Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mark fmt-8.1.0 as broken #367

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 4, 2022
Merged

Mark fmt-8.1.0 as broken #367

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 4, 2022

Conversation

saraedum
Copy link
Member

@saraedum saraedum commented Jan 4, 2022

fmt-8.1.0 introduced a breaking ABI change. This breaks packages that
were built against fmt-8.0.1 when they use fmt-8.1.0 at runtime.

The issue has been reported upstream and a patch is waiting to be
merged. We might create a patched 8.1.0 build or wait for 8.1.1; the
relevant discussion is at
conda-forge/fmt-feedstock#28 and
fmtlib/fmt#2696.

An alternative here would be to patch the repodata and tell the <8.1.0
build to use !=8.1.0_0. However, it does not seem to be the correct
approach to me to exclude a single build with a constraint.

fmt-8.1.0 introduced a breaking ABI change. This breaks packages that
were built against fmt-8.0.1 when they use fmt-8.1.0 at runtime.

The issue has been reported upstream and a patch is waiting to be
merged. We might create a patched 8.1.0 build or wait for 8.1.1; the
relevant discussion is at
conda-forge/fmt-feedstock#28 and
fmtlib/fmt#2696.

An alternative here would be to patch the repodata and tell the <8.1.0
build to use !=8.1.0_0. However, it does not seem to be the correct
approach to me to exclude a single build with a constraint.
@saraedum saraedum requested a review from a team as a code owner January 4, 2022 15:41
@saraedum
Copy link
Member Author

saraedum commented Jan 4, 2022

ping @conda-forge/fmt

@ocefpaf ocefpaf merged commit 00ec2e0 into conda-forge:main Jan 4, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants