Armorblox Cortex Integration #16181
Merged
Armorblox Cortex Integration #16181
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
* Armorblox Cortex Integration Initial Commit for Cortex Integration Added README Deleted www from Armorblox url Addition of a new command to check remediation actions Added playbook and changes Removal of extra space in Armorblox Outbound Threat and renaming MailBox to Mailbox in Armorblox Abuse MailBox Threat Removed default tenant name Added changes for testing script Removed MailBox incident type Removed unwanted Threat(MailBox and Armorblox Outbound) from mapper added github users in pack metadata Co-authored-by: Rajat Upadhyaya <45485+urajat@users.noreply.github.com> * Validation-Fix - whitelisted secrets and set unsearchable key to true for all incidentfields (#4) Co-authored-by: Ankita Sharma <ankita.sharma@xoriant.com> * added test-cases to increase coverage % to 77 * Review Changes * Removed unintentional '}' * Update Packs/Armorblox/Integrations/Armorblox/Armorblox.yml Co-authored-by: dorschw <81086590+dorschw@users.noreply.github.com> * Removed custom script to send email.Added mail sender (new) integration in playbook * Playbook review Changes * Changed the pack category Co-authored-by: Ankita Sharma <ankita.sharma@xoriant.com> Co-authored-by: dorschw <81086590+dorschw@users.noreply.github.com>
content-bot
added
docs-approved
Contribution
dorschw
approved these changes
Dec 7, 2021
abaumgarten
suggested changes
Dec 7, 2021
abaumgarten
approved these changes
Dec 7, 2021
|
Hello, |
|
Hi @ankita-sharma2019, thanks I'll keep an eye on it and make sure it goes live as soon as possible, and update you once it happens. |
|
Hello @dorschw , Thanks for the quick response. Please let us know once the pack goes live. Thanks a lot! |
|
congratulations, It's live on the marketplace :)
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Original External PR
external pull request
Contributor
@urajat
Initial Commit for Cortex Integration
Added README
Deleted www from Armorblox url
Addition of a new command to check remediation actions
Added playbook and changes
Removal of extra space in Armorblox Outbound Threat and renaming MailBox to Mailbox in Armorblox Abuse MailBox Threat
Removed default tenant name
Added changes for testing script
Removed MailBox incident type
Removed unwanted Threat(MailBox and Armorblox Outbound) from mapper
added github users in pack metadata
Co-authored-by: Rajat Upadhyaya 45485+urajat@users.noreply.github.com
Contributing to Cortex XSOAR Content
Make sure to register your contribution by filling the contribution registration form
The Pull Request will be reviewed only after the contribution registration form is filled.
Status
Related Issues
fixes: link to the issue
Description
A few sentences describing the overall goals of the pull request's commits.
Screenshots
Paste here any images that will help the reviewer
Minimum version of Cortex XSOAR
Does it break backward compatibility?
Must have