fix: proxy authorization type Basic

[Buluc-Celik-Ozbul]

• Closes Proxy-Authorization header created with basic with a small "b" #22383

User facing changelog

The Proxy-Authorization header when present with basic authorization will read "Basic" with a capital "B".

Additional details

When I set up a proxy with username and password, the Proxy-Authorization header is created with basic type but it says "basic" with a small "b" and this fails with some proxies. The Proxy-Authorization header should have been created with "Basic" keyword with a capital "B"

Steps to test

[na]

How has the user experience changed?

[na]

PR Tasks

[na]

• Have tests been added/updated?
• [na] Has the original issue (or this PR, if no issue exists) been tagged with a release in ZenHub? (user-facing changes only)
• [na] Has a PR for user-facing changes been opened in cypress-documentation?
• [na] Have API changes been updated in the type definitions?

[cypress-bot]

Thanks for taking the time to open a PR!

• Create a Draft Pull Request if your PR is not ready for review. Mark the PR as Ready for Review when you're ready for a Cypress team member to review the PR.
• Become familiar with the Code Review Checklist for guidelines on coding standards and what needs to be done before a PR can be merged.

[CLAassistant]

All committers have signed the CLA.

[emilyrohrbough]

@Buluc-Celik Thank you for the contribution! Can you please sign the CLA Agreement so we can move forward with this change?

[Buluc-Celik-Ozbul]

hi @emilyrohrbough I have signed it, I think it needs a bit of time to reflect though

[emilyrohrbough]

@Buluc-Celik are you toggling between two git accounts?

[Buluc-Celik]

Sorry about that, signed with both now

[emilyrohrbough]

@Buluc-Celik no worries 😄

[lmiller1990]

Looks good. We've got some flake blocking merging, but I can take it from here - it's not related to your change. Thanks!

[Buluc-Celik]

Thank you!

[Buluc-Celik]

Hi, do you mind re-running the failed flaky test a few times to get this through, please? I would really like to get this in the next version and start using it.

[lmiller1990]

Sure, I think the flake is fixed now. I will re-run.

[cypress]

---

Test summary

37681 • 0 • 456 • 0 • 11

---

Run details

Project	cypress
Status	Passed
Commit	73c91e5
Started	Jun 29, 2022 5:35 AM
Ended	Jun 29, 2022 5:54 AM
Duration	18:51 💡
OS	Linux Debian - 10.11
Browser	Multiple

View run in Cypress Dashboard ➡️

---

Flakiness

	actions/click.cy.js		2
1	... > scroll-behavior > can scroll to and click elements in html with scroll-behavior: smooth
2	... > scroll-behavior > can scroll to and click elements in html with scroll-behavior: smooth
	xhr.cy.js		3
1	... > logs request + response headers
2	... > logs Method, Status, URL, and XHR
3	... > logs response
This comment includes only the first 5 flaky tests. See all 11 flaky tests in the Cypress Dashboard.

---

This comment has been generated by cypress-bot as a result of this project's GitHub integration settings. You can manage this integration in this project's settings in the Cypress Dashboard

[lmiller1990]

Less flake but still something isn't passing - figuring it out, thanks for waiting.

[lmiller1990]

@Buluc-Celik-Ozbul] please wait a moment - I am going to get this merged. If you keep back merging, it re runs everything. I can run "only from failed" which is more likely to succeed. I can take it from here.

[Buluc-Celik-Ozbul]

Sure, thank you

[lmiller1990]

Thanks for your patience @Buluc-Celik-Ozbul - this will be in the next release. Those are usually every two weeks at maximum.

[Buluc-Celik-Ozbul]

Thanks again!