Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: support generating JSON schema for integration with VSCode #3849

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 4, 2024

Conversation

njzjz
Copy link
Member

@njzjz njzjz commented Jun 3, 2024

Doc:
image

Validation of type:
image

Validation of required keys:
image

Auto-completion:

image

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added support for generating JSON schema documentation.
    • Updated --out-type argument choices to include "json_schema".
  • Documentation

    • Added instructions for using Visual Studio Code to handle JSON files and generate JSON schema.
  • Tests

    • Introduced unit tests for the doc_train_input function to ensure proper handling of different output types.
  • Chores

    • Updated the version constraint for the dargs dependency to >= 0.4.6.

Signed-off-by: Jinzhe Zeng <jinzhe.zeng@rutgers.edu>
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 3, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@njzjz has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 8 minutes and 46 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 22a98fa and b376370.

Walkthrough

The recent updates enhance the deepmd package by introducing the ability to generate JSON schema documentation. This is facilitated through the new gen_json_schema function and the updated doc_train_input function, which now supports "json_schema" as an output type. Additionally, the main_parser function in deepmd/main.py has been updated to recognize this new output type. The documentation and dependencies have also been adjusted accordingly, with new tests ensuring the functionality works as expected.

Changes

Files/Paths Change Summary
deepmd/entrypoints/doc.py Added gen_json_schema import and updated doc_train_input to handle "json_schema" output type.
deepmd/main.py Updated --out-type argument choices in main_parser to include "json_schema".
deepmd/utils/argcheck.py Added gen_json_schema function and updated normalize() function.
doc/train/train-input.rst Added instructions for using JSON schema with VS Code.
pyproject.toml Updated dargs dependency version constraint to >= 0.4.6.
source/tests/common/test_doc_train_input.py Added unit tests for doc_train_input function covering different output types.

Sequence Diagram(s) (Beta)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant CLI as deepmd CLI
    participant DocModule as deepmd.entrypoints.doc
    participant Utils as deepmd.utils.argcheck

    User->>CLI: Run command with --out-type json_schema
    CLI->>DocModule: Call doc_train_input with out_type=json_schema
    DocModule->>Utils: Call gen_json_schema
    Utils-->>DocModule: Return JSON schema
    DocModule-->>CLI: Output JSON schema
    CLI-->>User: Display JSON schema
Loading

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 3, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 82.67%. Comparing base (f23c77e) to head (b376370).
Report is 118 commits behind head on devel.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##            devel    #3849      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   82.63%   82.67%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         515      515              
  Lines       49533    49540       +7     
  Branches     2985     2986       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits        40932    40955      +23     
+ Misses       7690     7674      -16     
  Partials      911      911              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
deepmd/entrypoints/doc.py (1)

19-20: The addition of handling for out_type == "json_schema" is correctly implemented. Consider adding a comment explaining what gen_json_schema() does for future maintainability.

doc/train/train-input.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: Jinzhe Zeng <jinzhe.zeng@rutgers.edu>
@njzjz njzjz requested a review from wanghan-iapcm June 3, 2024 07:52
@wanghan-iapcm wanghan-iapcm added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 4, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Jun 4, 2024
@njzjz njzjz added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 4, 2024
Merged via the queue into deepmodeling:devel with commit eb474d4 Jun 4, 2024
60 checks passed
@njzjz njzjz deleted the json-schema branch June 4, 2024 17:34
mtaillefumier pushed a commit to mtaillefumier/deepmd-kit that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2024
…pmodeling#3849)

Doc:

![image](https://github.com/deepmodeling/deepmd-kit/assets/9496702/b313616d-4f98-4978-931b-b135208f42ac)

Validation of type:

![image](https://github.com/deepmodeling/deepmd-kit/assets/9496702/c54b912d-9440-4dd2-94be-5c5392f492c8)

Validation of required keys:

![image](https://github.com/deepmodeling/deepmd-kit/assets/9496702/bf6c6469-d6a1-4d89-9015-b845ddddc921)

Auto-completion:


![image](https://github.com/deepmodeling/deepmd-kit/assets/9496702/c1aea3ef-0c93-4a50-85e4-7070c40460dd)



<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **New Features**
  - Added support for generating JSON schema documentation.
  - Updated `--out-type` argument choices to include "json_schema".

- **Documentation**
- Added instructions for using Visual Studio Code to handle JSON files
and generate JSON schema.

- **Tests**
- Introduced unit tests for the `doc_train_input` function to ensure
proper handling of different output types.

- **Chores**
- Updated the version constraint for the `dargs` dependency to `>=
0.4.6`.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->

---------

Signed-off-by: Jinzhe Zeng <jinzhe.zeng@rutgers.edu>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants