-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: simulate nested messages #20291
Conversation
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe recent changes enhance the Changes
Sequence DiagramsSimulate Nested Messages FlowsequenceDiagram
participant User
participant SimApp
participant BaseApp
participant Codec
User->>SimApp: Call NewSimApp with nested messages options
SimApp->>BaseApp: Initialize with options
BaseApp->>Codec: Process nested messages
Codec-->>BaseApp: Return processed messages
BaseApp-->>SimApp: Initialization complete
User->>BaseApp: Submit transaction with nested messages
BaseApp->>BaseApp: simulateNestedMessages
BaseApp-->>User: Return simulation result
Transaction Processing with Nested MessagessequenceDiagram
participant User
participant BaseApp
participant MsgHandler
participant GasMeter
User->>BaseApp: Submit transaction
BaseApp->>BaseApp: runTx
BaseApp->>MsgHandler: Process nested messages
MsgHandler-->>BaseApp: Return processed results
BaseApp->>GasMeter: Calculate gas for nested messages
GasMeter-->>BaseApp: Return gas info
BaseApp-->>User: Return transaction result
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
@@ -810,6 +812,10 @@ func (app *BaseApp) endBlock(ctx context.Context) (sdk.EndBlock, error) { | |||
return endblock, nil | |||
} | |||
|
|||
type HasNestedMsgs interface { | |||
GetMsgs() ([]sdk.Msg, error) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure whats the best place to define this 🤨
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it is a good practice to define the type where it is used. You can also consider making it private or inline it into the function where it is used. In this case there is the same interface in types called HasMsgs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
hmm HasMsgs
is pretty similar but doesn't return an error. I think it was designed with tx in mind.
Line 48 in 83c4b9b
GetMsgs() []Msg |
Makes me wonder if we should update
HasMsgs
or stick with this 'duplicate'. If we opt for both interfaces, baseapp is not the ideal place for HasNestedMsgs
as it may be useful for ante handlers.@tac0turtle @julienrbrt
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what is the possible error that would be returned here? feel like it wouldnt return an error and just be length of 0
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Opted for that because current messages with nested messages within the SDK have defined that method:
cosmos-sdk/x/gov/types/v1/proposal.go
Lines 62 to 65 in e8222c8
// GetMessages returns the proposal messages | |
func (p Proposal) GetMsgs() ([]sdk.Msg, error) { | |
return sdktx.GetMsgs(p.Messages, "sdk.MsgProposal") | |
} |
cosmos-sdk/x/group/proposal.go
Lines 10 to 13 in b536d11
// GetMsgs unpacks p.Messages Any's into sdk.Msg's | |
func (p *Proposal) GetMsgs() ([]sdk.Msg, error) { | |
return tx.GetMsgs(p.Messages, "proposal") | |
} |
I guess we should standardise this and document it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 7
Out of diff range and nitpick comments (4)
baseapp/testutil/messages.proto (2)
37-43
: Ensure theMsgSend
message fields are adequately documented for better maintainability.
47-52
: Consider adding documentation for theMsgNestedMessages
message to explain the purpose and usage of each field.baseapp/baseapp.go (2)
16-16
: Consider organizing imports to improve readability.
20-20
: Consider organizing imports to improve readability.
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
baseapp/testutil/messages.pb.go
is excluded by!**/*.pb.go
Files selected for processing (5)
- baseapp/abci_test.go (2 hunks)
- baseapp/baseapp.go (4 hunks)
- baseapp/testutil/messages.go (3 hunks)
- baseapp/testutil/messages.proto (2 hunks)
- baseapp/utils_test.go (2 hunks)
Additional Context Used
Path-based Instructions (4)
baseapp/testutil/messages.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go
: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.baseapp/utils_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go
: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go
: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"baseapp/baseapp.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go
: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.baseapp/abci_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go
: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go
: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
Additional comments not posted (6)
baseapp/testutil/messages.proto (2)
68-70
: LGTM! TheSend
service is correctly defined to handleMsgSend
.
72-74
: LGTM! TheNestedMessages
service is correctly defined to handleMsgNestedMessages
.baseapp/testutil/messages.go (2)
20-21
: LGTM! The new messagesMsgNestedMessages
andMsgSend
are correctly registered.
27-28
: LGTM! The message service descriptions forMsgNestedMessages
andMsgSend
are correctly registered.baseapp/baseapp.go (2)
815-817
: Ensure all implementations ofHasNestedMsgs
properly handle errors returned byGetMsgs()
.
Line range hint
1-1124
: The structure and formatting of the file are consistent and well-integrated with the existing code.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
Additional Context Used
Path-based Instructions (1)
CHANGELOG.md (1)
Pattern
**/*.md
: "Assess the documentation for misspellings, grammatical errors, missing documentation and correctness"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- baseapp/abci_test.go (2 hunks)
- baseapp/utils_test.go (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- baseapp/abci_test.go
- baseapp/utils_test.go
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
Additional Context Used
Path-based Instructions (1)
CHANGELOG.md (1)
Pattern
**/*.md
: "Assess the documentation for misspellings, grammatical errors, missing documentation and correctness"
Additional comments not posted (1)
CHANGELOG.md (1)
45-45
: Ensure the entry for the nested messages feature is clear and concise.This entry correctly links the PR and describes the feature added. It's important for tracking changes and functionalities introduced in the system.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
- baseapp/abci_test.go (2 hunks)
- baseapp/baseapp.go (4 hunks)
- baseapp/utils_test.go (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- baseapp/baseapp.go
- baseapp/utils_test.go
Additional Context Used
GitHub Check Runs (1)
golangci-lint failure (3)
baseapp/abci_test.go: [failure] 773-773:
undefined: abci.RequestInitChain (typecheck)
Path-based Instructions (2)
baseapp/abci_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go
: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go
: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"CHANGELOG.md (1)
Pattern
**/*.md
: "Assess the documentation for misspellings, grammatical errors, missing documentation and correctness"
Additional comments not posted (1)
CHANGELOG.md (1)
45-45
: The changelog entry for simulating nested messages is clear and correctly linked to the PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good start! 🏄
I added some nits and personal preference but I noticed that I have some context missing for a proper review. Are the other PRs coming for check and deliver TX?
wantErr bool | ||
}{ | ||
{ | ||
name: "ok nested message", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: if you use a map[string]struct{} for the tests spec, you can avoid the name attribute and use the map key instead
@@ -810,6 +812,10 @@ func (app *BaseApp) endBlock(ctx context.Context) (sdk.EndBlock, error) { | |||
return endblock, nil | |||
} | |||
|
|||
type HasNestedMsgs interface { | |||
GetMsgs() ([]sdk.Msg, error) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it is a good practice to define the type where it is used. You can also consider making it private or inline it into the function where it is used. In this case there is the same interface in types called HasMsgs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- baseapp/abci_test.go (2 hunks)
- baseapp/baseapp.go (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- baseapp/abci_test.go
- baseapp/baseapp.go
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- baseapp/abci_test.go (3 hunks)
- baseapp/baseapp.go (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- baseapp/abci_test.go
- baseapp/baseapp.go
I don't think there'll be more prs. This is just for simulation which just runs runTx cosmos-sdk/baseapp/test_helpers.go Lines 26 to 30 in c4308d2
|
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
baseapp/baseapp.go (1)
817-819
: Interface Definition for Nested Messages.The
HasNestedMsgs
interface is well-defined and serves its purpose for objects that can return nested messages. However, consider merging this functionality with the existingHasMsgs
interface if they are sufficiently similar to avoid redundancy.baseapp/abci_test.go (1)
767-775
: Consider using a helper function for error handling.The function
anyMessage
marshals a message and directly usesrequire.NoError
for error handling. This approach is fine for tests, but it could be improved by handling the error more gracefully or by using a helper function that returns an error which can then be handled appropriately in the calling test case.
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
- baseapp/abci_test.go (3 hunks)
- baseapp/baseapp.go (4 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (3)
baseapp/baseapp.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go
: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.baseapp/abci_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go
: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go
: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"CHANGELOG.md (1)
Pattern
**/*.md
: "Assess the documentation for misspellings, grammatical errors, missing documentation and correctness"
GitHub Check: tests (03)
baseapp/baseapp.go
[failure] 1109-1109:
cannot use msgsV2 (variable of type []protoreflect.ProtoMessage) as []protoreflect.Message value in argument to app.runMsgs
[failure] 1109-1109:
cannot use msgsV2 (variable of type []protoreflect.ProtoMessage) as []protoreflect.Message value in argument to app.runMsgs
GitHub Check: tests (02)
baseapp/baseapp.go
[failure] 1109-1109:
cannot use msgsV2 (variable of type []protoreflect.ProtoMessage) as []protoreflect.Message value in argument to app.runMsgs
[failure] 1109-1109:
cannot use msgsV2 (variable of type []protoreflect.ProtoMessage) as []protoreflect.Message value in argument to app.runMsgs
GitHub Check: tests (01)
baseapp/baseapp.go
[failure] 1109-1109:
cannot use msgsV2 (variable of type []protoreflect.ProtoMessage) as []protoreflect.Message value in argument to app.runMsgs
[failure] 1109-1109:
cannot use msgsV2 (variable of type []protoreflect.ProtoMessage) as []protoreflect.Message value in argument to app.runMsgs
GitHub Check: tests (00)
baseapp/baseapp.go
[failure] 1109-1109:
cannot use msgsV2 (variable of type []protoreflect.ProtoMessage) as []protoreflect.Message value in argument to app.runMsgs
[failure] 1109-1109:
cannot use msgsV2 (variable of type []protoreflect.ProtoMessage) as []protoreflect.Message value in argument to app.runMsgs
[failure] 1109-1109:
cannot use msgsV2 (variable of type []protoreflect.ProtoMessage) as []protoreflect.Message value in argument to app.runMsgs
[failure] 1109-1109:
cannot use msgsV2 (variable of type []protoreflect.ProtoMessage) as []protoreflect.Message value in argument to app.runMsgs
GitHub Check: golangci-lint
baseapp/baseapp.go
[failure] 1109-1109:
cannot use msgsV2 (variable of type []protoreflect.ProtoMessage) as []protoreflect.Message value in argument to app.runMsgs) (typecheck)
[failure] 1109-1109:
cannot use msgsV2 (variable of type []protoreflect.ProtoMessage) as []protoreflect.Message value in argument to app.runMsgs) (typecheck)
[failure] 1109-1109:
cannot use msgsV2 (variable of type []protoreflect.ProtoMessage) as []protoreflect.Message value in argument to app.runMsgs) (typecheck)
GitHub Check: dependency-review
baseapp/baseapp.go
[failure] 1109-1109:
cannot use msgsV2 (variable of type []protoreflect.ProtoMessage) as []protoreflect.Message value in argument to app.runMsgs
golangci-lint
baseapp/abci_test.go
20-20:
abci
redeclared in this block (typecheck)
Markdownlint
CHANGELOG.md
73-73: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
74-74: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
78-78: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
79-79: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
80-80: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
81-81: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
86-86: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
129-129: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
130-130: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
131-131: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
135-135: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
138-138: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
139-139: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
140-140: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
147-147: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
157-157: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
159-159: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
162-162: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
181-181: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
182-182: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
184-184: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
185-185: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
237-237: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
238-238: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
239-239: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
403-403: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
406-406: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
428-428: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
429-429: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
442-442: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
474-474: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
475-475: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
476-476: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
477-477: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
479-479: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
480-480: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
481-481: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
482-482: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
496-496: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
498-498: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
500-500: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
502-502: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
505-505: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
506-506: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
507-507: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
515-515: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
516-516: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
518-518: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
519-519: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
521-521: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
522-522: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
523-523: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
525-525: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
526-526: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
534-534: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
545-545: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
546-546: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
547-547: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
553-553: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
554-554: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
555-555: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
561-561: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
577-577: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
578-578: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
579-579: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
580-580: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
581-581: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
582-582: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
587-587: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
588-588: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
589-589: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
590-590: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
597-597: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
598-598: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
599-599: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
633-633: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
634-634: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
635-635: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
636-636: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
641-641: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
642-642: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
790-790: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
933-933: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
954-954: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
957-957: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
1039-1039: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
1040-1040: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
1041-1041: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
1042-1042: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
1043-1043: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
1044-1044: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
1141-1141: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
1227-1227: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
1273-1273: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
1279-1279: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
1280-1280: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
1281-1281: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
1282-1282: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
1283-1283: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
1284-1284: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
1384-1384: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
1509-1509: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
1510-1510: Expected: 4; Actual: 8 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
1511-1511: Expected: 4; Actual: 8 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
1512-1512: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
1513-1513: Expected: 4; Actual: 8 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
1514-1514: Expected: 4; Actual: 8 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
1515-1515: Expected: 4; Actual: 8 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
1516-1516: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
1519-1519: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
1520-1520: Expected: 4; Actual: 8 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
1521-1521: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
1522-1522: Expected: 4; Actual: 8 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
1523-1523: Expected: 4; Actual: 8 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
1524-1524: Expected: 4; Actual: 8 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
1773-1773: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
1774-1774: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
1775-1775: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
1776-1776: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
1777-1777: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
1778-1778: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
1888-1888: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2225-2225: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2226-2226: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2227-2227: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2230-2230: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2231-2231: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2232-2232: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2254-2254: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2255-2255: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2256-2256: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2257-2257: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2258-2258: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2266-2266: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2267-2267: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2268-2268: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2269-2269: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2270-2270: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2272-2272: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2273-2273: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2274-2274: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2601-2601: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2602-2602: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2603-2603: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2604-2604: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2605-2605: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2607-2607: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2609-2609: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2610-2610: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2611-2611: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2612-2612: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2613-2613: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2614-2614: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2616-2616: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2617-2617: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2618-2618: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2621-2621: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2622-2622: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2623-2623: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2624-2624: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2625-2625: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2628-2628: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2631-2631: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2634-2634: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2635-2635: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2638-2638: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2645-2645: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2646-2646: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2647-2647: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2648-2648: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2649-2649: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2651-2651: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2652-2652: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2653-2653: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2654-2654: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2655-2655: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2656-2656: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2657-2657: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2658-2658: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2659-2659: Expected: 4; Actual: 8 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2662-2662: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2663-2663: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2664-2664: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2665-2665: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2666-2666: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2667-2667: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2674-2674: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2675-2675: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2676-2676: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2677-2677: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2684-2684: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2686-2686: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2688-2688: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2689-2689: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2690-2690: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2691-2691: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2692-2692: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2693-2693: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2694-2694: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2695-2695: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2696-2696: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2697-2697: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2698-2698: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2699-2699: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2700-2700: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2701-2701: Expected: 4; Actual: 8 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2702-2702: Expected: 4; Actual: 8 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2703-2703: Expected: 4; Actual: 8 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2704-2704: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2705-2705: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2706-2706: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2707-2707: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2708-2708: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2709-2709: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2710-2710: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2711-2711: Expected: 4; Actual: 8 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2712-2712: Expected: 4; Actual: 8 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2713-2713: Expected: 4; Actual: 8 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2714-2714: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2716-2716: Expected: 4; Actual: 8 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2717-2717: Expected: 4; Actual: 8 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2719-2719: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2720-2720: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2721-2721: Expected: 4; Actual: 8 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2722-2722: Expected: 4; Actual: 8 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2723-2723: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2724-2724: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2725-2725: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2728-2728: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2729-2729: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2731-2731: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2732-2732: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2735-2735: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2736-2736: Expected: 4; Actual: 8 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2737-2737: Expected: 4; Actual: 8 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2738-2738: Expected: 4; Actual: 8 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2739-2739: Expected: 4; Actual: 8 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2740-2740: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2741-2741: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2742-2742: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2744-2744: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2745-2745: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2746-2746: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2752-2752: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2755-2755: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2761-2761: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2769-2769: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2770-2770: Expected: 4; Actual: 8 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2771-2771: Expected: 4; Actual: 8 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2772-2772: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2780-2780: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2787-2787: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2788-2788: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2795-2795: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2797-2797: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2801-2801: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2802-2802: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2804-2804: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2812-2812: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2814-2814: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2815-2815: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2821-2821: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2829-2829: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2830-2830: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2831-2831: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2832-2832: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2833-2833: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2834-2834: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2835-2835: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2836-2836: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2837-2837: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2838-2838: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2839-2839: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2840-2840: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2841-2841: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2842-2842: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2844-2844: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2845-2845: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2847-2847: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2848-2848: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2849-2849: Expected: 4; Actual: 8 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2850-2850: Expected: 4; Actual: 8 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2851-2851: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2852-2852: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2853-2853: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2854-2854: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2855-2855: Expected: 4; Actual: 8 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2856-2856: Expected: 4; Actual: 8 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2858-2858: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2859-2859: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2862-2862: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2863-2863: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2864-2864: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2865-2865: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2866-2866: Expected: 4; Actual: 8 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2867-2867: Expected: 4; Actual: 8 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2868-2868: Expected: 4; Actual: 8 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2869-2869: Expected: 4; Actual: 8 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2870-2870: Expected: 4; Actual: 8 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2871-2871: Expected: 4; Actual: 8 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2872-2872: Expected: 4; Actual: 8 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2873-2873: Expected: 4; Actual: 8 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2874-2874: Expected: 4; Actual: 8 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2875-2875: Expected: 4; Actual: 8 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2876-2876: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2877-2877: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2882-2882: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2883-2883: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2884-2884: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2885-2885: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2886-2886: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2887-2887: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2889-2889: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2891-2891: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2905-2905: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2906-2906: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2907-2907: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2912-2912: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2913-2913: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2914-2914: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2918-2918: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2919-2919: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2920-2920: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2921-2921: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2922-2922: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2923-2923: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2926-2926: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2927-2927: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2928-2928: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2929-2929: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2930-2930: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2931-2931: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2932-2932: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2933-2933: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2934-2934: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2936-2936: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2938-2938: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2940-2940: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2945-2945: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2946-2946: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2947-2947: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2948-2948: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2949-2949: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2950-2950: Expected: 4; Actual: 8 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2951-2951: Expected: 4; Actual: 8 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2952-2952: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2953-2953: Expected: 4; Actual: 8 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2954-2954: Expected: 4; Actual: 8 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2955-2955: Expected: 4; Actual: 8 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2956-2956: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2957-2957: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2958-2958: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2959-2959: Expected: 4; Actual: 8 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2960-2960: Expected: 4; Actual: 8 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2961-2961: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2962-2962: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2963-2963: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2964-2964: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
2965-2965: Expected: 2; Actual: 4 (MD007, ul-indent)
Unordered list indentation
191-191: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces
234-234: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces
1143-1143: null (MD024, no-duplicate-heading)
Multiple headings with the same content
1933-1933: null (MD024, no-duplicate-heading)
Multiple headings with the same content
1691-1691: null (MD034, no-bare-urls)
Bare URL used
1721-1721: null (MD034, no-bare-urls)
Bare URL used
2668-2668: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers
2756-2756: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers
2758-2758: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers
2763-2763: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers
2765-2765: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers
2775-2775: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers
2777-2777: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers
2782-2782: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers
2790-2790: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers
2807-2807: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers
2809-2809: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers
2817-2817: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers
2823-2823: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers
2893-2893: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers
2896-2896: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers
2899-2899: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers
2901-2901: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers
2941-2941: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers
1062-1062: null (MD038, no-space-in-code)
Spaces inside code span elements
2709-2709: null (MD038, no-space-in-code)
Spaces inside code span elements
2709-2709: null (MD038, no-space-in-code)
Spaces inside code span elements
Additional comments not posted (7)
baseapp/baseapp.go (2)
16-20
: Ensure appropriate usage of new imports.The new imports (
anyutil
,proto
,anypb
) have been added to support the handling of nested messages and their serialization. It's crucial to ensure that these libraries are used securely and efficiently throughout the codebase.
1081-1111
: Nested Message Simulation LogicThe method
simulateNestedMessages
recursively simulates nested messages. This is a critical piece of functionality for the feature introduced in this PR. Ensure that the recursion does not lead to performance issues or stack overflows with deeply nested structures.Tools
GitHub Check: tests (03)
[failure] 1109-1109:
cannot use msgsV2 (variable of type []protoreflect.ProtoMessage) as []protoreflect.Message value in argument to app.runMsgs
[failure] 1109-1109:
cannot use msgsV2 (variable of type []protoreflect.ProtoMessage) as []protoreflect.Message value in argument to app.runMsgsGitHub Check: tests (02)
[failure] 1109-1109:
cannot use msgsV2 (variable of type []protoreflect.ProtoMessage) as []protoreflect.Message value in argument to app.runMsgs
[failure] 1109-1109:
cannot use msgsV2 (variable of type []protoreflect.ProtoMessage) as []protoreflect.Message value in argument to app.runMsgsGitHub Check: tests (01)
[failure] 1109-1109:
cannot use msgsV2 (variable of type []protoreflect.ProtoMessage) as []protoreflect.Message value in argument to app.runMsgs
[failure] 1109-1109:
cannot use msgsV2 (variable of type []protoreflect.ProtoMessage) as []protoreflect.Message value in argument to app.runMsgsGitHub Check: tests (00)
[failure] 1109-1109:
cannot use msgsV2 (variable of type []protoreflect.ProtoMessage) as []protoreflect.Message value in argument to app.runMsgs
[failure] 1109-1109:
cannot use msgsV2 (variable of type []protoreflect.ProtoMessage) as []protoreflect.Message value in argument to app.runMsgs
[failure] 1109-1109:
cannot use msgsV2 (variable of type []protoreflect.ProtoMessage) as []protoreflect.Message value in argument to app.runMsgs
[failure] 1109-1109:
cannot use msgsV2 (variable of type []protoreflect.ProtoMessage) as []protoreflect.Message value in argument to app.runMsgsGitHub Check: golangci-lint
[failure] 1109-1109:
cannot use msgsV2 (variable of type []protoreflect.ProtoMessage) as []protoreflect.Message value in argument to app.runMsgs) (typecheck)
[failure] 1109-1109:
cannot use msgsV2 (variable of type []protoreflect.ProtoMessage) as []protoreflect.Message value in argument to app.runMsgs) (typecheck)
[failure] 1109-1109:
cannot use msgsV2 (variable of type []protoreflect.ProtoMessage) as []protoreflect.Message value in argument to app.runMsgs) (typecheck)GitHub Check: dependency-review
[failure] 1109-1109:
cannot use msgsV2 (variable of type []protoreflect.ProtoMessage) as []protoreflect.Message value in argument to app.runMsgsbaseapp/abci_test.go (1)
777-923
: Review the use of table-driven tests for clarity and maintainability.The test function
TestABCI_Query_SimulateNestedMessagesTx
uses a table-driven approach, which is good for maintainability. However, ensure that the test cases cover all relevant scenarios for nested messages, including edge cases. Additionally, consider adding more detailed inline comments explaining the purpose of each test case, especially for complex scenarios like nested messages.CHANGELOG.md (4)
45-45
: Entry looks good!The changelog entry for the
baseapp
feature correctly references the PR and describes the new functionality.
45-45
: Entry looks good!The changelog entry for the
client
feature is clear and correctly linked to its PR.
45-45
: Entry looks good!The changelog entry for the
tests
feature is appropriately detailed and linked.
45-45
: Entry looks good!The changelog entry for the
runtime
feature is clear and correctly linked to its PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the updates. I think the gas refund may create some issues with the current implementatio.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
- baseapp/baseapp.go (5 hunks)
- simapp/app.go (1 hunks)
- simapp/app_di.go (2 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (4)
simapp/app_di.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go
: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.simapp/app.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go
: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.baseapp/baseapp.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go
: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.CHANGELOG.md (1)
Pattern
**/*.md
: "Assess the documentation for misspellings, grammatical errors, missing documentation and correctness"
Additional comments not posted (5)
simapp/app_di.go (1)
243-244
: Verify the addition ofSetExcludeNestedMsgsGas
function.The
SetExcludeNestedMsgsGas
function has been added tobaseAppOptions
. Ensure that this function is correctly implemented and integrated.Verification successful
The
SetExcludeNestedMsgsGas
function is correctly implemented and integrated.The
SetExcludeNestedMsgsGas
function is defined inbaseapp/options.go
and is used appropriately insimapp/app_di.go
,simapp/app.go
, and other relevant files. The review comment regarding its addition tobaseAppOptions
is accurate.
- Implementation found in:
baseapp/options.go
- Usage found in:
simapp/app_di.go
,simapp/app.go
,baseapp/abci_test.go
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of `SetExcludeNestedMsgsGas` function. # Test: Search for the function implementation. Expect: Correct implementation and integration. rg --type go --pattern 'func SetExcludeNestedMsgsGas'Length of output: 467
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation and usage of `SetExcludeNestedMsgsGas` function. # Test: Search for the function implementation. Expect: Correct implementation and integration. rg 'func SetExcludeNestedMsgsGas' # Test: Search for the usage of `SetExcludeNestedMsgsGas` in the codebase. rg 'SetExcludeNestedMsgsGas'Length of output: 728
simapp/app.go (1)
249-250
: Verify the addition ofSetExcludeNestedMsgsGas
function.The
SetExcludeNestedMsgsGas
function has been added tobaseAppOptions
. Ensure that this function is correctly implemented and integrated.Verification successful
Verify the addition of
SetExcludeNestedMsgsGas
function.The
SetExcludeNestedMsgsGas
function is correctly implemented inbaseapp/options.go
and properly integrated intobaseAppOptions
.
- Implementation of
SetExcludeNestedMsgsGas
found inbaseapp/options.go
:func SetExcludeNestedMsgsGas(msgs []sdk.Msg) func(*BaseApp) { return func(app *BaseApp) { app.excludeNestedMsgsGas = make(map[string]struct{}) for _, msg := range msgs { if _, ok := msg.(HasNestedMsgs); !ok { continue } app.excludeNestedMsgsGas[sdk.MsgTypeURL(msg)] = struct{}{} } } }Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of `SetExcludeNestedMsgsGas` function. # Test: Search for the function implementation. Expect: Correct implementation and integration. rg --type go --pattern 'func SetExcludeNestedMsgsGas'Length of output: 467
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of `SetExcludeNestedMsgsGas` function. # Test: Search for the function implementation. Expect: Correct implementation and integration. rg 'func SetExcludeNestedMsgsGas' --type goLength of output: 126
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Retrieve the full implementation of the `SetExcludeNestedMsgsGas` function. # Test: Extract the function implementation. Expect: Complete function implementation. rg 'func SetExcludeNestedMsgsGas' -A 20 --type go baseapp/options.goLength of output: 556
baseapp/baseapp.go (2)
239-241
: LGTM! The initialization ofexcludeNestedMsgsGas
is correct.The added code ensures that the
excludeNestedMsgsGas
map is initialized if it is nil, preventing potential nil pointer dereference errors.
