-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update Fedora to 33 beta #26
Conversation
2fa52b4
to
d839e80
Compare
633d600
to
3c39d80
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM.
@cevich and I noticed weirdness when rsa was used, but things worked fine with ed25519. Worth investigating but at least something works :D
3b872fd
to
8a700f0
Compare
@cevich ok, some progress: The packer GCP instance doesn't seem to have First, I left In the packer VM, I did:
$ sudo dnf -y reinstall openssh openssh-server
$ sudo systemctl restart sshd
Now, I seem to hit another ssh issue down the road:
|
Signed-off-by: Chris Evich <cevich@redhat.com>
@lsm5 Thanks for the help! |
c6058294462644224 |
So, the latest master branch works fine for me for both ubuntu and fedora. Last evening, you mentioned it could be a packer issue. But I'm not sure I understand. The deletion of /etc/ssh/moduli was done in this repo, was it a prior requirement for packer? |
Also, does this imply that we can now test with fedora 33 in our CI? |
Oh, meaning: Other distros will likely eventually follow suit, banning
Nope, just a guess at my part as to the steps needed to "reset" a VM image. As you saw, prior versions of sshd regenerated the file on startup if it was missing. Apparently not doing that is a new feature? 😄
Yes! Plop |
Signed-off-by: Chris Evich cevich@redhat.com