Reduce initial funds to test address

[adlrocha]

This PR is an excuse to open a quick discussion. So far, before we had cross-net messages, we provided some genesis funds to our test address to help with testing. We were funding the address with 5000FIL from genesis. Now that we have cross-net messages (and considering that the wallet key can be potentially leaked easily as is the one we are using for tests and in many tutorials). Should we reduce (or completely remove) these genesis funds even if that makes testing a bit harder for us as we would have to get funds from the faucet also? (practically we could also fund some other address manually with "significant" faucet funds).

This PR reduces the initial funds to 50FIL, should we reduce it more, leave it as-is, or remove them all the way?

[dnkolegov]

If we can, we should remove the funds!

[jsoares]

What I'm hearing is that this address t1cp4q4lqsdhob23ysywffg2tvbmar5cshia4rweq is initialised with 5000 FIL both in the local root deployment and in Spacenet, and the key is in https://github.com/consensus-shipyard/lotus/blob/f5c0d77e7edbda1363b121c553dc7ac53a824b45/scripts/ipc/src/wallet.key. And you're proposing lowering or removing it in both. Is that right?

If I understand correctly, that's also why consensus-shipyard/ipc-libs#167 (comment) happens. I thought this was only a problem for spacenet initially and that having 0 or 50 was indifferent, but now I'm thinking we should bring it to 0 to avoid these inconsistencies.

How does this affect local root testing, in the absence of a faucet? I guess the rootnet validator should be earning FIL that could then be transferred but mine doesn't seem to -- despite everything else working fine and there clearly being validation taking place 🤔

[adlrocha]

Quick update: I pushed a few changes to scripts so the rootnet uses a genesis-test template that some funds to the test account, while for the spacenet genesis no funds are provided in genesis (apart from the ones given to the faucet). We should be covered with this.

[jsoares]

lgtm but the tests are still failing due to insufficient funds; is this something we need to address or are we fine to release for spacenet and then adjust?

[adlrocha]

lgtm but the tests are still failing due to insufficient funds; is this something we need to address or are we fine to release for spacenet and then adjust?

It was failing because I introduced an unexpected bug :) Already fixed. Thank you for flagging.