-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 627
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor(ica): packet data unmarshaling logic refactored #4232
Merged
srdtrk
merged 13 commits into
main
from
serdar/issue#4224-ica-refactor-unmarshalpacketdata
Aug 21, 2023
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
068f0da
refactor(ica): refactored packet data's unmarshal logic
srdtrk 8f0f35e
fix(ica_test): made tests pass
srdtrk ab9a619
Merge branch 'main' into serdar/issue#4224-ica-refactor-unmarshalpack…
srdtrk d3b2775
Merge branch 'main' into serdar/issue#4224-ica-refactor-unmarshalpack…
srdtrk 87e6549
Merge branch 'main' into serdar/issue#4224-ica-refactor-unmarshalpack…
srdtrk e58aa8d
merge: branch 'main' into serdar/issue#4224-ica-refactor-unmarshalpac…
srdtrk ae95265
imp(ica): changed to UnmarshalJSON api
srdtrk 329be08
merge: branch 'main' into serdar/issue#4224-ica-refactor-unmarshalpac…
srdtrk 01619ac
Merge branch 'main' into serdar/issue#4224-ica-refactor-unmarshalpack…
srdtrk 2847751
Merge branch 'main' into serdar/issue#4224-ica-refactor-unmarshalpack…
srdtrk 6bc3d9e
Merge branch 'main' into serdar/issue#4224-ica-refactor-unmarshalpack…
srdtrk bc5e40d
merge: branch 'main' into serdar/issue#4224-ica-refactor-unmarshalpac…
srdtrk dc40ae1
docs(ica): added godocs to iapd's 'UnmarshalJSON' method
srdtrk File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We could also make
UnmarshalJSON
a method ofInterchainAccountPacketData
.Usage:
Happy to defer to you guys on what API you prefer
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, this is also a valid approach although the function signature likely should be different. I tried this first (and called it
FromBytes
) but I thought the one I added looked better in the end. I'm happy to keep this PR open until we get some other opinionsThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Aha, yes, sorry for my typo! Indeed, you don't need to return
(InterchainAccountPacketData, error)
since you're acting on unmarshaling into the receiver. I'll edit my first comment! 😛I think
UnmarshalJSON
naming is pretty common/standard in golang and in cosmos. Here's an example inx/staking
andx/auth
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, sounds good. I'll do this
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Note: I did this