Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

View config as protos, via a new class #1760

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Jun 28, 2024
Merged

View config as protos, via a new class #1760

merged 12 commits into from
Jun 28, 2024

Conversation

Ekrekr
Copy link
Contributor

@Ekrekr Ekrekr commented Jun 25, 2024

No description provided.

@Ekrekr Ekrekr changed the title Add view config action, remove JS interfaces for it Add view config action, remove JS interfaces for SQLX config options Jun 25, 2024
@Ekrekr Ekrekr mentioned this pull request Jun 25, 2024
@Ekrekr Ekrekr changed the title Add view config action, remove JS interfaces for SQLX config options View config as protos, via a new class Jun 27, 2024
@Ekrekr Ekrekr requested a review from diasdauletov June 28, 2024 10:35

public where(where: Contextable<ITableContext, string>) {
this.table.where(where);
return "";
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why these methods return empty strings?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it's for when you call the JS API when in a SQLX file. E.g. so that publish(...).where(...) doesn't actually alter the underlying SQL.

@Ekrekr Ekrekr requested a review from diasdauletov June 28, 2024 12:44
@Ekrekr Ekrekr merged commit b3638a8 into main Jun 28, 2024
4 checks passed
@Ekrekr Ekrekr deleted the add-view-config-action branch June 28, 2024 14:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants