Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix inverted --print/--no-print flag #7524

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 8, 2023
Merged

Conversation

dbeatty10
Copy link
Contributor

@dbeatty10 dbeatty10 commented May 5, 2023

resolves #7517

Description

This flag must not have the relevant tests, or this wouldn't have been able to slip through during this re-factor. And I didn't add any relevant tests.

Maybe the reviewer would be so kind as to add them? 🙏 Will offer co-authorship as a reward 😎

Checklist

  • I have read the contributing guide and understand what's expected of me
  • I have signed the CLA
  • I have run this code in development and it appears to resolve the stated issue
  • 👈 This PR includes tests
  • Docs changes are not required/relevant for this PR
  • I have run changie new to create a changelog entry

@dbeatty10 dbeatty10 requested review from a team as code owners May 5, 2023 19:30
@dbeatty10 dbeatty10 requested review from emmyoop and aranke and removed request for a team May 5, 2023 19:30
@cla-bot cla-bot bot added the cla:yes label May 5, 2023
@dbeatty10 dbeatty10 added the ready_for_review Externally contributed PR has functional approval, ready for code review from Core engineering label May 5, 2023
Copy link
Member

@aranke aranke left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@dbeatty10
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing and re-opening to try to re-trigger this CI check:

image

@dbeatty10 dbeatty10 closed this May 6, 2023
@dbeatty10 dbeatty10 reopened this May 6, 2023
@jtcohen6
Copy link
Contributor

jtcohen6 commented May 7, 2023

I do not know why the snyk check seems to be hanging on all PRs :( If we can't figure it out early this week, I can disable it as a required check.

@dbeatty10 dbeatty10 merged commit 19d6dab into main May 8, 2023
@dbeatty10 dbeatty10 deleted the dbeatty/invert-print-check branch May 8, 2023 13:20
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 8, 2023
jtcohen6 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 8, 2023
(cherry picked from commit 19d6dab)

Co-authored-by: Doug Beatty <44704949+dbeatty10@users.noreply.github.com>
@yu-iskw
Copy link
Contributor

yu-iskw commented May 9, 2023

@dbeatty10 Thank you for quickly fixing it. Can you tell me when dbt-core 1.5.1 gets available? I would like to know the fixed version right now.

@jtcohen6
Copy link
Contributor

jtcohen6 commented May 9, 2023

We'll be putting out a release candidate of 1.5.1 this week, including all fixes that have been merged far

@aranke aranke mentioned this pull request May 9, 2023
6 tasks
@yu-iskw
Copy link
Contributor

yu-iskw commented May 10, 2023

@jtcohen6 Thank you for sharing the information. I look forward to it!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport 1.5.latest cla:yes ready_for_review Externally contributed PR has functional approval, ready for code review from Core engineering
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[CT-2535] [Regression] Print flag inverted in dbt v1.5.0
4 participants