fix(package): use babel-runtime is a dependency (dependencies)

[nickpape]

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

• Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
• Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)

• [*] Bugfix
• Feature
• Code style update (formatting, local variables)
• Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
• Build related changes
• CI related changes
• Other... Please describe:

What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here)

lib/karma-webpack.js has the following line:

var _toConsumableArray2 = require('babel-runtime/helpers/toConsumableArray');

When using pnpm, the babel-runtime is marked as a devDependency and therefore not included in the node_modules. Hence you get the following error:

27 02 2018 10:54:19.765:ERROR [config]: Invalid config file!
  Error: Cannot find module 'babel-runtime/helpers/toConsumableArray'
    at Function.Module._resolveFilename (module.js:469:15)
    at Function.Module._load (module.js:417:25)
    at Module.require (module.js:497:17)
    at require (internal/module.js:20:19)
    at Object.<anonymous> (D:\GitRepos\sp-client2\common\temp\node_modules\.onedrive.pkgs.visualstudio.com\karma-webpack\2.0.12\webpack@3.6.0\node_modules\karma-webpack\lib\karma-webpack.js:3:27)

What is the new behavior?

The babel-runtime is installed as a runtime dependency.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

• Yes
• [*] No

If this PR contains a breaking change, please describe the following...

• Impact:
• Migration path for existing applications:
• Github Issue(s) this is regarding:

Other information:

[jsf-clabot]

Thank you for your submission, we really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.

[michael-ciniawsky]

@nickpape-msft Thx

[michael-ciniawsky]

Released in v2.0.13 🎉

[michael-ciniawsky]

😱 @nickpape-msft Please sign the CLA or I need to revert this

[nickpape]

I work at a large company, it will likely take weeks to sign the CLA, but I started the approval process. Perhaps we want to revert and then have someone who has signed the CLA to clean-room this change.

[benedikt-roth]

@michael-ciniawsky will you revert the change? I would like to know, since we locked the dependency version to 2.0.9 for now. I'd like to unlock it again but do not want it to break if it is going to be reverted in 2.0.14. Thanks for the info and thanks for the fix, Nicholas.