967-978
: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The code changes are approved. The added code correctly simulates nested messages and handles gas refunds during the simulation mode.
However, ensure that the
simulateNestedMessages
function is used appropriately in the codebase.Verification successful
Function usage verified
The function
simulateNestedMessages
is used appropriately within the codebase.
baseapp/baseapp.go
: The function is defined and used within the same file.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `simulateNestedMessages` function. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Occurrences in appropriate contexts. rg --type go $'simulateNestedMessages'Length of output: 355
CHANGELOG.md (1)
45-45
: Correctness of the changelog entry.The changelog entry for simulating nested messages is correct and follows the format used for other features.
baseapp/baseapp.go
Outdated
// simulateNestedMessages simulates a message nested messages. | ||
func (app *BaseApp) simulateNestedMessages(ctx sdk.Context, msg sdk.Msg) error { | ||
nestedMsgs, ok := msg.(HasNestedMsgs) | ||
if !ok { | ||
return nil | ||
} | ||
|
||
msgs, err := nestedMsgs.GetMsgs() | ||
if err != nil { | ||
return err | ||
} | ||
|
||
for _, msg := range msgs { | ||
err = app.simulateNestedMessages(ctx, msg) | ||
if err != nil { | ||
return err | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
if err := validateBasicTxMsgs(app.msgServiceRouter, msgs); err != nil { | ||
return err | ||
} | ||
|
||
protoMessages := make([]protoreflect.Message, len(msgs)) | ||
for i, msg := range msgs { | ||
_, protoMsg, err := app.cdc.GetMsgSigners(msg) | ||
if err != nil { | ||
return err | ||
} | ||
protoMessages[i] = protoMsg | ||
} | ||
|
||
_, err = app.runMsgs(ctx, msgs, protoMessages, execModeSimulate) | ||
return err | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider adding a recursion depth limit or converting to an iterative approach.
The simulateNestedMessages
function uses recursion to handle nested messages. The depth of recursion could potentially lead to stack overflow errors with deeply nested structures. Consider adding a recursion depth limit or converting this to an iterative approach using a stack data structure to enhance robustness.
func (app *BaseApp) simulateNestedMessages(ctx sdk.Context, msg sdk.Msg) error {
+ const maxRecursionDepth = 100
+ return app.simulateNestedMessagesHelper(ctx, msg, 0, maxRecursionDepth)
}
+func (app *BaseApp) simulateNestedMessagesHelper(ctx sdk.Context, msg sdk.Msg, depth, maxDepth int) error {
+ if depth > maxDepth {
+ return errors.New("max recursion depth exceeded")
+ }
nestedMsgs, ok := msg.(HasNestedMsgs)
if !ok {
return nil
}
msgs, err := nestedMsgs.GetMsgs()
if err != nil {
return err
}
for _, msg := range msgs {
- err = app.simulateNestedMessages(ctx, msg)
+ err = app.simulateNestedMessagesHelper(ctx, msg, depth+1, maxDepth)
if err != nil {
return err
}
}
if err := validateBasicTxMsgs(app.msgServiceRouter, msgs); err != nil {
return err
}
protoMessages := make([]protoreflect.Message, len(msgs))
for i, msg := range msgs {
_, protoMsg, err := app.cdc.GetMsgSigners(msg)
if err != nil {
return err
}
protoMessages[i] = protoMsg
}
_, err = app.runMsgs(ctx, msgs, protoMessages, execModeSimulate)
return err
}
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
// simulateNestedMessages simulates a message nested messages. | |
func (app *BaseApp) simulateNestedMessages(ctx sdk.Context, msg sdk.Msg) error { | |
nestedMsgs, ok := msg.(HasNestedMsgs) | |
if !ok { | |
return nil | |
} | |
msgs, err := nestedMsgs.GetMsgs() | |
if err != nil { | |
return err | |
} | |
for _, msg := range msgs { | |
err = app.simulateNestedMessages(ctx, msg) | |
if err != nil { | |
return err | |
} | |
} | |
if err := validateBasicTxMsgs(app.msgServiceRouter, msgs); err != nil { | |
return err | |
} | |
protoMessages := make([]protoreflect.Message, len(msgs)) | |
for i, msg := range msgs { | |
_, protoMsg, err := app.cdc.GetMsgSigners(msg) | |
if err != nil { | |
return err | |
} | |
protoMessages[i] = protoMsg | |
} | |
_, err = app.runMsgs(ctx, msgs, protoMessages, execModeSimulate) | |
return err | |
} | |
// simulateNestedMessages simulates a message nested messages. | |
func (app *BaseApp) simulateNestedMessages(ctx sdk.Context, msg sdk.Msg) error { | |
const maxRecursionDepth = 100 | |
return app.simulateNestedMessagesHelper(ctx, msg, 0, maxRecursionDepth) | |
} | |
func (app *BaseApp) simulateNestedMessagesHelper(ctx sdk.Context, msg sdk.Msg, depth, maxDepth int) error { | |
if depth > maxDepth { | |
return errors.New("max recursion depth exceeded") | |
} | |
nestedMsgs, ok := msg.(HasNestedMsgs) | |
if (!ok) { | |
return nil | |
} | |
msgs, err := nestedMsgs.GetMsgs() | |
if (err != nil) { | |
return err | |
} | |
for _, msg := range msgs { | |
err = app.simulateNestedMessagesHelper(ctx, msg, depth+1, maxDepth) | |
if (err != nil) { | |
return err | |
} | |
} | |
if err := validateBasicTxMsgs(app.msgServiceRouter, msgs); err != nil { | |
return err | |
} | |
protoMessages := make([]protoreflect.Message, len(msgs)) | |
for i, msg := range msgs { | |
_, protoMsg, err := app.cdc.GetMsgSigners(msg) | |
if (err != nil) { | |
return err | |
} | |
protoMessages[i] = protoMsg | |
} | |
_, err = app.runMsgs(ctx, msgs, protoMessages, execModeSimulate) | |
return err | |
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (2)
baseapp/options.go (1)
123-133
: LGTM! But consider adding a log message for debugging.The function correctly filters messages that implement the
HasNestedMsgs
interface. For better debugging, consider adding a log message when a message does not implement the required interface.+ if _, ok := msg.(HasNestedMsgs); !ok { + log.Warn("Message does not implement HasNestedMsgs", "msg", msg) + continue + }baseapp/abci_test.go (1)
775-919
: Comprehensive test function for nested message simulation.The function covers various edge cases effectively. Consider using more descriptive names for the test cases to improve readability.
