-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 142
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fedora33: update-crypto-policies --set LEGACY
#173
Conversation
1e6555c
to
eb09372
Compare
@ladar The current implementation (https://github.com/lavabit/robox/pull/173/files#diff-f910de6f4744660a002d304cbe816512bf93f5c5c848581bf062adf2e47c6063R40-R42) should be logically correct:
Though out the entire packer BTW, after If I manually login though virt console and execute Now if execute As I am using UPDATE: no, it shouldn't related to |
Upstream SSH has been claiming for a few releases now that: It is now possible to perform chosen-prefix attacks against the SHA-1 algorithm for less than USD$50K. For this reason, we will be disabling the "ssh-rsa" public key signature algorithm by default in a near-future release. See hashicorp/vagrant#11783 (comment)
eb09372
to
91a3a03
Compare
Even downgrade from |
@ladar Oh you already mery this PR ^_^|| BTW, from hashicorp/vagrant#11783 (comment) which goes to https://pagure.io/fedora-kickstarts/pull-request/669#request_diff from official Fedora Vagrant image, the change should be something like:
|
@hswong3i I like this new method a lot more. I updated the |
@ladar OMG!!! So this two lines (1526688#diff-f910de6f4744660a002d304cbe816512bf93f5c5c848581bf062adf2e47c6063R46-R47) are the tricks for keeping the file exists after provisioning!? I had been trying out for more than 2 days but just missing this two lines O_o!?
EDIT: Oh I get it!! So its the SELinux getting me into the trobule, AGAIN!! But why Fedora official vagrant box (https://pagure.io/fedora-kickstarts/blob/master/f/fedora-cloud-base.ks#_29) didn't affected!?
|
@hswong3i SElinux is enabled in our version as well. You can confirm by running |
@hswong3i yes, the issue wasn't fixed in Either way, I'm starting the |
Upstream SSH has been claiming for a few releases now that:
Also see: