chore(x): fix some typos in comment

[pinglanlu]

Description

fix some typos in comment

---

Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

• included the correct type prefix in the PR title, you can find examples of the prefixes below:
• confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
• targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
• provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
• reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
• included the necessary unit and integration tests
• added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
• updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
• confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.

I have...

• confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
• confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
• reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes
  • Corrected typographical errors in comments for better clarity in the SendCoins method and the TestSendCoins_WithRestriction method.
  • Updated comment in the Validation method of the Permissions struct to clarify the term "super admin."

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces minor corrections in comments across three files related to the Keeper struct and its methods. Specifically, it corrects typographical errors in comments for the SendCoins method and the TestSendCoins_WithRestriction method, as well as clarifying a comment in the Validation method of the Permissions struct. No changes were made to the functionality, logic, or structure of the code in these files.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
x/bank/v2/keeper/keeper.go	Corrected the spelling of "recipient" in the comment for the SendCoins method.
x/bank/v2/keeper/keeper_test.go	Updated comment in TestSendCoins_WithRestriction from failt to failed.
x/circuit/types/permission.go	Clarified comment in Validation method from "super addmin" to "super admin".

Possibly related PRs

• fix(x/bank): Better handling of negative spendable balances #21407: This PR modifies the SendCoins functionality, which is directly related to the SendCoins method mentioned in the main PR.
• feat(bank/v2): Send function #21606: This PR introduces a new SendCoins function and enhancements to the Keeper struct, including the SendCoins method.
• refactor(x/bank): swap sendrestriction check in InputOutputCoins #21976: This PR involves a refactor of the InputOutputCoins method, related to the SendCoins method's logic.
• docs(x/bank): fix function comments #22039: This PR updates comments for functions related to send restrictions, relevant to the SendCoins method's functionality.
• feat(x/circuit): Allow msg Reset with empty msgURL #22459: This PR introduces a reset feature affecting message handling, which may indirectly relate to the SendCoins method's operational context.

Suggested labels

C:x/bank/v2

Suggested reviewers

• sontrinh16
• julienrbrt
• akhilkumarpilli
• kocubinski

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d38d026 and 8cd8d29.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)

• x/bank/v2/keeper/keeper.go (1 hunks)
• x/bank/v2/keeper/keeper_test.go (1 hunks)
• x/circuit/types/permission.go (1 hunks)

✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)

• x/bank/v2/keeper/keeper.go
• x/bank/v2/keeper/keeper_test.go
• x/circuit/types/permission.go

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[julienrbrt]

Thank you!