Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Run sorbet against main #10642

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 20, 2024
Merged

Run sorbet against main #10642

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 20, 2024

Conversation

JamieMagee
Copy link
Contributor

What are you trying to accomplish?

Run the Sorbet workflow against main as it only generates the report against main. This was removed in #10352.

cc: @jakecoffman

Anything you want to highlight for special attention from reviewers?

How will you know you've accomplished your goal?

Checklist

  • I have run the complete test suite to ensure all tests and linters pass.
  • I have thoroughly tested my code changes to ensure they work as expected, including adding additional tests for new functionality.
  • I have written clear and descriptive commit messages.
  • I have provided a detailed description of the changes in the pull request, including the problem it addresses, how it fixes the problem, and any relevant details about the implementation.
  • I have ensured that the code is well-documented and easy to understand.

@JamieMagee JamieMagee added the sorbet 🍦 Relates to Sorbet types label Sep 20, 2024
@JamieMagee JamieMagee requested a review from a team as a code owner September 20, 2024 03:46
@jakecoffman jakecoffman enabled auto-merge (squash) September 20, 2024 14:02
@jakecoffman jakecoffman merged commit 41e893c into main Sep 20, 2024
53 checks passed
@jakecoffman jakecoffman deleted the jamiemagee/sorbet-main branch September 20, 2024 14:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
sorbet 🍦 Relates to Sorbet types
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants