Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed missing 'babel-polyfill' dependency #62

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jan 17, 2019
Merged

Fixed missing 'babel-polyfill' dependency #62

merged 1 commit into from Jan 17, 2019

Conversation

rob234
Copy link

@rob234 rob234 commented Nov 6, 2018

It seems something changed in the node.js default setup in ubuntu 18.04 and fresh installations of nanovault do not work anymore. After adding the 'babel-polyfill' dependency everything is fine again.

@dVoooo
Copy link

dVoooo commented Jan 1, 2019

Thanks @rob234
see also
LedgerHQ/ledgerjs#211
LedgerHQ/ledgerjs#228

@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
"@angular/router": "^5.0.0",
"@ledgerhq/hw-transport-u2f": "^4.7.3",
"@types/crypto-js": "^3.1.38",
"babel-polyfill": "^6.26.0",
Copy link

@webmaster128 webmaster128 Jan 3, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This dependency of the monorepo root package.json will not be a dependency of the published npm packages. In fact, this section behaves like devDependencies (see LedgerHQ/ledgerjs#247)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry about the comment above, I was in the wrong repository

@cronoh
Copy link
Owner

cronoh commented Jan 17, 2019

Thanks for finding this @rob234 - sorry for the delay but I am merging it in now.

@cronoh cronoh merged commit 70a3f89 into cronoh:master Jan 17, 2019
@p-buglewicz p-buglewicz deleted the babel-polyfill-FIX branch September 4, 2019 14:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants