettier issues. Run |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
app/(app)/alpha/additional-details/_client.tsx (2)
65-65: LGTM: AdditionalSignUpDetails component updated to use 'name' field.The changes in destructuring and slide determination logic are consistent with the updated UserDetails type. This ensures that the component works correctly with the new structure.
Consider using optional chaining for a more concise condition check:
- } else if (!name || !username || !location) { + } else if (!details?.name || !details?.username || !details?.location) {This change would make the code more robust against potential undefined values in the
detailsobject.Also applies to: 76-76
103-103: LGTM: SlideOne component updated to use single 'Full Name' field.The changes in the SlideOne component are consistent with the updated UserDetails type and the PR objective. The form has been correctly updated to use a single 'Full Name' field, including appropriate error handling.
To improve accessibility, consider adding an
aria-describedbyattribute to the input field and an associated description:<Input id="full-name" placeholder="Enter full name" invalid={!!errors?.name} + aria-describedby="full-name-description" {...register("name")} /> +<span id="full-name-description" className="sr-only"> + Enter your full name, including first name and surname +</span>This change would provide more context to screen reader users about the expected input format.
Also applies to: 111-111, 140-149
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- app/(app)/alpha/additional-details/_client.tsx (5 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
app/(app)/alpha/additional-details/_client.tsx (2)
Line range hint
1-577: Overall assessment: Changes successfully implement the 'Full Name' field consolidation.The modifications in this file effectively replace the separate 'firstName' and 'surname' fields with a single 'name' field, aligning with the PR objective. The changes are consistently applied across the UserDetails type and the SlideOne component, with appropriate updates to form handling and error management.
Key points:
- UserDetails type has been updated to use a single 'name' field.
- AdditionalSignUpDetails component now correctly uses the 'name' field for slide determination.
- SlideOne component has been refactored to use a 'Full Name' input field.
- Other components (SlideTwo and SlideThree) remain unaffected, as they don't directly interact with the name fields.
The localized nature of these changes minimizes the potential for unintended side effects in other parts of the codebase. However, it's crucial to ensure that any other components or functions relying on the UserDetails type are updated accordingly.
To ensure comprehensive coverage of this change, please run the following verification script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of UserDetails type change across the codebase # Search for any remaining usage of 'firstName' or 'surname' in relation to user details echo "Searching for potential missed updates:" rg -t ts -t jsx -i '(firstname|surname).*?(user|profile|details?)' # Search for any components or functions that might still expect separate name fields echo "Checking for components or functions that might need updating:" rg -t ts -t jsx '\b(firstName|surname)\b.*?(props|interface|type|UserDetails)' # Note: Manually review the results to identify any areas that might need further updates
45-45: LGTM: UserDetails type updated to use a single 'name' field.The change aligns with the PR objective of consolidating 'firstName' and 'surname' into a single 'name' field. This simplification is a good approach for streamlining user input.
To ensure this change doesn't introduce any breaking changes in the codebase, please run the following verification script:
done.. |
✨ Codu Pull Request 💻
Fixes issue #1080
Pull Request details
Any Breaking changes
'None'
Associated Screenshots