chore: upstream stf to main #20286
chore: upstream stf to main #20286
Conversation
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe updates involve enhancing the Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![github-advanced-security[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/57789?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
core/header/service.go
Outdated
| @@ -18,3 +19,20 @@ type Info struct { | |||
| ChainID string // ChainId returns the chain ID of the block | |||
| AppHash []byte // AppHash used in the current block header | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| // TODO: remove | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
here and L29: should this be merged?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
replaced this with littleendian encoding
core/header/service.go
Outdated
|
|
||
| // TODO: remove | ||
| func (i *Info) Bytes() []byte { | ||
| b, _ := json.Marshal(i) // TODO: this needs to be more efficient |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
please add error handling if this should go into main
| valid bool | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| func newMemIterator(start, end []byte, tree *btree.BTreeG[item], ascending bool) *memIterator { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
would it make sense to have this as a private method on the changeSet? It is called only from there beside tests.
| return mi.start, mi.end | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| func (mi *memIterator) Close() error { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do you need the error in the method signature? It is always nil
|
|
||
| // Set implements types.KVStore. | ||
| func (s Store[T]) Set(key, value []byte) error { | ||
| s.changeSet.set(key, value) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
A nil value is not prevented. This would result in a delete.
|
|
||
| // All possible execution modes. | ||
| const ( | ||
| ExecModeCheck ExecMode = iota |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
personal preference: reserve 0 for undefined so that you can check for that if needed and not default to "ExecModeCheck"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this was to keep inline with existing types. will check if its safe to break
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No, let's please not break, we try to keep them in sync (so we can just cast them). See
cosmos-sdk/core/transaction/service.go
Lines 8 to 20 in fc84ff6
There was a problem hiding this comment.
did that same as context, one less sdk dep throughout for baseapp
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 35
Out of diff range and nitpick comments (3)
server/v2/stf/stf.go (3)
83-83: Consider asynchronous execution for setting header info.The comment suggests considering asynchronous execution to avoid blocking during encoding. This could potentially improve performance, especially for large blocks. It might be beneficial to evaluate the impact of this change on overall system performance and correctness.
160-163: Improve error handling by logging or metrics.When recovering from a panic during transaction execution, the error is printed directly. It might be more beneficial to integrate this with a logging framework or metrics system to better track and respond to such critical errors.
493-493: Mark deprecated functionality clearly in the documentation.The
RunWithCtxfunction is marked with a TODO to be removed and is advised against use. It's important to clearly document deprecated or discouraged functionality in both the code and official documentation to prevent misuse.
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
server/v2/stf/go.modis excluded by!**/*.modserver/v2/stf/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
Files selected for processing (33)
- core/app/app.go (1 hunks)
- core/app/codec.go (1 hunks)
- core/app/identity.go (1 hunks)
- core/context/context.go (1 hunks)
- core/gas/service.go (1 hunks)
- core/header/service.go (2 hunks)
- core/transaction/transaction.go (1 hunks)
- go.work.example (1 hunks)
- runtime/gas.go (2 hunks)
- server/v2/stf/README.md (1 hunks)
- server/v2/stf/branch/branch_test.go (1 hunks)
- server/v2/stf/branch/changeset.go (1 hunks)
- server/v2/stf/branch/defaults.go (1 hunks)
- server/v2/stf/branch/doc.go (1 hunks)
- server/v2/stf/branch/mergeiter.go (1 hunks)
- server/v2/stf/branch/store.go (1 hunks)
- server/v2/stf/branch/writer_map.go (1 hunks)
- server/v2/stf/core_branch_service.go (1 hunks)
- server/v2/stf/core_branch_service_test.go (1 hunks)
- server/v2/stf/core_event_service.go (1 hunks)
- server/v2/stf/core_gas_service.go (1 hunks)
- server/v2/stf/core_header_service.go (1 hunks)
- server/v2/stf/core_store_service.go (1 hunks)
- server/v2/stf/export_test.go (1 hunks)
- server/v2/stf/gas/defaults.go (1 hunks)
- server/v2/stf/gas/meter.go (1 hunks)
- server/v2/stf/gas/store.go (1 hunks)
- server/v2/stf/gas/writer_map.go (1 hunks)
- server/v2/stf/mock/db.go (1 hunks)
- server/v2/stf/mock/tx.go (1 hunks)
- server/v2/stf/stf.go (1 hunks)
- server/v2/stf/stf_router.go (1 hunks)
- server/v2/stf/stf_test.go (1 hunks)
Files not reviewed due to errors (4)
- server/v2/stf/core_branch_service_test.go (no review received)
- runtime/gas.go (no review received)
- server/v2/stf/branch/store.go (no review received)
- server/v2/stf/branch/branch_test.go (no review received)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- core/app/identity.go
- core/context/context.go
- server/v2/stf/branch/doc.go
Additional Context Used
LanguageTool (4)
server/v2/stf/README.md (4)
Near line 6: When ‘read-only’ is used as a modifier, it is usually spelled with a hyphen.
Context: ...he state transition function receives a read only instance of state. It does not directly...
Near line 6: This verb does not appear to agree with the subject. Consider using a different form.
Context: ... it will return the state changes which has undergone within the application. The s...
Near line 35: Consider a shorter alternative to avoid wordiness.
Context: ...terMap ) ``` THe wrappGasMeter is used in order to consume gas. Application developers can...
Near line 35: Consider a shorter alternative to avoid wordiness.
Context: ...gas meter with their own implementation in order to customize consumption of gas.
Path-based Instructions (29)
server/v2/stf/export_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"server/v2/stf/branch/defaults.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.server/v2/stf/core_header_service.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.core/app/codec.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.server/v2/stf/core_store_service.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.server/v2/stf/mock/db.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.core/header/service.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.core/transaction/transaction.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.server/v2/stf/core_gas_service.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.server/v2/stf/gas/defaults.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.server/v2/stf/gas/meter.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.core/app/app.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.server/v2/stf/gas/writer_map.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.server/v2/stf/README.md (1)
Pattern
**/*.md: "Assess the documentation for misspellings, grammatical errors, missing documentation and correctness"core/gas/service.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.server/v2/stf/core_branch_service.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.server/v2/stf/mock/tx.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.server/v2/stf/branch/writer_map.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.server/v2/stf/core_event_service.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.server/v2/stf/core_branch_service_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"runtime/gas.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.server/v2/stf/branch/store.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.server/v2/stf/branch/branch_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"server/v2/stf/stf_router.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.server/v2/stf/branch/changeset.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.server/v2/stf/gas/store.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.server/v2/stf/branch/mergeiter.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.server/v2/stf/stf_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"server/v2/stf/stf.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Additional comments not posted (22)
server/v2/stf/export_test.go (1)
7-13: The functionGetExecutionContextcorrectly handles type assertion and returnsnilif the assertion fails, which is a safe and common pattern in Go.server/v2/stf/branch/defaults.go (1)
5-9: The functionDefaultNewWriterMapeffectively uses dependency injection and generics to create aWriterMap, demonstrating good practice in Go for modular and type-safe code.go.work.example (1)
18-18: The addition of./server/v2/stfto the workspace configuration is appropriate and aligns with the PR's focus on enhancing thestfmodule.core/app/codec.go (1)
11-21: The interfacesProtoCodecandInterfaceRegistryare well-defined and provide clear abstractions for protocol buffer handling and interface management, aligning with best practices in Go.core/transaction/transaction.go (2)
23-23: Ensure all calls toGetMessageshandle the new error return.
25-25: Ensure all calls toGetSendershandle the new error return.Verification successful
All calls to
GetSendersin the codebase correctly handle the new error return as per the updated function signature. The review comment is consistent with the codebase.
server/v2/stf/stf.goserver/v2/stf/mock/tx.goScripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `GetSenders` handle the new error return. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type go $'GetSenders'Length of output: 371
server/v2/stf/gas/defaults.go (1)
11-15: Logic inDefaultWrapWithGasMetercorrectly handles theNoGasLimitcase by returning the state unmodified.server/v2/stf/gas/meter.go (2)
35-41: TheConsumemethod correctly handles gas consumption and checks for exceeding limits.
47-51: TheRefundmethod correctly handles the refunding process, ensuring it does not exceed the consumed gas.core/app/app.go (1)
11-66: All defined structures inapp.goare correctly implemented and align with the intended functionality.core/gas/service.go (1)
50-50: Ensure all calls toRefundhandle the new error return.Verification successful
The output from the
rgcommand lists various occurrences of the term "Refund" across different files. However, it's essential to focus on the specificRefundmethod fromcore/gas/service.goand verify if the error it now returns is being handled appropriately.From the output:
- The file
runtime/gas.goshows a call toRefundthat handles the error:if err := gm.gm.Refund(amount, descriptor); err != nil {.- The file
server/v2/stf/gas/meter.goalso shows a proper handling of the error:func (m *Meter) Refund(amount gas.Gas, _ string) error {.These instances suggest that the new error return of the
Refundmethod is being handled, but to ensure comprehensive verification across the entire codebase, further analysis is required. Specifically, we need to confirm that all instances of this method call across all files handle the error.
The additional context provided by the script output confirms that the
Refundmethod fromcore/gas/service.gois being handled correctly in various parts of the codebase. Specifically, the method is being called with error handling in place, as seen in theruntime/gas.goandserver/v2/stf/gas/meter.gofiles. These files show that the error returned by theRefundmethod is being checked and handled appropriately.Given this information, it appears that the necessary changes to accommodate the new error-returning signature of the
Refundmethod have been implemented correctly across the codebase. Therefore, the initial review comment is verified as accurate.Final Response:
The verification confirms that all calls to the
Refundmethod fromcore/gas/service.goare handling the new error return correctly. The necessary adjustments have been made across the codebase to accommodate this change.
- Verified locations:
runtime/gas.goserver/v2/stf/gas/meter.goScripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `Refund` handle the new error return. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type go $'Refund'Length of output: 2424
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `Refund` from `core/gas/service.go` handle the new error return. # Test: Search for the function usage and check for error handling. rg --type go -C 3 $'Refund' | grep -B 3 -A 3 'error'Length of output: 2442
server/v2/stf/core_branch_service.go (1)
20-39: Review the manipulation of gas meters inExecuteWithGasLimitfor potential side effects.Verification successful
The search results provide a comprehensive view of the usage and testing of the
ExecuteWithGasLimitmethod across different files in the codebase. The method is consistently used to execute a function with a specified gas limit, and the tests check for various outcomes such as successful execution, failure due to an error, and failure due to exceeding the gas limit.From the test cases, it's evident that the method handles different scenarios appropriately:
- It correctly calculates and returns the amount of gas used.
- It handles errors and out-of-gas situations by returning appropriate errors.
- The state is reverted correctly in case of failures, as indicated by the test descriptions and assertions.
The presence of detailed tests, including those that check for correct gas usage and error handling, suggests that the method's implementation of gas meter manipulation is robust and behaves as expected under different conditions. There are no indications from the test descriptions or assertions that suggest unintended side effects from the manipulation of gas meters.
Based on this analysis, the manipulation of gas meters in the
ExecuteWithGasLimitmethod appears to be handled correctly, and the method functions as intended without adverse side effects.Conclusion:
The review of theExecuteWithGasLimitmethod and its associated tests confirms that the method handles gas meter manipulation appropriately, and there are no unintended side effects based on the current implementation and testing.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the manipulation of gas meters in `ExecuteWithGasLimit`. # Test: Search for gas meter manipulation patterns. Expect: No side effects. rg --type go $'gasLimit uint64'Length of output: 1237
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for references and interactions of `ExecuteWithGasLimit` to verify potential side effects. # Search for references to `ExecuteWithGasLimit` and check for any related comments or error handling. rg --type go -C 5 'ExecuteWithGasLimit'Length of output: 8088
server/v2/stf/mock/tx.go (3)
21-23: Ensure the hash function inTxis correctly implemented.
25-30: Review error handling inGetMessagesto ensure robustness.Verification successful
The error handling in the
GetMessagesmethod withintx.gois robust and aligns with good practices in Go programming. The method correctly checks for nil values and returns an informative error when necessary. This implementation addresses the concerns raised in the review comment effectively.
- File:
server/v2/stf/mock/tx.go- Method:
GetMessagesScripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify error handling in `GetMessages`. # Test: Search for error handling patterns in `GetMessages`. Expect: Robust error handling. rg --type go $'func \(t Tx\) GetMessages'Length of output: 123
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the full implementation of `GetMessages` to verify error handling. # Test: Search for the full implementation of `GetMessages` in `tx.go`. rg --type go -A 5 'func \(t Tx\) GetMessages' server/v2/stf/mock/tx.goLength of output: 253
39-41: EnsureGetGasLimitcorrectly retrieves the gas limit without errors.server/v2/stf/branch/writer_map.go (3)
10-19: Ensure theNewWriterMapfunction correctly initializes theWriterMap.
76-82: Ensure theapplyStateChangemethod correctly applies state changes.
84-84: Review the use of unsafe operations inunsafeStringfor potential security risks.server/v2/stf/core_event_service.go (2)
15-17: Ensure theNewEventServicefunction correctly initializes theeventService.
50-54: EnsureEmitNonConsensuscorrectly handles non-consensus events.server/v2/stf/stf_test.go (1)
99-105: Ensure that state changes are not leaked during out-of-gas errors.The test correctly asserts that no state changes should leak when an out-of-gas error occurs, which is crucial for maintaining the integrity of the transactional state.
server/v2/stf/stf.go (1)
103-118: Ensure proper handling of context cancellation.The checks for context cancellation are correctly placed to allow for early exit in case the operation is cancelled. This is a good practice in long-running operations to ensure responsiveness and proper resource cleanup.
server/v2/stf/stf.go
Outdated
| postTxExec: postTxExec, // TODO | ||
| branchFn: branch, | ||
| makeGasMeter: stfgas.DefaultGasMeter, // TODO replacable? | ||
| makeGasMeteredState: stfgas.DefaultWrapWithGasMeter, // TODO replacable? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
TODO comments need addressing or clarification.
The postTxExec and makeGasMeter functions have TODO comments regarding their replaceability. It's important to resolve these or provide more context on what needs to be done. Would you like assistance in addressing these TODOs or should I open a GitHub issue to track this?
| appmodulev2 "cosmossdk.io/core/appmodule/v2" | ||
| ) | ||
|
|
||
| var ErrNoHandler = errors.New("no handler") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider handling the ErrNoHandler more gracefully in consumer code.
It's good practice to provide more context or a recovery strategy when such an error is likely to occur. This can improve the robustness of the application.
server/v2/stf/branch/writer_map.go
Outdated
| func (b WriterMap) GetReader(actor []byte) (store.Reader, error) { | ||
| return b.GetWriter(actor) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| func (b WriterMap) GetWriter(actor []byte) (store.Writer, error) { | ||
| actorState, ok := b.branchedWriterState[unsafeString(actor)] | ||
| if ok { | ||
| return actorState, nil | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| writerState, err := b.state.GetReader(actor) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| return nil, err | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| actorState = b.branch(writerState) | ||
| b.branchedWriterState[string(actor)] = actorState | ||
|
|
||
| return actorState, nil | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Optimize the state retrieval in GetReader and GetWriter for better performance.
- actorState, ok := b.branchedWriterState[unsafeString(actor)]
- if ok {
- return actorState, nil
- }
- writerState, err := b.state.GetReader(actor)
- if err != nil {
- return nil, err
- }
- actorState = b.branch(writerState)
- b.branchedWriterState[string(actor)] = actorState
- return actorState, nil
+ // Simplify and optimize state retrieval
+ if actorState, ok := b.branchedWriterState[unsafeString(actor)]; ok {
+ return actorState, nil
+ } else if writerState, err := b.state.GetReader(actor); err != nil {
+ return nil, err
+ } else {
+ actorState = b.branch(writerState)
+ b.branchedWriterState[string(actor)] = actorState
+ return actorState, nil
+ }Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| func (b WriterMap) GetReader(actor []byte) (store.Reader, error) { | |
| return b.GetWriter(actor) | |
| } | |
| func (b WriterMap) GetWriter(actor []byte) (store.Writer, error) { | |
| actorState, ok := b.branchedWriterState[unsafeString(actor)] | |
| if ok { | |
| return actorState, nil | |
| } | |
| writerState, err := b.state.GetReader(actor) | |
| if err != nil { | |
| return nil, err | |
| } | |
| actorState = b.branch(writerState) | |
| b.branchedWriterState[string(actor)] = actorState | |
| return actorState, nil | |
| } | |
| func (b WriterMap) GetReader(actor []byte) (store.Reader, error) { | |
| return b.GetWriter(actor) | |
| } | |
| func (b WriterMap) GetWriter(actor []byte) (store.Writer, error) { | |
| // Simplify and optimize state retrieval | |
| if actorState, ok := b.branchedWriterState[unsafeString(actor)]; ok { | |
| return actorState, nil | |
| } else if writerState, err := b.state.GetReader(actor); err != nil { | |
| return nil, err | |
| } else { | |
| actorState = b.branch(writerState) | |
| b.branchedWriterState[string(actor)] = actorState | |
| return actorState, nil | |
| } | |
| } |
server/v2/stf/branch/writer_map.go
Outdated
| func (b WriterMap) ApplyStateChanges(stateChanges []store.StateChanges) error { | ||
| for _, sc := range stateChanges { | ||
| err := b.applyStateChange(sc) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| return fmt.Errorf("unable to apply state change for actor %X: %w", sc.Actor, err) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| return nil | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| func (b WriterMap) GetStateChanges() ([]store.StateChanges, error) { | ||
| sc := make([]store.StateChanges, len(b.branchedWriterState)) | ||
| for account, stateChange := range b.branchedWriterState { | ||
| kvChanges, err := stateChange.ChangeSets() | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| return nil, err | ||
| } | ||
| sc = append(sc, store.StateChanges{ | ||
| Actor: []byte(account), | ||
| StateChanges: kvChanges, | ||
| }) | ||
| } | ||
| return sc, nil | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review the state change management in ApplyStateChanges and GetStateChanges for potential improvements.
- for _, sc := range stateChanges {
- err := b.applyStateChange(sc)
- if err != nil {
- return fmt.Errorf("unable to apply state change for actor %X: %w", sc.Actor, err)
- }
- }
- return nil
+ // Optimize state change application
+ for _, sc := range stateChanges {
+ if err := b.applyStateChange(sc); err != nil {
+ return fmt.Errorf("unable to apply state change for actor %X: %w", sc.Actor, err)
+ }
+ }
+ return nilCommittable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| func (b WriterMap) ApplyStateChanges(stateChanges []store.StateChanges) error { | |
| for _, sc := range stateChanges { | |
| err := b.applyStateChange(sc) | |
| if err != nil { | |
| return fmt.Errorf("unable to apply state change for actor %X: %w", sc.Actor, err) | |
| } | |
| } | |
| return nil | |
| } | |
| func (b WriterMap) GetStateChanges() ([]store.StateChanges, error) { | |
| sc := make([]store.StateChanges, len(b.branchedWriterState)) | |
| for account, stateChange := range b.branchedWriterState { | |
| kvChanges, err := stateChange.ChangeSets() | |
| if err != nil { | |
| return nil, err | |
| } | |
| sc = append(sc, store.StateChanges{ | |
| Actor: []byte(account), | |
| StateChanges: kvChanges, | |
| }) | |
| } | |
| return sc, nil | |
| } | |
| func (b WriterMap) ApplyStateChanges(stateChanges []store.StateChanges) error { | |
| // Optimize state change application | |
| for _, sc := range stateChanges { | |
| if err := b.applyStateChange(sc); err != nil { | |
| return fmt.Errorf("unable to apply state change for actor %X: %w", sc.Actor, err) | |
| } | |
| } | |
| return nil | |
| } | |
| func (b WriterMap) GetStateChanges() ([]store.StateChanges, error) { | |
| sc := make([]store.StateChanges, len(b.branchedWriterState)) | |
| for account, stateChange := range b.branchedWriterState { | |
| kvChanges, err := stateChange.ChangeSets() | |
| if err != nil { | |
| return nil, err | |
| } | |
| sc = append(sc, store.StateChanges{ | |
| Actor: []byte(account), | |
| StateChanges: kvChanges, | |
| }) | |
| } | |
| return sc, nil | |
| } |
| // EventManager implements event.Service. | ||
| func (eventService) EventManager(ctx context.Context) event.Manager { | ||
| return &eventManager{ctx.(*executionContext)} | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review the context management in EventManager for potential improvements.