- name: "ok nested message" + name: "valid nested message with correct signers and amount" - name: "different signers" + name: "invalid nested message with different signers" - name: "empty from" + name: "invalid nested message with empty from address" - name: "empty to" + name: "invalid nested message with empty to address" - name: "negative amount" + name: "invalid nested message with negative amount" - name: "with nested messages" + name: "valid nested message containing another valid message" - name: "with invalid nested messages" + name: "invalid nested message containing another invalid message" - name: "with different signer" + name: "invalid nested message containing a message with different signer"
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- baseapp/abci_test.go (3 hunks)
- baseapp/baseapp.go (5 hunks)
- baseapp/options.go (1 hunks)
- simapp/app_di.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- baseapp/baseapp.go
- simapp/app_di.go
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (2)
baseapp/options.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go
: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.baseapp/abci_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go
: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go
: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
Additional comments not posted (2)
baseapp/abci_test.go (2)
765-773
: Helper functionanyMessage
is well-implemented.The function correctly marshals the message and sets the
TypeUrl
. Ensure that thecodec.Codec
used handles all necessary message types.
921-997
: Well-structured test function for nested message gas simulation.The function effectively tests different scenarios for gas consumption, including both inclusion and exclusion of nested message gas.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
@@ -186,6 +186,9 @@ type BaseApp struct { | |||
// including the goroutine handling.This is experimental and must be enabled | |||
// by developers. | |||
optimisticExec *oe.OptimisticExecution | |||
|
|||
// includeNestedMsgsGas holds a set of message types for which gas costs for its nested messages are calculated. | |||
includeNestedMsgsGas map[string]struct{} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can we show an example of this being set?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
left two comments, otherwise look good to me
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice work! 💪
I could not find the integration in simapp to make use of the new feature. Are you planning a new PR?
return func(app *BaseApp) { | ||
app.includeNestedMsgsGas = make(map[string]struct{}) | ||
for _, msg := range msgs { | ||
if _, ok := msg.(HasNestedMsgs); !ok { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 good to check
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (16)
UPGRADING.md (16)
8-9
: Add a blank line after the heading.To improve readability, add a blank line after the
BaseApp
heading.### BaseApp #### Nested Messages Simulation
10-18
: Clarify the limitations of the simulation.The paragraph explains the limitations of the simulation but could be clearer about the potential discrepancies between simulation and actual execution.
However, it's important to note that while the simulation can provide valuable insights, it does not guarantee the correct execution of the nested messages in the future. Factors such as changes in the blockchain state or updates to the protocol could potentially affect the actual execution of these nested messages when the transaction is finally processed on the network. + Therefore, developers should use simulation results as guidance rather than definitive outcomes.
26-31
: Clarify the default behavior for gas cost calculation.The paragraph explains the default behavior and customization options for gas cost calculation. Ensure it is clear and concise.
By default, when simulating transactions, the gas cost of nested messages is not calculated. This means that only the gas cost of the top-level message is considered. However, this behavior can be customized using the `SetIncludeNestedMsgsGas` option when building the BaseApp. By providing a list of message types to this option, you can specify which messages should have their nested message gas costs included in the simulation. This allows for more accurate gas estimation for transactions involving specific message types that contain nested messages, while maintaining the default behavior for other message types. + This flexibility enables developers to tailor gas estimation to their specific use cases.
35-39
: Surround fenced code block with blank lines.Ensure the fenced code block is surrounded by blank lines for better readability.
Here is an example on how `SetIncludeNestedMsgsGas` option could be set to calculate the gas of a gov proposal nested messages: + ```go baseAppOptions = append(baseAppOptions, baseapp.SetIncludeNestedMsgsGas([]sdk.Message{&gov.MsgSubmitProposal{}})) // ... app.App = appBuilder.Build(db, traceStore, baseAppOptions...) + ```Tools
Markdownlint
35-35: null
Fenced code blocks should be surrounded by blank lines(MD031, blanks-around-fences)
Line range hint
40-56
: Surround fenced code blocks with blank lines.Ensure the fenced code blocks are surrounded by blank lines for better readability.
The `client` package has been refactored to make use of the address codecs (address, validator address, consensus address, etc.) and address bech32 prefixes (address and validator address). This is part of the work of abstracting the SDK from the global bech32 config. This means the address codecs and prefixes must be provided in the `client.Context` in the application client (usually `root.go`). + ```diff clientCtx = clientCtx. + WithAddressCodec(addressCodec). + WithValidatorAddressCodec(validatorAddressCodec). + WithConsensusAddressCodec(consensusAddressCodec). + WithAddressPrefix("cosmos"). + WithValidatorPrefix("cosmosvaloper") + ``` **When using `depinject` / `app v2`, the client codecs can be provided directly from application config.** Refer to SimApp `root_v2.go` and `root.go` for an example with an app v2 and a legacy app. Additionally, a simplification of the start command leads to the following change: + ```diff - server.AddCommands(rootCmd, newApp, func(startCmd *cobra.Command) {}) + server.AddCommands(rootCmd, newApp, server.StartCmdOptions[servertypes.Application]{}) + ```Tools
LanguageTool
[typographical] ~43-~43: It appears that a comma is missing.
Context: ...AppOptions...) ``` ### SimApp In this section we describe the changes made in Cosmos ...(DURING_THAT_TIME_COMMA)
Markdownlint
35-35: null
Fenced code blocks should be surrounded by blank lines(MD031, blanks-around-fences)
Line range hint
57-63
: Surround fenced code blocks with blank lines.Ensure the fenced code blocks are surrounded by blank lines for better readability.
For non depinject users, simply call `RegisterLegacyAminoCodec` and `RegisterInterfaces` on the module manager: + ```diff -app.BasicModuleManager = module.NewBasicManagerFromManager(...) -app.BasicModuleManager.RegisterLegacyAminoCodec(legacyAmino) -app.BasicModuleManager.RegisterInterfaces(interfaceRegistry) +app.ModuleManager.RegisterLegacyAminoCodec(legacyAmino) +app.ModuleManager.RegisterInterfaces(interfaceRegistry) + ```Tools
LanguageTool
[typographical] ~43-~43: It appears that a comma is missing.
Context: ...AppOptions...) ``` ### SimApp In this section we describe the changes made in Cosmos ...(DURING_THAT_TIME_COMMA)
Markdownlint
35-35: null
Fenced code blocks should be surrounded by blank lines(MD031, blanks-around-fences)
Line range hint
72-89
: Surround fenced code blocks with blank lines.Ensure the fenced code blocks are surrounded by blank lines for better readability.
To enable unordered transactions in your application: + ```go func NewApp(...) *App { // ... // create, start, and load the unordered tx manager utxDataDir := filepath.Join(cast.ToString(appOpts.Get(flags.FlagHome)), "data") app.UnorderedTxManager = unorderedtx.NewManager(utxDataDir) app.UnorderedTxManager.Start() if err := app.UnorderedTxManager.OnInit(); err != nil { panic(fmt.Errorf("failed to initialize unordered tx manager: %w", err)) } } + ``` * Add the decorator to the existing AnteHandler chain, which should be as early as possible. + ```go anteDecorators := []sdk.AnteDecorator{ ante.NewSetUpContextDecorator(), // ... ante.NewUnorderedTxDecorator(unorderedtx.DefaultMaxUnOrderedTTL, app.UnorderedTxManager), // ... } return sdk.ChainAnteDecorators(anteDecorators...), nil + ``` * If the App has a SnapshotManager defined, you must also register the extension for the TxManager. + ```go if manager := app.SnapshotManager(); manager != nil { err := manager.RegisterExtensions(unorderedtx.NewSnapshotter(app.UnorderedTxManager)) if err != nil { panic(fmt.Errorf("failed to register snapshot extension: %s", err)) } } + ```Tools
LanguageTool
[typographical] ~43-~43: It appears that a comma is missing.
Context: ...AppOptions...) ``` ### SimApp In this section we describe the changes made in Cosmos ...(DURING_THAT_TIME_COMMA)
Markdownlint
35-35: null
Fenced code blocks should be surrounded by blank lines(MD031, blanks-around-fences)
Line range hint
92-104
: Surround fenced code blocks with blank lines.Ensure the fenced code blocks are surrounded by blank lines for better readability.
* Create or update the App's `Close()` method to close the unordered tx manager. Note, this is critical as it ensures the manager's state is written to file such that when the node restarts, it can recover the state to provide replay protection. + ```go func (app *App) Close() error { // ... // close the unordered tx manager if e := app.UnorderedTxManager.Close(); e != nil { err = errors.Join(err, e) } return err } + ``` To submit an unordered transaction, the client must set the `unordered` flag to `true` and ensure a reasonable `timeout_height` is set. The `timeout_height` is used as a TTL for the transaction and is used to provide replay protection. See [ADR-070](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/docs/architecture/adr-070-unordered-transactions.md) for more details.Tools
LanguageTool
[typographical] ~43-~43: It appears that a comma is missing.
Context: ...AppOptions...) ``` ### SimApp In this section we describe the changes made in Cosmos ...(DURING_THAT_TIME_COMMA)
Markdownlint
35-35: null
Fenced code blocks should be surrounded by blank lines(MD031, blanks-around-fences)
Line range hint
105-112
: Surround fenced code blocks with blank lines.Ensure the fenced code blocks are surrounded by blank lines for better readability.
It can happen that some modules do not have a store necessary (such as `x/auth/tx` for instance). In this case, the store creation should be skipped in `app_config.go`: + ```diff InitGenesis: []string{ "..." }, + // SkipStoreKeys is an optional list of store keys to skip when constructing the + // module's keeper. This is useful when a module does not have a store key. + SkipStoreKeys: []string{ + "tx", + }, + ```Tools
LanguageTool
[typographical] ~43-~43: It appears that a comma is missing.
Context: ...AppOptions...) ``` ### SimApp In this section we describe the changes made in Cosmos ...(DURING_THAT_TIME_COMMA)
Markdownlint
35-35: null
Fenced code blocks should be surrounded by blank lines(MD031, blanks-around-fences)
Line range hint
113-118
: Surround fenced code blocks with blank lines.Ensure the fenced code blocks are surrounded by blank lines for better readability.
The `cosmossdk.io/api/tendermint` package has been removed as CometBFT now publishes its protos to `buf.build/tendermint` and `buf.build/cometbft`. There is no longer a need for the Cosmos SDK to host these protos for itself and its dependencies. That package containing proto v2 generated code, but the SDK now uses [buf generated go SDK instead](https://buf.build/docs/bsr/generated-sdks/go). If you were depending on `cosmossdk.io/api/tendermint`, please use the buf generated go SDK instead, or ask CometBFT host the generated proto v2 code. + ```diff -func (AppModule) RegisterInterfaces(registry codectypes.InterfaceRegistry) { +func (AppModule) RegisterInterfaces(registry registry.InterfaceRegistrar) { + ``` The signature of the extension interface `HasAminoCodec` has been changed to accept a `cosmossdk.io/core/legacy.Amino` instead of a `codec.LegacyAmino`. Modules should update their `HasAminoCodec` implementation to accept a `cosmossdk.io/core/legacy.Amino` interface. + ```diff -func (AppModule) RegisterLegacyAminoCodec(cdc *codec.LegacyAmino) { +func (AppModule) RegisterLegacyAminoCodec(cdc legacy.Amino) { + ```Tools
LanguageTool
[typographical] ~43-~43: It appears that a comma is missing.
Context: ...AppOptions...) ``` ### SimApp In this section we describe the changes made in Cosmos ...(DURING_THAT_TIME_COMMA)
Markdownlint
35-35: null
Fenced code blocks should be surrounded by blank lines(MD031, blanks-around-fences)
Line range hint
119-124
: Surround fenced code blocks with blank lines.Ensure the fenced code blocks are surrounded by blank lines for better readability.
`MsgSimulatorFn` has been updated to return an error. Its context argument has been removed, and an address.Codec has been added to avoid the use of the Accounts.String() method. + ```diff -type MsgSimulatorFn func(r *rand.Rand, ctx sdk.Context, accs []Account) sdk.Msg +type MsgSimulatorFn func(r *rand.Rand, accs []Account, cdc address.Codec) (sdk.Msg, error) + ```Tools
LanguageTool
[typographical] ~43-~43: It appears that a comma is missing.
Context: ...AppOptions...) ``` ### SimApp In this section we describe the changes made in Cosmos ...(DURING_THAT_TIME_COMMA)
Markdownlint
35-35: null
Fenced code blocks should be surrounded by blank lines(MD031, blanks-around-fences)
Line range hint
125-132
: Surround fenced code blocks with blank lines.Ensure the fenced code blocks are surrounded by blank lines for better readability.
Previously `cosmossdk.io/core` held functions `Invoke`, `Provide` and `Register` were moved to `cosmossdk.io/depinject/appconfig`. All modules using dependency injection must update their imports. + ```diff -type MsgSimulatorFn func(r *rand.Rand, ctx sdk.Context, accs []Account) sdk.Msg +type MsgSimulatorFn func(r *rand.Rand, accs []Account, cdc address.Codec) (sdk.Msg, error) + ```Tools
LanguageTool
[typographical] ~43-~43: It appears that a comma is missing.
Context: ...AppOptions...) ``` ### SimApp In this section we describe the changes made in Cosmos ...(DURING_THAT_TIME_COMMA)
Markdownlint
35-35: null
Fenced code blocks should be surrounded by blank lines(MD031, blanks-around-fences)
Line range hint
133-138
: Surround fenced code blocks with blank lines.Ensure the fenced code blocks are surrounded by blank lines for better readability.
Previous module migrations have been removed. It is required to migrate to v0.50 prior to upgrading to v0.51 for not missing any module migrations. + ```go // InitGenesis performs genesis initialization for the module. func (am AppModule) InitGenesis(ctx context.Context, data json.RawMessage) error { } // ExportGenesis returns the exported genesis state as raw bytes for the module. func (am AppModule) ExportGenesis(ctx context.Context) (json.RawMessage, error) { } + ```Tools
LanguageTool
[typographical] ~43-~43: It appears that a comma is missing.
Context: ...AppOptions...) ``` ### SimApp In this section we describe the changes made in Cosmos ...(DURING_THAT_TIME_COMMA)
Markdownlint
35-35: null
Fenced code blocks should be surrounded by blank lines(MD031, blanks-around-fences)
Line range hint
139-141
: Surround fenced code blocks with blank lines.Ensure the fenced code blocks are surrounded by blank lines for better readability.
Most of Cosmos SDK modules have migrated to [collections](https://docs.cosmos.network/main/build/packages/collections). Many functions have been removed due to this changes as the API can be smaller thanks to collections. For modules that have migrated, verify you are checking against `collections.ErrNotFound` when applicable. + ```go import authkeeper "cosmossdk.io/x/auth/keeper" ... err := authkeeper.MigrateAccountNumberUnsafe(ctx, &app.AuthKeeper) if err != nil { return nil, err } + ```Tools
LanguageTool
[typographical] ~43-~43: It appears that a comma is missing.
Context: ...AppOptions...) ``` ### SimApp In this section we describe the changes made in Cosmos ...(DURING_THAT_TIME_COMMA)
Markdownlint
35-35: null
Fenced code blocks should be surrounded by blank lines(MD031, blanks-around-fences)
Line range hint
142-145
: Surround fenced code blocks with blank lines.Ensure the fenced code blocks are surrounded by blank lines for better readability.
Accounts's AccountNumber will be used as a global account number tracking replacing Auth legacy AccountNumber. Must set accounts's AccountNumber with auth's AccountNumber value in upgrade handler. This is done through auth keeper MigrateAccountNumber function. + ```go import authkeeper "cosmossdk.io/x/auth/keeper" ... err := authkeeper.MigrateAccountNumberUnsafe(ctx, &app.AuthKeeper) if err != nil { return nil, err } + ```Tools
LanguageTool
[typographical] ~43-~43: It appears that a comma is missing.
Context: ...AppOptions...) ``` ### SimApp In this section we describe the changes made in Cosmos ...(DURING_THAT_TIME_COMMA)
Markdownlint
35-35: null
Fenced code blocks should be surrounded by blank lines(MD031, blanks-around-fences)
Line range hint
146-148
: Surround fenced code blocks with blank lines.Ensure the fenced code blocks are surrounded by blank lines for better readability.
Auth was spun out into its own `go.mod`. To import it use `cosmossdk.io/x/auth` + ```go import authkeeper "cosmossdk.io/x/auth/keeper" ... err := authkeeper.MigrateAccountNumberUnsafe(ctx, &app.AuthKeeper) if err != nil { return nil, err } + ```Tools
LanguageTool
[typographical] ~43-~43: It appears that a comma is missing.
Context: ...AppOptions...) ``` ### SimApp In this section we describe the changes made in Cosmos ...(DURING_THAT_TIME_COMMA)
Markdownlint
35-35: null
Fenced code blocks should be surrounded by blank lines(MD031, blanks-around-fences)
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- UPGRADING.md (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
UPGRADING.md (1)
Pattern
**/*.md
: "Assess the documentation for misspellings, grammatical errors, missing documentation and correctness"
Markdownlint
UPGRADING.md
35-35: null
Fenced code blocks should be surrounded by blank lines(MD031, blanks-around-fences)
Additional comments not posted (1)
UPGRADING.md (1)
Line range hint
149-151
: Surround fenced code blocks with blank lines.Ensure the fenced code blocks are surrounded by blank lines for better readability.
[nTools
LanguageTool
[typographical] ~43-~43: It appears that a comma is missing.
Context: ...AppOptions...) ``` ### SimApp In this section we describe the changes made in Cosmos ...(DURING_THAT_TIME_COMMA)
Markdownlint
35-35: null
Fenced code blocks should be surrounded by blank lines(MD031, blanks-around-fences)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- simapp/app.go (2 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
simapp/app.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go
: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Additional comments not posted (1)
simapp/app.go (1)
250-251
: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The code change to include gas calculations for nested messages related to
MsgSubmitProposal
is approved.However, ensure that all function calls to
baseapp.SetIncludeNestedMsgsGas
match the new usage.Verification successful
Verification successful!
All function calls to
baseapp.SetIncludeNestedMsgsGas
match the new usage pattern.
simapp/app.go
:[]sdk.Msg{&govv1.MsgSubmitProposal{}}
baseapp/abci_test.go
:[]sdk.Msg{&baseapptestutil.MsgNestedMessages{}}
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `baseapp.SetIncludeNestedMsgsGas` match the new usage. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new usage. rg --type go -A 5 $'baseapp.SetIncludeNestedMsgsGas'Length of output: 800
* main: feat(log): remove core dependency and update core interface to be dependency free (#21045) chore: fix some comments (#21085) feat: simulate nested messages (#20291) chore(network): remove `DefaultConfigWithAppConfigWithQueryGasLimit` (#21055) fix(runtime): remove `appv1alpha1.Config` from runtime (#21042) feat(simapp/v2): Add store server to testnet init cmd (#21076) chore(indexer/postgres): update to changes on main (#21077) feat(schema/appdata): async listener mux'ing (#20879) ci: Use large box for 052 branch sims on CI (#21067) chore(all): replace all `fmt.Errorf` without paramters with `errors.New` (#21068)
Are we feature frozen? Is this expected this won't be in v0.52? |
Description
Closes:
#15809
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!
in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeCHANGELOG.md
Reviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
baseapp
module of the Cosmos SDK, enhancing transaction complexity handling.Documentation