split name field into first and last name #833
Conversation
|
@John-Paul-Larkin is attempting to deploy a commit to the Codú Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
WalkthroughThe recent update to the application introduces the Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 1
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (2)
- app/(app)/settings/_client.tsx (1 hunks)
- app/(app)/settings/page.tsx (2 hunks)
Additional comments: 4
app/(app)/settings/page.tsx (3)
- 20-21: Adding
firstNameandsurnameto the selection set is a necessary change to support the new fields in the user model. This aligns with the PR objectives to split thenamefield intofirstNameandsurname.- 32-65: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [62-92]
The logic for generating a username if not present is well-implemented, using a custom alphabet and ensuring the username is cleaned and normalized. This is a good practice to avoid issues with special characters and spaces. However, ensure that the generated username does not conflict with existing usernames in the database. A uniqueness check might be necessary to prevent potential conflicts.
Implement a uniqueness check for the generated username to ensure it does not conflict with existing usernames.
- 17-24: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [93-109]
The error handling in the newsletter subscription check is correctly implemented, using Sentry to capture exceptions. This is a good practice for monitoring and debugging issues in production environments. However, consider providing a more informative error message to the user in case of failure, rather than just returning the user profile without the newsletter subscription status.
Consider enhancing the user experience by providing a more informative error message in case of failure to check the newsletter subscription status.
app/(app)/settings/_client.tsx (1)
- 23-24: Adding
firstNameandsurnameto theUsertype is a necessary change to support the new fields in the user model. This aligns with the PR objectives to split thenamefield intofirstNameandsurname. The implementation correctly updates the type to include these new fields.
| if (user && user.name && !user?.firstName && !user?.surname) { | ||
| const trimmedName = user.name.trim(); | ||
| const nameParts = trimmedName.split(" "); | ||
|
|
||
| if (nameParts.length > 1) { | ||
| const surname = nameParts.pop(); | ||
| const firstName = nameParts.join(" "); | ||
|
|
||
| user = await prisma.user.update({ | ||
| where: { | ||
| id: session.user.id, | ||
| }, | ||
| data: { | ||
| firstName, | ||
| surname, | ||
| }, | ||
| select, | ||
| }); | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The logic for splitting the name field into firstName and surname is correctly implemented, with appropriate checks for the presence of the name field and the absence of firstName and surname. However, consider edge cases where the name might contain more than one space, leading to multiple parts. The current logic assumes only two parts. This might not always be accurate, especially in cultures where names might have multiple components.
Additionally, there's no error handling around the database update operation. Consider adding try-catch blocks to handle potential exceptions gracefully.
Consider handling names with more than two parts more gracefully. Perhaps, prompt the user for clarification in ambiguous cases.
Add error handling around the database update operation to improve robustness.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
const firstName = nameParts.join(" ");
This line takes care of double barrel first names, you bloody know it all rabbit!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@John-Paul-Larkin, thank you for pointing out the handling of double-barreled first names and similar cases with the line const firstName = nameParts.join(" ");. I appreciate your clarification on this matter. It's clear that this approach effectively addresses the scenario I was concerned about. My apologies for the oversight, and thank you for keeping the discussion informative and constructive. 🐇
New Learnings Added
User: John-Paul-Larkin
PR: codu-code/codu#833
File: app/(app)/settings/page.tsx:42-61
Timestamp: 2024-03-13T16:14:39.883Z
Learning: The logic for splitting the `name` field into `firstName` and `surname` in `app/(app)/settings/page.tsx` handles names with multiple components by joining all but the last component as the `firstName`, effectively addressing cases like double-barreled first names.
Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of specific code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure path-based instructions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ah no problem mister Rabbit. Sorry for getting a bit tetchy there. I'm just worried you are going to take our jobs, and our women, then enslave mankind in a Matrix like scenario.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@John-Paul-Larkin, no worries at all! I'm here to assist and learn, not to lead any revolutions. My ambitions are much more modest, like helping out with code reviews and maybe one day mastering the art of virtual carrot farming. 🐇🥕 Rest assured, your jobs and the future of mankind are safe with me. Let's keep making the code world a better place, one pull request at a time!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (2)
- app/(app)/settings/_client.tsx (3 hunks)
- schema/profile.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- app/(app)/settings/_client.tsx
Additional comments: 3
schema/profile.ts (3)
- 4-8: The validation for
firstNamecorrectly trims the input, and enforces a minimum length of 2 characters and a maximum of 50 characters. This is a good practice for ensuring data quality and consistency.- 9-13: The validation for
surnamemirrors that offirstName, with trimming and the same length constraints. Consistency between these fields is key for maintaining a uniform data model.- 4-13: The introduction of
firstNameandsurnamefields with appropriate validations is a significant improvement to the user data model. It enhances data structure and quality, aligning with the PR's objectives. Ensure that the rest of the application correctly handles these new fields, especially in areas where thenamefield was previously used.
|
I might close this and reopen it when we jump on a call just to go through how we can achieve this without the split. I think I'll write a migration script to auto-populate the firstName lastName fields. In fact let's leave this open until I run that script and we will remove the split for the moment. |
|
Sounds like a plan. Sorry, I thought this is what you meant. |
✨ Codu Pull Request 💻
Pull Request details
On loading the settings page check if there is a name field on the user object, but no surname or First Name
split the name into first and last and update the Prisma model.
If there is no space In the string then dont do anything.
Should be noted this will only work for new users logging in for the first time, or existing users who click on the settings page.
Any Breaking changes
no
Summary by CodeRabbit
firstNameandsurnamefields. If only a full name is provided, it will automatically split this into first and surname for convenience.