-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 617
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: add rpc VerifyMembershipProof
- querier approach for conditional clients (backport #5821)
#5850
feat: add rpc VerifyMembershipProof
- querier approach for conditional clients (backport #5821)
#5850
Conversation
…nal clients (#5821) * feat: adding protobuf msgs and rpc for VerifyMembershipProof * feat: adding VerifyMembershipProof query implementation and wiring * chore(08-wasm): add VerifyMembershipProof to stargate query acceptlist * test: adding failure case unit tests for VerifyMembershipProof query * fix: correct protodoc * chore: proto-swagger-gen * chore: protodocs * test: adding additional test cases * test: assert gas consumed in tests * chore: rename rpc to VerifyMembership and update tests * chore: update service definition URL in 08-wasm stargate accepted queries * test: adding verify membership test to 08-wasm querier * Update proto/ibc/core/client/v1/query.proto Co-authored-by: Carlos Rodriguez <carlos@interchain.io> * chore: review items - log error at debug, pass cachedCtx and adjust tests for discarded state checks * chore: add doc comment to querier test, address nit to move defaultAcceptList * chore: regen protos and swagger doc * nit: update comment in querier * imp: add more info to godoc for VerifyMembership rpc --------- Co-authored-by: Carlos Rodriguez <carlos@interchain.io> Co-authored-by: Cian Hatton <cian@interchain.io> (cherry picked from commit ed9bf74) # Conflicts: # docs/client/swagger-ui/swagger.yaml # modules/light-clients/08-wasm/types/querier.go # modules/light-clients/08-wasm/types/querier_test.go
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
do we typically bp this? I guess it makes sense considering this wouldn't be in versioned docs?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think we've ever removed it in backports. But it looks like it was possibly a bit dated on the release branch judging by LOC diffs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ah, we don't have it on 8.1!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm pending tiny fixes due to shuffling of stuff in testing package.
This is an automatic backport of pull request #5821 done by Mergify.
Cherry-pick of ed9bf74 has failed:
To fix up this pull request, you can check it out locally. See documentation: https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/reviewing-changes-in-pull-requests/checking-out-pull-requests-locally
Mergify commands and options
More conditions and actions can be found in the documentation.
You can also trigger Mergify actions by commenting on this pull request:
@Mergifyio refresh
will re-evaluate the rules@Mergifyio rebase
will rebase this PR on its base branch@Mergifyio update
will merge the base branch into this PR@Mergifyio backport <destination>
will backport this PR on<destination>
branchAdditionally, on Mergify dashboard you can:
Finally, you can contact us on https://mergify.com