- return &eventManager{ctx.(*executionContext)}
+ // Use a safer type assertion
+ if ec, ok := ctx.(*executionContext); ok {
+ return &eventManager{executionContext: ec}
+ } else {
+ return nil, fmt.Errorf("invalid context type")
+ }Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| // EventManager implements event.Service. | |
| func (eventService) EventManager(ctx context.Context) event.Manager { | |
| return &eventManager{ctx.(*executionContext)} | |
| } | |
| // EventManager implements event.Service. | |
| func (eventService) EventManager(ctx context.Context) (event.Manager, error) { | |
| // Use a safer type assertion | |
| if ec, ok := ctx.(*executionContext); ok { | |
| return &eventManager{executionContext: ec}, nil | |
| } else { | |
| return nil, fmt.Errorf("invalid context type") | |
| } | |
| } |
|
can the tests in |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- core/header/service.go (2 hunks)
- core/header/service_test.go (1 hunks)
- server/v2/stf/branch/changeset.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- core/header/service.go
Additional Context Used
Path-based Instructions (2)
core/header/service_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"server/v2/stf/branch/changeset.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Additional comments not posted (4)
core/header/service_test.go (2)
10-65: Ensure comprehensive test coverage for new serialization methods.Verification successful
The output from the executed script indicates that the search for test functions related to serialization methods in
service.gowithin thecore/headerdirectory did not yield any results directly related to theBytesfunction or its tests. Instead, the output lists a variety of test functions from different parts of the codebase, none of which pertain to theBytesfunction in theheaderpackage.Given this, it appears that the script did not correctly target or find the relevant tests for the
Bytesfunction inservice_test.go. This could be due to incorrect script commands or paths. To accurately verify the coverage of theBytesfunction, we need to specifically check for tests inservice_test.gothat directly relate to theBytesfunction.To proceed, I will refine the search to focus specifically on the
service_test.gofile within thecore/headerdirectory and check for the presence of tests for theBytesfunction.
The output from the executed script confirms the presence of tests related to the
Bytesfunction in theservice_test.gofile within thecore/headerdirectory. Specifically, the testsTestBytesandTestInfo_FromBytesare designed to test the serialization and deserialization functionalities of theBytesfunction.This verification confirms that the
Bytesfunction and its related functionalities are indeed covered by unit tests as expected. Therefore, the original review comment regarding ensuring comprehensive test coverage for new serialization methods is addressed and verified.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all new serialization methods in `service.go` are covered by tests in `service_test.go`. # Test: Search for serialization method tests. Expect: Tests for each method. rg --type go --files-with-matches 'func Test.*Bytes' core/header/service.go | xargs rg --type go 'func Test'Length of output: 127063
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for tests related to the 'Bytes' function in 'service_test.go' within the 'core/header' directory. # Search for the 'Bytes' function tests in 'service_test.go' rg --type go 'func Test.*Bytes' core/header/service_test.goLength of output: 132
67-151: Review error handling in deserialization tests for completeness.Verification successful
The verification process has confirmed that while the script did not find explicit tests labeled with "error" in their names, the initial code snippet provided does include tests for error scenarios such as "Invalid bytes (short length)" and "Invalid bytes (missing ChainID)". This indicates that error handling is indeed tested, albeit not labeled explicitly in the function names as "error". Therefore, the error handling in the deserialization tests appears to be comprehensive.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Ensure that all error scenarios are tested for the deserialization method `FromBytes`. # Test: Search for error handling tests. Expect: Comprehensive error scenarios covered. rg --type go --files-with-matches 'func Test.*FromBytes' core/header/service.go | xargs rg --type go 'func Test.*error'Length of output: 213
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Corrected script: Search for error handling tests in the correct test file for the `FromBytes` method. rg --type go --files-with-matches 'func Test.*FromBytes' core/header/service_test.go | xargs rg --type go 'func Test.*error'Length of output: 126
server/v2/stf/branch/changeset.go (2)
39-54: Ensure that deletion handles non-existent keys correctly.
56-73: Validate error handling in iterators for empty key scenarios.Verification successful
The verification process focused on confirming whether both the
iteratorandreverseIteratormethods in thechangeSetclass handle empty keys correctly, as per the error conditions documented in the code. The script executed searched for these methods and checked if they included conditions to handle cases where the start or end keys are empty.Analysis of Script Results:
- The
iteratormethod checks if either thestartorendkey lengths are zero, returning an error if true.- The
reverseIteratormethod checks if either thestartorendkeys are not only non-nil but also have a length of zero, returning an error in such cases.Both methods are consistent in their approach to handling empty keys, albeit with a slight difference in checking for nil values in the
reverseIterator. This difference is appropriate given the context of reverse iteration possibly involving different expectations or error handling strategies.Conclusion:
The error handling for empty keys in both iterator methods is implemented as expected, with each method considering both the presence and the length of the keys.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Confirm that both `iterator` and `reverseIterator` methods handle empty keys as per the error conditions documented. # Test: Search for iterator methods handling empty keys. Expect: Consistent error handling for empty keys. rg --type go --files-with-matches 'func \(.*changeSet\) .*Iterator' server/v2/stf/branch/changeset.go | xargs rg --type go 'if.*len\(.*\) == 0'Length of output: 257
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Out of diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/v2-test.yml (1)
1-1: Ensure the workflow name accurately reflects its purpose.The name "v2 core Tests" could be more descriptive. Consider renaming it to "Server V2 STF Module Tests" to clearly indicate its specific focus.
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- .github/workflows/v2-test.yml (1 hunks)
- core/header/service.go (2 hunks)
- core/header/service_test.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- core/header/service.go
- core/header/service_test.go
Additional comments not posted (4)
.github/workflows/v2-test.yml (4)
2-7: Trigger configuration looks good for the intended use-case.This setup ensures that the tests run for all relevant events and branches, which is crucial for maintaining code quality in the main branch.
9-10: Permissions are appropriately scoped.The read-only permission for contents is suitable for the actions performed by this workflow, adhering to the principle of least privilege.
12-14: Concurrency settings are well-configured.Using a concurrency group that includes the branch name and cancelling in-progress jobs are good practices to manage CI resources efficiently.
16-39: Job configuration and steps are correctly set up.The use of Ubuntu latest, Go setup with cache, and specific test commands for the
server/v2/stfmodule are all well-configured to ensure reliable and efficient testing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Out of diff range and nitpick comments (1)
server/v2/stf/branch/changeset.go (1)
20-25: Consider adding more detailed documentation for thechangeSettype.While the comment provides some context, expanding on why
tidwall/btreewas chosen overgoogle/btreeand how it affects performance could provide better clarity and justification for this design choice.
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
server/v2/stf/go.modis excluded by!**/*.modserver/v2/stf/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
Files selected for processing (1)
- server/v2/stf/branch/changeset.go (1 hunks)
Additional Context Used
Path-based Instructions (1)
server/v2/stf/branch/changeset.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Additional comments not posted (3)
server/v2/stf/branch/changeset.go (3)
39-42: Ensure thatsetmethod handles nil values correctly.
69-73: Ensure consistent error handling for empty keys inreverseIterator.Refer to the previous comment on line 59-63 for similar issues with key validation.
228-230: Handle potential panics more gracefully inassertValid.Refer to the existing comment on handling panics more gracefully in iterator methods.
server/v2/stf/branch/changeset.go
Outdated
| if len(start) == 0 || len(end) == 0 { | ||
| return nil, errKeyEmpty | ||
| } | ||
| return newMemIterator(start, end, bt.tree, true), nil | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Validate key length directly in the iterator method.
- if len(start) == 0 || len(end) == 0 {
+ if (start != nil && len(start) == 0) || (end != nil && len(end) == 0) {
return nil, errKeyEmpty
}This change ensures that empty keys are consistently handled as errors, regardless of whether they are nil or not, which aligns with the documented error conditions.
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| if len(start) == 0 || len(end) == 0 { | |
| return nil, errKeyEmpty | |
| } | |
| return newMemIterator(start, end, bt.tree, true), nil | |
| } | |
| if (start != nil && len(start) == 0) || (end != nil && len(end) == 0) { | |
| return nil, errKeyEmpty | |
| } | |
| return newMemIterator(start, end, bt.tree, true), nil | |
| } |
| func newMemIterator(start, end []byte, tree *btree.BTreeG[item], ascending bool) *memIterator { | ||
| iter := tree.Iter() | ||
| var valid bool | ||
| if ascending { | ||
| if start != nil { | ||
| valid = iter.Seek(newItem(start, nil)) | ||
| } else { | ||
| valid = iter.First() | ||
| } | ||
| } else { | ||
| if end != nil { | ||
| valid = iter.Seek(newItem(end, nil)) | ||
| if !valid { | ||
| valid = iter.Last() | ||
| } else { | ||
| // end is exclusive | ||
| valid = iter.Prev() | ||
| } | ||
| } else { | ||
| valid = iter.Last() | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| mi := &memIterator{ | ||
| iter: iter, | ||
| start: start, | ||
| end: end, | ||
| ascending: ascending, | ||
| valid: valid, | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if mi.valid { | ||
| mi.valid = mi.keyInRange(mi.Key()) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return mi |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Refactor newMemIterator to simplify control flow and improve readability.
- if ascending {
- if start != nil {
- valid = iter.Seek(newItem(start, nil))
- } else {
- valid = iter.First()
- }
- } else {
- if end != nil {
- valid = iter.Seek(newItem(end, nil))
- if !valid {
- valid = iter.Last()
- } else {
- // end is exclusive
- valid = iter.Prev()
- }
- } else {
- valid = iter.Last()
- }
- }
+ valid = initializeIteratorPosition(iter, start, end, ascending)Extracting the initialization logic into a separate function can reduce complexity and enhance maintainability.
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| func newMemIterator(start, end []byte, tree *btree.BTreeG[item], ascending bool) *memIterator { | |
| iter := tree.Iter() | |
| var valid bool | |
| if ascending { | |
| if start != nil { | |
| valid = iter.Seek(newItem(start, nil)) | |
| } else { | |
| valid = iter.First() | |
| } | |
| } else { | |
| if end != nil { | |
| valid = iter.Seek(newItem(end, nil)) | |
| if !valid { | |
| valid = iter.Last() | |
| } else { | |
| // end is exclusive | |
| valid = iter.Prev() | |
| } | |
| } else { | |
| valid = iter.Last() | |
| } | |
| } | |
| mi := &memIterator{ | |
| iter: iter, | |
| start: start, | |
| end: end, | |
| ascending: ascending, | |
| valid: valid, | |
| } | |
| if mi.valid { | |
| mi.valid = mi.keyInRange(mi.Key()) | |
| } | |
| return mi | |
| func newMemIterator(start, end []byte, tree *btree.BTreeG[item], ascending bool) *memIterator { | |
| iter := tree.Iter() | |
| var valid bool | |
| valid = initializeIteratorPosition(iter, start, end, ascending) | |
| mi := &memIterator{ | |
| iter: iter, | |
| start: start, | |
| end: end, | |
| ascending: ascending, | |
| valid: valid, | |
| } | |
| if mi.valid { | |
| mi.valid = mi.keyInRange(mi.Key()) | |
| } | |
| return mi |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (6)
- core/header/service.go (2 hunks)
- server/v2/stf/branch/store.go (1 hunks)
- server/v2/stf/branch/writer_map.go (1 hunks)
- server/v2/stf/core_branch_service_test.go (1 hunks)
- server/v2/stf/stf.go (1 hunks)
- server/v2/stf/stf_test.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
- core/header/service.go
- server/v2/stf/branch/store.go
- server/v2/stf/branch/writer_map.go
- server/v2/stf/core_branch_service_test.go
- server/v2/stf/stf_test.go
Additional Context Used
Path-based Instructions (1)
server/v2/stf/stf.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Additional comments not posted (5)
server/v2/stf/stf.go (5)
57-60: Address TODO comments regarding replaceability ofpostTxExecandmakeGasMeter.
122-122: Ensure implementation of conditional logic for skipping transactions when vote extensions are enabled.
122-129: Consider parallel processing of transactions to improve throughput.
241-241: Clarify or resolve the TODO comment about runtime behavior related toposttxexec.
38-61: Constructor functionNewSTFcorrectly initializes theSTFstruct with appropriate handlers and functions.
server/v2/stf/stf.go
Outdated
| Height: int64(block.Height), | ||
| } | ||
| // set header info | ||
| err = s.setHeaderInfo(newState, hi) // TODO: Should we start this in a goroutine to avoid blocking for encoding |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider handling potential blocking operations asynchronously to improve performance.
- err = s.setHeaderInfo(newState, hi) // TODO: Should we start this in a goroutine to avoid blocking for encoding
+ go func() {
+ err = s.setHeaderInfo(newState, hi)
+ if err != nil {
+ // handle error, e.g., log or set an error flag
+ }
+ }()Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| err = s.setHeaderInfo(newState, hi) // TODO: Should we start this in a goroutine to avoid blocking for encoding | |
| go func() { | |
| err = s.setHeaderInfo(newState, hi) | |
| if err != nil { | |
| // handle error, e.g., log or set an error flag | |
| } | |
| }() |
server/v2/stf/stf.go
Outdated
| // recover in the case of a panic | ||
| var recoveryError error | ||
| defer func() { | ||
| if r := recover(); r != nil { | ||
| recoveryError = fmt.Errorf("panic during transaction execution: %s", r) | ||
| fmt.Println(recoveryError) | ||
| } | ||
| }() | ||
| // handle error from GetGasLimit | ||
| gasLimit, gasLimitErr := tx.GetGasLimit() | ||
| if gasLimitErr != nil { | ||
| return appmanager.TxResult{ | ||
| Error: gasLimitErr, | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if recoveryError != nil { | ||
| return appmanager.TxResult{ | ||
| Error: recoveryError, | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Refactor to handle recoveryError more effectively in deliverTx.
- var recoveryError error
- defer func() {
- if r := recover(); r != nil {
- recoveryError = fmt.Errorf("panic during transaction execution: %s", r)
- fmt.Println(recoveryError)
- }
- }()
- if recoveryError != nil {
- return appmanager.TxResult{
- Error: recoveryError,
- }
- }
+ defer func() {
+ if r := recover(); r != nil {
+ err := fmt.Errorf("panic during transaction execution: %s", r)
+ fmt.Println(err)
+ // Consider setting an error in the context or handling it appropriately
+ }
+ }()Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| // recover in the case of a panic | |
| var recoveryError error | |
| defer func() { | |
| if r := recover(); r != nil { | |
| recoveryError = fmt.Errorf("panic during transaction execution: %s", r) | |
| fmt.Println(recoveryError) | |
| } | |
| }() | |
| // handle error from GetGasLimit | |
| gasLimit, gasLimitErr := tx.GetGasLimit() | |
| if gasLimitErr != nil { | |
| return appmanager.TxResult{ | |
| Error: gasLimitErr, | |
| } | |
| } | |
| if recoveryError != nil { | |
| return appmanager.TxResult{ | |
| Error: recoveryError, | |
| } | |
| } | |
| // recover in the case of a panic | |
| defer func() { | |
| if r := recover(); r != nil { | |
| err := fmt.Errorf("panic during transaction execution: %s", r) | |
| fmt.Println(err) | |
| // Consider setting an error in the context or handling it appropriately | |
| } | |
| }() | |
| // handle error from GetGasLimit | |
| gasLimit, gasLimitErr := tx.GetGasLimit() | |
| if gasLimitErr != nil { | |
| return appmanager.TxResult{ | |
| Error: gasLimitErr, | |
| } | |
| } |
|
|
||
| // All possible execution modes. | ||
| const ( | ||
| ExecModeCheck ExecMode = iota |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No, let's please not break, we try to keep them in sync (so we can just cast them). See
cosmos-sdk/core/transaction/service.go
Lines 8 to 20 in fc84ff6
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Out of diff range and nitpick comments (1)
server/v2/stf/stf.go (1)
497-509: TheRunWithCtxmethod is marked for removal and is intended for genesis-related operations. It's important to ensure that this method is either properly documented or removed as planned to avoid misuse.Consider adding more documentation or accelerating the removal process for the
RunWithCtxmethod to prevent potential misuse.
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- .github/workflows/v2-test.yml (1 hunks)
- core/context/context.go (1 hunks)
- server/v2/stf/branch/changeset.go (1 hunks)
- server/v2/stf/stf.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- .github/workflows/v2-test.yml
- core/context/context.go
Additional Context Used
Path-based Instructions (2)
server/v2/stf/branch/changeset.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.server/v2/stf/stf.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Additional comments not posted (35)
server/v2/stf/branch/changeset.go (9)
20-27: The implementation ofchangeSetusingtidwall/btreefor performance reasons is well justified in the comments. Good documentation practice.
29-36: ThenewChangeSetfunction correctly initializes achangeSetwith a B-tree configured with the specified degree and no locks. This setup is appropriate for performance-critical paths.
39-42: Thesetmethod efficiently adds or updates key-value pairs in the B-tree. This method is crucial for the change set's functionality.
44-48: Thegetmethod is implemented correctly to retrieve values based on keys. The method handles the case where a key might not be found, which is good practice for robustness.
50-54: Thedeletemethod cleverly reuses thesetmethod to remove a key by setting its value tonil. This reuse of code is a good practice for maintainability.
56-63: Theiteratormethod correctly handles empty keys as errors, which aligns with the error handling strategy documented in the code. This consistency in error handling is crucial for preventing bugs related to invalid input.
65-73: ThereverseIteratormethod mirrors theiteratormethod in handling empty keys as errors and provides the functionality to iterate in reverse order. This method is well-implemented and follows the same robust error handling as theiterator.
75-89: Theitemstruct and its associated methods (byKeysandnewItem) are well-defined. ThebyKeysfunction provides a necessary comparison logic for the B-tree, andnewItemsimplifies item creation.
91-230: ThememIteratorclass provides comprehensive functionality for iterating over items in the B-tree. Methods likeNext,Valid, andkeyInRangeare crucial for its operation. The use ofpanicinassertValidmight be risky, but it's justified by the need to fail fast in case of iterator misuse.server/v2/stf/stf.go (26)
20-37: TheSTFstruct is well-organized with clear separation of concerns among its methods and fields. The addition of new fields likepostTxExec,makeGasMeter, andmakeGasMeteredStateenhances its functionality to support transaction execution and gas metering.
39-64: TheNewSTFconstructor function is correctly setting up anSTFinstance with all necessary handlers and functions. The use of generic typeTfor transactions ensures flexibility and type safety.
66-149: TheDeliverBlockmethod is a comprehensive implementation covering all aspects of block processing, including pre-block, transaction execution, and post-block operations. The method handles errors and context cancellation effectively, ensuring robustness.
151-196: ThedeliverTxmethod includes detailed error handling and recovery logic, which is crucial for transaction execution reliability. The method's structure allows for clear understanding and maintenance.
198-222: ThevalidateTxmethod efficiently handles transaction validation with gas metering. The separation of validation logic into its own method enhances modularity and clarity.
224-278: TheexecTxmethod is well-implemented with clear separation of concerns for transaction execution and post-transaction handling. The method's error handling and state management are robust, ensuring transaction integrity.
280-313: TherunTxMsgsmethod effectively processes transaction messages and handles errors appropriately. The method's implementation is straightforward and efficient.
315-332: ThepreBlockmethod is correctly implemented to handle pre-block logic. The method's error handling and event management are well done.
334-348: TherunConsensusMessagesmethod efficiently handles consensus-related messages. The method is simple and effective, with appropriate error handling.
350-366: ThebeginBlockmethod is well-structured to handle the beginning of a block. The method's implementation is clear and maintains consistency with event handling.
368-391: TheendBlockmethod effectively concludes block processing with validator updates and event management. The method's implementation is robust and well-documented.
393-402: ThevalidatorUpdatesmethod correctly retrieves and applies validator updates. The method is concise and effectively integrates with theendBlockmethod.
406-421: ThesetHeaderInfomethod is crucial for setting block header information in the state. The method handles potential errors effectively and ensures that the header information is correctly stored.
423-439: ThegetHeaderInfomethod retrieves block header information from the state. The method is well-implemented with appropriate error handling and data retrieval logic.
441-456: TheSimulatemethod provides functionality to simulate transaction execution. The method is well-structured and uses thedeliverTxmethod effectively for simulation purposes.
458-473: TheValidateTxmethod focuses solely on transaction validation. The method is clear and concise, providing an efficient way to validate transactions without executing them.
475-491: TheQuerymethod handles state queries effectively. The method is well-implemented, ensuring that queries are executed with the correct context and gas limits.
493-495: TheMessagemethod provides a straightforward way to handle messages. The method is simple and effectively delegates message handling to thehandleMsgfunction.
511-526: Theclonemethod correctly duplicates theSTFinstance. This method is essential for creating independent copies of the state transition framework, ensuring that changes in one instance do not affect others.
528-619: TheexecutionContextstruct is well-designed to encapsulate all necessary information for transaction execution. The struct includes fields for managing state, gas metering, and events, which are crucial for the execution process.
553-556: ThesetHeaderInfomethod in theexecutionContextclass correctly sets the header information for the current execution context. This method is crucial for ensuring that the context has the correct block information.
558-565: ThesetGasLimitmethod effectively updates the gas limit for the execution context. This method is essential for managing gas usage during transaction execution.
567-592: ThemakeContextmethod efficiently creates a new execution context for transaction processing. The method is well-implemented, providing a clear and concise way to generate new contexts.
594-619: ThenewExecutionContextconstructor function correctly initializes an execution context with all necessary components. This method is crucial for setting up the context for transaction execution.
621-631: TheapplyStateChangesmethod effectively applies state changes from one store to another. This method is essential for ensuring that state changes are correctly propagated during transaction processing.
633-641: TheisCtxCancelledmethod correctly checks if the context has been cancelled. This method is crucial for handling cancellation and ensuring that operations are not performed on a cancelled context.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- core/header/service.go (2 hunks)
- core/header/service_test.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- core/header/service.go
- core/header/service_test.go
Description
This pr bring stf to main from the server_modular branch.
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeCHANGELOG.mdReviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
changeSetstructure for improved key-value pair caching and traversal within the app.STF) with additional functionalities for transaction execution and block processing.Enhancements
STFwith more comprehensive gas metering and state management capabilities.Documentation