-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Lancet padding analyses #11
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is quite useful - for the summary figs and the by-categroy figs, please repeat comparing consensus calls with each window size. I think that will help ascertain if and how many potentially important calls are missed.
I added consensus files and also the final plot was updated using consensus VCF files |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice work with the analysis. I feel pretty good about reducing window to 400 bp and padding to 200bp
Analyses folder has a
lancet_padding_window
folder that shows how runtimes and variant results vary when using different lancet parameters (window and padding)