Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Blockfrost crates #313

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Blockfrost crates #313

wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

rooooooooob
Copy link
Contributor

Rust and WASM crates for creating tx builders from blockfrost.

The rust crate can be directly used with the blockfrost crate when the feature direct_api is enabled. If it is not then various parsing ability is still exposed for cost models.

The WASM crate due to technical restrictions just exposes an endpoint that takes in the response JSON and creates the config.

the cml/wasm crate exports this new cml-blockfrost-wasm functionality which only increased compiled size from 896kb -> 911kb so should be fine to include by default.

TODO: some documentation but this would conflict with #307's documentation update so can be done at a later date.

rooooooooob and others added 7 commits March 1, 2024 07:15
Rust and WASM crates for creating tx builders from blockfrost.

The rust crate can be directly used with the `blockfrost` crate when the
feature `direct_api` is enabled. If it is not then various parsing
ability is still exposed for cost models.

The WASM crate due to technical restrictions just exposes an endpoint
that takes in the response JSON and creates the config.

the cml/wasm crate exports this new `cml-blockfrost-wasm` functionality
which only increased compiled size from 896kb -> 911kb so should be fine
to include by default.

TODO: some documentation but this would conflict with #307's
documentation update so can be done at a later date.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant