Portuguese language updates

[ddsjoberg]

What changes are proposed in this pull request?

• Updates and additions to Portuguese language translations. (Bug Report: update pt translations #1098)

If there is an GitHub issue associated with this pull request, please provide link.

closes #1098

---

Checklist for PR reviewer

• PR branch has pulled the most recent updates from master branch. Ensure the pull request branch and your local version match and both have the latest updates from the master branch.
• If an update was made to tbl_summary(), was the same change implemented for tbl_svysummary()?
• If a new function was added, function included in _pkgdown.yml
• If a bug was fixed, a unit test was added for the bug check
• Run pkgdown::build_site(). Check the R console for errors, and review the rendered website.
• Code coverage is suitable for any new functions/features. Review coverage with covr::report(). Before you run, set Sys.setenv(NOT_CRAN="true") and begin in a fresh R session without any packages loaded.
• R CMD Check runs without errors, warnings, and notes
• usethis::use_spell_check() runs with no spelling errors in documentation

When the branch is ready to be merged into master:

• Update NEWS.md with the changes from this pull request under the heading "# gtsummary (development version)". If there is an issue associated with the pull request, reference it in parantheses at the end update (see NEWS.md for examples).
• Increment the version number using usethis::use_version(which = "dev")
• Run codemetar::write_codemeta()
• Run usethis::use_spell_check() again
• Approve Pull Request
• Merge the PR. Please use "Squash and merge".

[ddsjoberg]

Thank you @philsf for the improvements to the translations!! 👐🏼 👐🏼 👐🏼 👐🏼

Can you please take a look to check I didn't make an error in the copy and pasting of the translations?

[ddsjoberg]

Thank you @philsf for the quick updates!!

[philsf]

@ddsjoberg sorry, but I was testing with the paired dataset, and assumed the paired_wide would work the same. I just noticed the translation DOES NOT kick in when using mcnemar.test.wide for some reason. Is it being collected from a different source, other than the XLSX/CSV I provided?

[ddsjoberg]

@ddsjoberg sorry, but I was testing with the paired dataset, and assumed the paired_wide would work the same. I just noticed the translation DOES NOT kick in when using mcnemar.test.wide for some reason. Is it being collected from a different source, other than the XLSX/CSV I provided?

Thank you VERY MUCH for the checking. I looked into the issue and ALL translated p-value footnotes were being reset back to English. Should be updated now. Can you confirm on your end? @philsf

[philsf]

This is amazing, thank you very much for this @ddsjoberg.

It now does what is says on the tin. I believe all tests are correctly translated to pt, in all functions I tested. Can'th thank you enough.

The sad part is: the translations made so far work, but the package is not yet fully translated bc I used the previously translated strings as a base, and added a few I usually come by in day2day - but to make a proper list of translation I would need to figure out all tests/methods/models available and include the strings in the template. I will be delighted to help add more strings in the future, but I don't think you should wait to merge what was done so far.

perfect is the enemy of good (or something like that)

[ddsjoberg]

@philsf please feel free to add whenever you have time!