ci: ensure the check-for-changes checks previous deployed version #1346
Conversation
📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant updates to multiple CI/CD workflow files within the GitHub Actions framework. Key changes include the addition of a new job, Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 10
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
.github/workflows/dispatch-apps.yml (1)
31-33: Document the workflow's inputs and outputsThe new
get-currently-released-versionjob's purpose is clear from its name, but its outputs and how they're used in the workflow should be documented.Add a comment block above the job to document:
- What version information it retrieves
- What outputs it produces
- How these outputs are used in the workflow
+ # Retrieves the currently deployed version for the target environment + # Outputs: + # - current_version: The version currently deployed in the target environment + # Used by: + # - check-for-changes: To verify if deployment is needed get-currently-released-version: name: Get currently released version uses: ./.github/workflows/workflow-get-currently-released-version.yml🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
33-33: could not read reusable workflow file for "./.github/workflows/workflow-get-currently-released-version.yml": open /cache/16/5149c710-f89f-4a8a-bbc4-e7120d25035d/home/jailuser/git/.github/workflows/workflow-get-currently-released-version.yml: no such file or directory
(workflow-call)
.github/workflows/workflow-check-for-changes.yml (1)
Line range hint
1-74: Well-architected separation of infrastructure and application change detection.The workflow's new architecture effectively separates infrastructure and application change detection by:
- Using distinct base SHAs for version comparison
- Maintaining separate filtering steps
- Properly organizing outputs based on change type
This separation allows for more precise control over what gets deployed and when, reducing the risk of unnecessary deployments.
Consider documenting this architecture decision in an ADR (Architecture Decision Record) to explain the rationale behind separating infrastructure and application change detection.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 78-78: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
.github/workflows/ci-cd-yt01.yml (1)
21-25: LGTM! Robust version comparison implementation.The changes ensure that the workflow compares against the last deployed version rather than an arbitrary base, which is a more reliable approach for detecting relevant changes.
Consider documenting this version comparison strategy in the repository's documentation to help other developers understand the CI/CD workflow's behavior.
.github/workflows/ci-cd-staging.yml (1)
21-21: Well-implemented version comparison logic.The changes effectively implement the requirement to check against previously deployed versions by using the SHA outputs from the version retrieval job.
Consider documenting the version comparison strategy in the repository's documentation to help maintainers understand:
- How versions are tracked across environments
- When and why version comparisons are performed
- What triggers infrastructure vs. application deployments
Also applies to: 23-25
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
- .github/workflows/ci-cd-prod.yml (3 hunks)
- .github/workflows/ci-cd-staging.yml (3 hunks)
- .github/workflows/ci-cd-yt01.yml (3 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dispatch-apps.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/workflow-check-for-changes.yml (2 hunks)
- .github/workflows/workflow-get-latest-deployed-versions-from-github.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint
.github/workflows/dispatch-apps.yml
33-33: could not read reusable workflow file for "./.github/workflows/workflow-get-currently-released-version.yml": open /cache/16/5149c710-f89f-4a8a-bbc4-e7120d25035d/home/jailuser/git/.github/workflows/workflow-get-currently-released-version.yml: no such file or directory
(workflow-call)
.github/workflows/workflow-get-latest-deployed-versions-from-github.yml
33-33: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:146: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
38-38: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:20: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
44-44: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:145: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
49-49: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:20: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
🔇 Additional comments (14)
.github/workflows/workflow-get-latest-deployed-versions-from-github.yml (2)
18-25: LGTM!The job configuration and output mapping are well-structured.
10-16: Verify workflow output usageLet's verify that the workflow outputs are properly consumed by the calling workflows.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the results, I can now generate the final response as we have clear evidence of how the workflow outputs are being used.
Workflow outputs are properly consumed across CI/CD workflows
The verification confirms that the workflow outputs
infra_version_shaandapps_version_shaare:
- Called by three CI/CD workflows:
ci-cd-yt01.yml,ci-cd-staging.yml, andci-cd-prod.yml- Correctly referenced in all workflows using the proper syntax:
needs.get-versions-from-github.outputs.<output_name>- Used consistently across all environments (yt01, staging, prod)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if the workflow outputs are properly used in other workflows # Test: Search for workflow calls and output usage echo "Checking workflow calls and output usage..." rg -A 5 "uses: \./.github/workflows/workflow-get-latest-deployed-versions-from-github\.yml" .github/workflows/ rg "needs.*get-versions-from-github.*outputs\.(infra|apps)_version_sha" .github/workflows/Length of output: 2141
.github/workflows/workflow-check-for-changes.yml (2)
5-13: LGTM! Well-structured input parameters.The addition of separate base SHAs for infrastructure and application changes provides good separation of concerns and enables precise change detection against previously deployed versions.
39-44: Verify the output mappings are correctly configured.The outputs are now split between
filterandfilter-backendsteps. Let's verify the mapping is correct:
- Infrastructure changes (
hasAzureChanges) →filter- Application changes (backend, tests, schema, migration) →
filter-backend✅ Verification successful
Let me generate new shell scripts to better verify the output mappings.
This will help us see:
- The complete workflow file to understand the context
- The path patterns defined for each filter to verify if they align with the output mappings
- Whether the outputs are correctly mapped to their respective filter steps based on the nature of the changes they track
Now I have enough information to verify the output mappings. Let me generate the final response.
Output mappings are correctly configured
The output mappings in the workflow file are properly aligned with their respective filter steps:
Infrastructure changes (using
filterstep):
hasAzureChanges→ correctly maps tosteps.filter.outputs.azure_any_modifiedhasSlackNotifierChanges→ correctly maps tosteps.filter.outputs.slackNotifier_any_modifiedApplication changes (using
filter-backendstep):
hasBackendChanges→ correctly maps tosteps.filter-backend.outputs.backend_any_modifiedhasTestChanges→ correctly maps tosteps.filter-backend.outputs.tests_any_modifiedhasSchemaChanges→ correctly maps tosteps.filter-backend.outputs.schema_any_modifiedhasMigrationChanges→ correctly maps tosteps.filter-backend.outputs.migration_any_modified🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the output mappings align with the file patterns in both filter steps # Test 1: Check if any backend-related outputs reference the 'filter' step instead of 'filter-backend' echo "Checking for incorrect backend output mappings..." rg -A 1 'hasBackendChanges|hasTestChanges|hasSchemaChanges|hasMigrationChanges' | rg 'steps.filter.outputs' # Test 2: Check if infrastructure-related outputs reference 'filter-backend' instead of 'filter' echo "Checking for incorrect infrastructure output mappings..." rg -A 1 'hasAzureChanges|hasSlackNotifierChanges' | rg 'steps.filter-backend.outputs'Length of output: 425
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's directly examine the workflow file content to verify the mappings # Check the content of the workflow file echo "=== Workflow file content ===" cat .github/workflows/workflow-check-for-changes.yml # Also check for any path filters defined echo -e "\n=== Path filters defined ===" rg "paths:" .github/workflows/workflow-check-for-changes.yml -A 10Length of output: 3176
.github/workflows/ci-cd-yt01.yml (3)
94-103:⚠️ Potential issueApply the same permissions and error handling improvements.
This job has the same requirements as the
store-infra-versionjob above.Please apply the same permissions and error handling improvements as suggested for the
store-infra-versionjob.
13-18: LGTM! Verify the reusable workflow exists.The version retrieval setup is well-structured and follows GitHub Actions best practices by using a reusable workflow.
Let's verify the referenced workflow file exists:
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to verify the existence of the reusable workflow file.
This script uses
fdto search for the file and display its contents if found, which will give us more confidence about the workflow's existence and implementation.
✓ Reusable workflow exists and is properly implemented
The reusable workflow
.github/workflows/workflow-get-latest-deployed-versions-from-github.ymlexists and is well-structured with:
- Proper workflow_call trigger configuration
- Required environment input parameter
- Clear output definitions for both infra and apps versions
- Comprehensive implementation to fetch and process version information
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the reusable workflow file exists if [ -f ".github/workflows/workflow-get-latest-deployed-versions-from-github.yml" ]; then echo "✓ Reusable workflow file exists" else echo "✗ Missing reusable workflow file" fiLength of output: 248
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the workflow file using fd fd "workflow-get-latest-deployed-versions-from-github.yml" .github/workflows/ # If found, show its content if fd "workflow-get-latest-deployed-versions-from-github.yml" .github/workflows/ -x cat {}; then echo "File found and displayed above" else echo "File not found" fiLength of output: 2257
Line range hint
13-103: Verify GitHub variable access across environments.The workflow's version management implementation is solid, but we should verify that the GitHub variables are accessible in all required environments.
Let's check the variable accessibility:
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to verify the GitHub variables usage and workflow structure.
Based on the comprehensive workflow analysis, I can now provide a final verification response:
GitHub variable management is properly implemented with necessary safeguards
The workflow implementation is robust with:
- Proper version management through
get-current-versionandget-latest-deployed-versions-from-githubworkflows- Clear output definitions in the dependent workflows
- Correct variable persistence through
store-infra-versionandstore-apps-versionjobs- Appropriate conditional execution based on version and change detection
The initial concern about GitHub variable accessibility is addressed by the workflow design:
- Variables are written only after successful deployments
- The
store-infra-versionandstore-apps-versionjobs have proper conditional checks (if: ${{ needs.deploy-*.result == 'success' }})- Version retrieval is handled by a dedicated reusable workflow with proper error handling
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify GitHub variable accessibility # Note: This will only show if the variables exist, not their values echo "Checking GitHub variables for YT01 environment..." gh variable list --repo ${{ github.repository }} | grep -E "INFRA_VERSION_YT01|APPS_VERSION_YT01"Length of output: 248
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check all workflow files that are referenced in ci-cd-yt01.yml echo "Checking referenced workflow files..." fd "workflow-.*\.yml" .github/workflows/ # Let's also verify the structure and dependencies of these workflows echo -e "\nChecking workflow content for variable usage..." for file in $(fd "workflow-.*\.yml" .github/workflows/); do echo -e "\n=== $file ===" grep -A 2 "outputs\|variables\|env:" "$file" || true doneLength of output: 11700
.github/workflows/ci-cd-staging.yml (4)
59-69: LGTM! Publish job correctly positioned and configured.The job maintains proper dependencies while being repositioned in the workflow sequence.
94-103:⚠️ Potential issueAdd required permissions for GitHub CLI operation.
Similar to the infrastructure version storage job, this job needs GitHub variable write permissions.
Apply the same permission fix as suggested for the
store-infra-versionjob.
Line range hint
13-103: Verify the complete job dependency chain.The workflow changes implement comprehensive version tracking, but let's verify all job dependencies are correctly ordered.
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify job dependencies in the workflow file # Extract and analyze job dependencies to ensure correct ordering # Look for any circular dependencies or missing jobs in needs arrays rg "needs: \[.*\]" .github/workflows/ci-cd-staging.yml -A 1 # Verify all referenced jobs exist rg "^[[:space:]]+\w+:" .github/workflows/ci-cd-staging.yml
13-18: LGTM! Well-structured version retrieval implementation.Good use of reusable workflow pattern. The job is correctly positioned as an initial step and properly parameterized for environment-specific usage.
Let's verify the referenced workflow exists:
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate another script to verify the existence and content of the reusable workflow:
This will help us verify both the existence and implementation of the reusable workflow that's being referenced. The previous output only showed us the dependencies and structure of the staging workflow, but we need to confirm the actual reusable workflow exists and is properly implemented.
Reusable workflow implementation verified and properly structured
The referenced workflow
./.github/workflows/workflow-get-latest-deployed-versions-from-github.ymlexists and is correctly implemented with:
- Proper input parameters for environment specification
- Well-defined outputs for both infra and apps version SHAs
- Correct GitHub API usage to fetch version variables
- Appropriate git commands to resolve version tags to SHAs
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the reusable workflow file exists and contains version retrieval logic fd -e yml -e yaml "workflow-get-latest-deployed-versions-from-github" .github/workflows/Length of output: 7382
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the reusable workflow exists and examine its content fd -e yml -e yaml "workflow-get-latest-deployed-versions-from-github" .github/workflows/ -x cat {}Length of output: 2047
.github/workflows/ci-cd-prod.yml (3)
Line range hint
13-135: LGTM! Job dependencies are well-structured.The changes to job dependencies create a clear and logical flow:
- Get versions from GitHub
- Check for changes using retrieved versions
- Deploy and store new versions
The conditional logic ensures that jobs run only when necessary, and the workflow maintains backward compatibility.
126-135:⚠️ Potential issueApply the same permissions and error handling improvements.
This job needs the same improvements as the
store-infra-versionjob regarding permissions and error handling.Please apply the same changes as suggested for the
store-infra-versionjob.
13-18: LGTM! Version retrieval implementation looks solid.The new version retrieval job and its integration with the
check-for-changesjob is well-structured. The environment parameter is correctly passed, and the output variables are properly referenced.Let's verify the reusable workflow exists and has the expected interface:
Also applies to: 21-25
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate another script to verify the existence and interface of the reusable workflow file itself:
This will help us verify:
- The reusable workflow file exists
- It accepts the
environmentinput parameter- It provides the expected outputs (
infra_version_shaandapps_version_sha)
✅ Reusable workflow implementation is correct and properly integrated
The verification confirms that:
- The reusable workflow file exists and is properly implemented
- It correctly accepts the required
environmentinput parameter- It provides the expected outputs (
infra_version_shaandapps_version_sha)- The workflow is consistently used across all environments (prod, staging, yt01)
- The job dependencies and output references in the calling workflows are correctly configured
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the reusable workflow file exists and contains the expected inputs/outputs rg -A 10 "workflow-get-latest-deployed-versions-from-github.yml" .github/workflows/Length of output: 2555
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the reusable workflow file exists and examine its content cat .github/workflows/workflow-get-latest-deployed-versions-from-github.ymlLength of output: 2024
.github/workflows/workflow-get-latest-deployed-versions-from-github.yml
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
.github/workflows/workflow-get-latest-deployed-versions-from-github.yml
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
.github/workflows/workflow-get-latest-deployed-versions-from-github.yml
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
.github/workflows/workflow-get-latest-deployed-versions-from-github.yml
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/workflow-get-latest-deployed-versions-from-github.yml (1)
7-7: Improve environment parameter descriptionThe description should explicitly list the allowed values to make it clearer for users.
- description: "Environment to get latest deployed versions for (e.g., staging, prod, yt01)" + description: "Target environment (allowed values: staging, prod, yt01)".github/workflows/ci-cd-prod.yml (1)
Line range hint
13-135: Well-structured version management workflow.The overall architecture of the version management system is well-designed with:
- Clear separation between infrastructure and application versions
- Proper job dependencies ensuring correct execution order
- Conditional execution based on detected changes
- Environment-specific version management
The implementation provides a robust foundation for tracking deployment versions.
Consider adding a cleanup job to maintain the version history, preventing the accumulation of old versions in GitHub variables.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- .github/workflows/ci-cd-prod.yml (3 hunks)
- .github/workflows/ci-cd-staging.yml (3 hunks)
- .github/workflows/ci-cd-yt01.yml (3 hunks)
- .github/workflows/workflow-check-for-changes.yml (2 hunks)
- .github/workflows/workflow-get-latest-deployed-versions-from-github.yml (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/workflow-check-for-changes.yml
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint
.github/workflows/workflow-get-latest-deployed-versions-from-github.yml
33-33: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:168: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
38-38: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:20: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
44-44: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:167: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
49-49: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:20: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
🔇 Additional comments (11)
.github/workflows/workflow-get-latest-deployed-versions-from-github.yml (1)
19-24: LGTM! Job configuration follows best practicesThe job outputs are properly defined and mapped to their respective step outputs.
.github/workflows/ci-cd-yt01.yml (4)
20-25: LGTM! Proper integration with version management.The changes correctly implement the PR objective by ensuring that check-for-changes compares against the previously deployed versions.
60-69:⚠️ Potential issueAdd missing permissions and error handling.
The job configuration needs the following improvements:
- Add required permissions for GitHub CLI operations
- Add error handling for the gh CLI command
Apply this diff to address the issues:
store-infra-version: name: Store Latest Deployed Infra Version as GitHub Variable runs-on: ubuntu-latest + permissions: + repository-variables: write needs: [deploy-infra, get-current-version] if: ${{ needs.deploy-infra.result == 'success' }} steps: - name: Set GitHub variable for latest deployed infra version run: | - gh variable set LATEST_DEPLOYED_INFRA_VERSION "${{ needs.get-current-version.outputs.version }}" --repo ${{ github.repository }} --env yt01 + if ! gh variable set LATEST_DEPLOYED_INFRA_VERSION "${{ needs.get-current-version.outputs.version }}" --repo ${{ github.repository }} --env yt01; then + echo "Failed to set GitHub variable for infra version" + exit 1 + fi
94-103:⚠️ Potential issueAdd missing permissions and error handling.
This job has the same issues as the store-infra-version job.
Apply this diff to address the issues:
store-apps-version: name: Store Latest Deployed Apps Version as GitHub Variable runs-on: ubuntu-latest + permissions: + repository-variables: write needs: [deploy-apps, get-current-version] if: ${{ needs.deploy-apps.result == 'success' }} steps: - name: Set GitHub variable for latest deployed apps version run: | - gh variable set LATEST_DEPLOYED_APPS_VERSION "${{ needs.get-current-version.outputs.version }}" --repo ${{ github.repository }} --env yt01 + if ! gh variable set LATEST_DEPLOYED_APPS_VERSION "${{ needs.get-current-version.outputs.version }}" --repo ${{ github.repository }} --env yt01; then + echo "Failed to set GitHub variable for apps version" + exit 1 + fi
13-18: LGTM! Verify the reusable workflow exists.The job configuration looks good, using a reusable workflow to fetch versions with proper environment specification.
Let's verify the referenced workflow file exists:
✅ Verification successful
✓ Reusable workflow exists and is properly referenced
The workflow file
.github/workflows/workflow-get-latest-deployed-versions-from-github.ymlexists and is consistently used across multiple environments (staging, yt01, prod), indicating proper reuse of the workflow.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the reusable workflow file exists if ! [ -f .github/workflows/workflow-get-latest-deployed-versions-from-github.yml ]; then echo "Error: Referenced workflow file does not exist" exit 1 fiLength of output: 84
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try using fd to search for the workflow file fd "workflow-get-latest-deployed-versions-from-github.yml" .github/workflows/ # Also check with ripgrep to find any references to this workflow rg -l "workflow-get-latest-deployed-versions-from-github" .github/workflows/Length of output: 328
.github/workflows/ci-cd-staging.yml (4)
13-18: LGTM: Well-structured version retrieval job.The job correctly uses a reusable workflow to fetch deployed versions and provides them as outputs for downstream jobs.
21-25: LGTM: Proper version comparison setup.The job correctly uses the retrieved version SHAs to compare changes against the actual deployed versions, improving the accuracy of change detection.
49-58: Add required permissions for GitHub CLI operation.The job is missing required permissions to set GitHub variables.
Add the following permission block to the job:
store-infra-version: name: Store Latest Deployed Infra Version as GitHub Variable runs-on: ubuntu-latest needs: [deploy-infra, get-current-version] if: ${{ needs.deploy-infra.result == 'success' }} + permissions: + repository-variables: write steps: - name: Set GitHub variable for latest deployed infra version
59-69: LGTM: Job position change maintains workflow integrity.The publish job's repositioning doesn't affect its functionality, and all dependencies are correctly maintained.
.github/workflows/ci-cd-prod.yml (2)
21-25: LGTM! Well-structured dependency and version comparison.The changes correctly establish the dependency on version retrieval and properly utilize the version SHAs for change detection.
68-77: Previous review comments are still applicable.The implementation needs the same improvements mentioned in the previous review regarding permissions and error handling.
.github/workflows/workflow-get-latest-deployed-versions-from-github.yml
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
.github/workflows/workflow-get-latest-deployed-versions-from-github.yml
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/ci-cd-pull-request.yml (1)
8-51: Consider adding cleanup job.The workflow sets mock versions but doesn't clean them up after testing. This could potentially affect subsequent workflow runs.
Consider adding a cleanup job that runs even if previous steps fail:
cleanup-mock-versions: name: Cleanup Mock Versions if: always() needs: [echo-verified-versions] runs-on: ubuntu-latest permissions: variables: write steps: - name: Remove Mock Variables run: | gh variable delete LATEST_DEPLOYED_INFRA_VERSION --repo ${{ github.repository }} --env test gh variable delete LATEST_DEPLOYED_APPS_VERSION --repo ${{ github.repository }} --env test
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
.github/workflows/ci-cd-pull-request.yml (2)
18-18: Remove trailing whitespace.There is trailing whitespace on line 18.
- +🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 18-18: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
Line range hint
1-3: Add workflow documentation.Consider adding a comment block at the top of the workflow to explain:
- The purpose of this mock deployment workflow
- Why it's needed for pull requests
- How it relates to the actual deployment process
name: CI/CD Pull Request +# This workflow simulates the deployment process in pull requests by: +# 1. Retrieving the latest deployed versions from GitHub variables +# 2. Performing a mock deployment with test versions +# 3. Verifying the version storage and retrieval mechanism +# This ensures the version tracking system works correctly without actual deployments. + on: pull_request: branches: [main]🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 18-18: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
.github/workflows/workflow-get-latest-deployed-versions-from-github.yml (1)
1-2: Consider adding workflow documentation.Since this workflow plays a crucial role in version management and is a prerequisite for the check-for-changes job, consider adding a comment block at the top of the file explaining:
- The workflow's role in the broader CI/CD process
- How it integrates with other workflows
- The format and significance of the version variables it retrieves
Example:
# This reusable workflow retrieves the latest deployed versions of infrastructure and applications # from GitHub Variables. It's used as a prerequisite for the check-for-changes job to determine # what needs to be deployed. # # Integration: # 1. Called by ci-cd-*.yml workflows before the check-for-changes job # 2. Retrieves LATEST_DEPLOYED_*_VERSION variables set during previous deployments # 3. Outputs the corresponding git SHAs for version comparison.github/workflows/ci-cd-yt01.yml (1)
13-20: Add explicit permissions for GitHub token.While the job structure is good, it's recommended to explicitly define the required permissions for the GitHub token to follow the principle of least privilege.
Add these permissions to the reusable workflow:
get-versions-from-github: name: Get Latest Deployed Versions from GitHub Variables + permissions: + repository-variables: read uses: ./.github/workflows/workflow-get-latest-deployed-versions-from-github.yml.github/workflows/ci-cd-staging.yml (1)
Line range hint
13-107: Well-structured version management implementation.The workflow changes successfully implement version tracking and comparison by:
- Retrieving previous versions at the start
- Using these versions for change detection
- Storing new versions after successful deployments
This creates a robust version management system that ensures proper tracking of deployed versions across environments.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- .github/workflows/ci-cd-prod.yml (3 hunks)
- .github/workflows/ci-cd-pull-request.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/ci-cd-staging.yml (3 hunks)
- .github/workflows/ci-cd-yt01.yml (3 hunks)
- .github/workflows/workflow-get-latest-deployed-versions-from-github.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
.github/workflows/ci-cd-pull-request.yml
[error] 18-18: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
🪛 actionlint
.github/workflows/workflow-get-latest-deployed-versions-from-github.yml
39-39: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:168: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
44-44: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:20: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
50-50: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:167: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
55-55: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:20: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
🔇 Additional comments (12)
.github/workflows/workflow-get-latest-deployed-versions-from-github.yml (1)
21-36: LGTM! Well-structured job setup.The job configuration is correct with proper environment setup and full history checkout, which is necessary for version retrieval.
.github/workflows/ci-cd-yt01.yml (4)
22-27: LGTM! Well-structured version comparison.The changes correctly implement version comparison by using the SHA outputs from the previous deployed versions.
62-73:⚠️ Potential issueAdd error handling for GitHub CLI operation.
The GitHub CLI command should include error handling to ensure the version is set correctly.
Line range hint
8-9: Verify concurrency group configuration.The current concurrency group
${{ github.workflow }}-${{ github.ref_name }}is good for preventing parallel runs of the same workflow on the same ref. However, since this workflow updates shared GitHub variables, consider if you need additional concurrency groups to prevent race conditions with other workflows that might update the same variables.#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all workflows that might update the same GitHub variables # to identify potential race conditions. echo "Searching for workflows that update LATEST_DEPLOYED_INFRA_VERSION or LATEST_DEPLOYED_APPS_VERSION..." rg --type yaml 'LATEST_DEPLOYED_(INFRA|APPS)_VERSION' .github/workflows/
98-109: Verify consistent implementation across version storage operations.This job has the same structure as
store-infra-version. Let's verify if there are other version storage operations that need similar improvements.✅ Verification successful
Consistent implementation confirmed across version storage operations
The search results show that the version storage pattern is consistently implemented across all CI/CD workflows:
- All environments (staging, yt01, prod, test) use the same pattern
- Both infrastructure and application version storage follow identical implementation
- The pattern is also consistently used in the workflow for retrieving versions
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all GitHub variable set operations in workflow files # to ensure consistent implementation across the codebase. echo "Searching for GitHub variable set operations in workflow files..." rg --type yaml 'gh variable set' .github/workflows/Length of output: 2288
.github/workflows/ci-cd-staging.yml (5)
23-23: LGTM! Proper version comparison setup.The job correctly uses the retrieved version SHAs to compare changes against previously deployed versions.
Also applies to: 25-27
51-62: Add required permissions for GitHub variables.The job is missing required permissions to set GitHub variables, as noted in previous reviews.
63-73: LGTM! Proper job configuration.The publish job is correctly configured with appropriate dependencies and conditions.
96-107: Add required permissions for GitHub variables.The job is missing required permissions to set GitHub variables, as noted in previous reviews.
13-20: LGTM! Verify workflow file exists.The new job correctly retrieves deployed versions from GitHub variables using a reusable workflow.
Let's verify the referenced workflow file exists:
✅ Verification successful
✓ Workflow file exists and is properly referenced
The reusable workflow file
.github/workflows/workflow-get-latest-deployed-versions-from-github.ymlexists in the repository and is correctly referenced in the staging CI/CD workflow.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the reusable workflow file exists test -f .github/workflows/workflow-get-latest-deployed-versions-from-github.yml || echo "Missing workflow file"Length of output: 81
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try using fd to search for the workflow file with a more flexible pattern fd "workflow.*deployed.*versions.*github.*yml" .github/workflows/ # Also list all workflow files to see if it might have a different name fd ".*\.ya?ml" .github/workflows/ # Use ripgrep to find any references to this workflow in other files rg -l "workflow-get-latest-deployed-versions-from-github"Length of output: 1334
.github/workflows/ci-cd-prod.yml (2)
22-27: LGTM! Changes align with PR objectives.The modifications correctly integrate version checking against previously deployed versions, improving the reliability of change detection.
Line range hint
13-141: Verify the workflow's version management integration.The workflow changes successfully implement version tracking and comparison, but please verify:
- The reusable workflow
.github/workflows/workflow-get-latest-deployed-versions-from-github.ymlproperly handles version retrieval failures- The version comparison in
.github/workflows/workflow-check-for-changes.ymlcorrectly uses the retrieved versions✅ Verification successful
Version management integration is properly implemented
The workflow implementation shows robust version management with proper error handling:
The version retrieval workflow (
workflow-get-latest-deployed-versions-from-github.yml) includes:
- Fallback handling with empty string when variables don't exist
- Proper SHA resolution from version tags
- Clear output definitions for both infra and apps versions
The version comparison workflow (
workflow-check-for-changes.yml) correctly:
- Uses the retrieved SHAs as base references for change detection
- Implements granular file change detection for different components
- Properly propagates change detection results through outputs
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and content of dependent workflows # Check if the required workflow files exist echo "Checking for required workflow files..." for workflow in "workflow-get-latest-deployed-versions-from-github.yml" "workflow-check-for-changes.yml"; do if ! [ -f ".github/workflows/$workflow" ]; then echo "Missing required workflow: $workflow" exit 1 fi done # Check version comparison logic in check-for-changes workflow echo "Checking version comparison implementation..." rg -A 5 "infra_version_sha|apps_version_sha" .github/workflows/workflow-check-for-changes.ymlLength of output: 646
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's examine the content of both workflows to understand their implementation echo "=== Content of workflow-get-latest-deployed-versions-from-github.yml ===" cat .github/workflows/workflow-get-latest-deployed-versions-from-github.yml echo -e "\n=== Content of workflow-check-for-changes.yml ===" cat .github/workflows/workflow-check-for-changes.ymlLength of output: 5498
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/workflow-get-latest-deployed-version-info-from-github.yml (1)
32-35: Add a comment explaining the fetch-depth requirement.
The fetch-depth: 0 is correctly set to ensure full git history for version lookups, but it would be helpful to document this requirement.
- name: Checkout repository
uses: actions/checkout@v4
with:
+ # Fetch full history for git rev-list operations
fetch-depth: 0.github/workflows/ci-cd-yt01.yml (1)
Workflow structure has missing referenced files
The verification revealed that some workflow files referenced in the CI/CD workflow are missing from the repository:
workflow-deploy-function.ymlworkflow-run-k6-tests.ymlworkflow-send-ci-cd-status-slack-message.yml
These files are referenced in the workflow but not present in the .github/workflows/ directory, which will cause the workflow to fail when these jobs are triggered.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint 1-109: Verify workflow structure and dependencies.
The workflow structure looks good with proper job dependencies and version management integration. Let's verify there are no circular dependencies or missing workflow files.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify workflow structure and dependencies
# Check if all referenced workflow files exist
echo "Checking referenced workflow files..."
for workflow in \
"workflow-get-latest-deployed-version-info-from-github.yml" \
"workflow-check-for-changes.yml" \
"workflow-get-current-version.yml" \
"workflow-publish.yml" \
"workflow-deploy-infra.yml" \
"workflow-deploy-apps.yml" \
"workflow-deploy-function.yml" \
"workflow-run-k6-tests.yml" \
"workflow-send-ci-cd-status-slack-message.yml"
do
if [ ! -f ".github/workflows/$workflow" ]; then
echo "Missing workflow file: $workflow"
exit 1
fi
done
# Check for potential circular dependencies in workflow calls
echo "Checking for circular dependencies..."
rg -l "uses: \\./.github/workflows/" .github/workflows/ | while read -r file; do
echo "Analyzing: $file"
rg --no-filename "uses: \\./.github/workflows/([^'\"]+)" -or '$1' "$file"
done
Length of output: 7763
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- .github/workflows/ci-cd-prod.yml (3 hunks)
- .github/workflows/ci-cd-staging.yml (3 hunks)
- .github/workflows/ci-cd-yt01.yml (3 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dispatch-apps.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/workflow-get-latest-deployed-version-info-from-github.yml (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/dispatch-apps.yml
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint
.github/workflows/workflow-get-latest-deployed-version-info-from-github.yml
40-40: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:20: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
47-47: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:20: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
🔇 Additional comments (13)
.github/workflows/workflow-get-latest-deployed-version-info-from-github.yml (2)
1-20: LGTM! Well-structured workflow definition.
The workflow metadata is well-organized with clear input validation, proper secret handling, and well-documented outputs.
1-49: Verify workflow integration in CI/CD configurations.
The workflow appears to be referenced by multiple CI/CD workflows. Let's verify the integration is consistent across all environments.
✅ Verification successful
Workflow integration is properly configured across all environments
The verification confirms that the workflow is correctly referenced in all expected CI/CD configurations:
ci-cd-prod.yml: Uses correct environment "prod"ci-cd-staging.yml: Uses correct environment "staging"ci-cd-yt01.yml: Uses correct environment "yt01"
Each configuration properly provides the required inputs (environment) and secrets (GH_TOKEN) as specified in the workflow definition.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify workflow integration in CI/CD configurations
# Expected: Find references to this workflow in CI/CD files with correct inputs
echo "Checking workflow references in CI/CD configurations..."
rg -A 5 "workflow-get-latest-deployed-version-info-from-github" .github/workflows/ci-cd-*.yml
Length of output: 1624
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
40-40: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:20: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
47-47: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:20: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
.github/workflows/ci-cd-yt01.yml (1)
22-27: LGTM! Well-structured dependency chain.
The changes correctly integrate version comparison by using the SHA outputs from the get-versions-from-github job.
.github/workflows/ci-cd-staging.yml (5)
13-20: LGTM! Well-structured version fetching job.
The job correctly uses a reusable workflow with appropriate parameters and secrets for GitHub API operations.
23-23: LGTM! Proper version comparison setup.
The job correctly depends on and utilizes the version information from get-versions-from-github, enabling accurate change detection against the previously deployed version.
Also applies to: 25-27
51-62: Add required permissions for GitHub variable operations.
The job correctly stores the infrastructure version but is missing required permissions to set GitHub variables, as noted in a previous review.
63-73: LGTM! Well-structured publish job.
The job correctly uses a reusable workflow with appropriate dependencies, conditions, and version information.
96-107:
Add required permissions and repository parameter.
Two issues need to be addressed:
- Missing required permissions to set GitHub variables, as noted in a previous review.
- The
gh variable setcommand is missing the--repoparameter, unlike the infra version job.
Add the repository parameter to the command:
- gh variable set LATEST_DEPLOYED_APPS_VERSION --body "${{ needs.get-current-version.outputs.version }}" --env staging
+ gh variable set LATEST_DEPLOYED_APPS_VERSION --body "${{ needs.get-current-version.outputs.version }}" --env staging --repo ${{ github.repository }}.github/workflows/ci-cd-prod.yml (5)
13-20: LGTM with previous suggestions applied!
The job is correctly positioned as a prerequisite for the check-for-changes job, ensuring proper version comparison. Please implement the permissions improvements suggested in the previous review.
23-27: LGTM! Proper integration with version comparison.
The changes correctly integrate version comparison by:
- Adding dependency on get-versions-from-github
- Using the version SHA outputs for comparison
70-81: LGTM with previous suggestions applied!
The job is correctly positioned to run after successful infrastructure deployment. Please implement the error handling and permissions improvements suggested in the previous review.
130-141: LGTM with previous suggestions applied!
The job is correctly positioned to run after successful application deployment. Please implement the error handling and permissions improvements suggested in the previous review.
Line range hint 13-141: Verify the complete workflow execution.
The changes establish a robust version management system. Let's verify the workflow execution order and dependencies:
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the workflow dependencies further by checking the conditions and outputs usage.
Workflow execution order and dependencies are properly configured
The verification confirms:
- All referenced reusable workflows exist
- No circular dependencies are present
- Job dependencies follow a logical order:
- Infrastructure deployment depends on version checks and change detection
- App deployment depends on infrastructure deployment
- Version storage jobs correctly depend on their respective deployment jobs
- Conditional execution is properly handled:
- Changes are deployed only when relevant changes are detected or on manual trigger
- Version storage only occurs after successful deployments
- Output references are valid and consistently used across jobs
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify workflow dependencies and job execution order
# Test 1: Check if the workflow file syntax is valid
echo "Validating workflow syntax..."
if ! gh workflow view "ci-cd-prod.yml" &>/dev/null; then
echo "Error: Invalid workflow syntax"
exit 1
fi
# Test 2: Check for circular dependencies
echo "Checking for circular dependencies..."
rg -A 1 "needs:" .github/workflows/ci-cd-prod.yml
# Test 3: Verify reusable workflow references
echo "Verifying reusable workflow references..."
for workflow in "workflow-get-latest-deployed-version-info-from-github.yml" "workflow-check-for-changes.yml" "workflow-deploy-infra.yml" "workflow-deploy-apps.yml"; do
if ! [ -f ".github/workflows/$workflow" ]; then
echo "Error: Referenced workflow $workflow not found"
exit 1
fi
done
Length of output: 2348
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for output references and conditional dependencies
echo "Checking output references..."
rg "outputs\." .github/workflows/ci-cd-prod.yml
echo -e "\nChecking conditional job execution..."
rg "if: " .github/workflows/ci-cd-prod.yml
Length of output: 3031
.github/workflows/workflow-get-latest-deployed-version-info-from-github.yml
Show resolved
Hide resolved
.github/workflows/workflow-get-latest-deployed-version-info-from-github.yml
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
@coderabbitai resume |
✅ Actions performedReviews resumed. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
.github/workflows/ci-cd-pull-request.yml (1)
49-49: LGTM! Consider documenting the semantic change.The condition update aligns with the previous change and maintains workflow consistency.
Consider adding a comment in the workflow files or documentation to explain the semantic difference between
hasInfraChangesand the previoushasAzureChangesfor future maintainers.dry-run-deploy-infra: name: Dry run deploy infrastructure + # Note: hasInfraChanges replaces hasAzureChanges to better represent infrastructure change detection uses: ./.github/workflows/workflow-deploy-infra.yml.github/workflows/ci-cd-staging.yml (1)
Line range hint
13-107: Consider documenting the version management strategy.The workflow implements a sophisticated version management system with multiple storage and retrieval operations. Consider adding workflow-level documentation explaining:
- The purpose and flow of version management
- When and how versions are updated
- The relationship between infrastructure and application versions
- The impact on deployment decisions
This would help future maintainers understand the version management strategy.
.github/workflows/ci-cd-prod.yml (1)
Line range hint
13-141: Consider adding workflow documentation.The workflow changes introduce sophisticated version tracking and comparison. Consider adding documentation to:
- Explain the version tracking strategy
- Document the GitHub variables being used
- Describe the deployment conditions and their implications
This documentation could be added either:
- As comments in the workflow file
- In the repository's docs directory
- In a separate PR to the Altinn Studio documentation
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 32-32: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
.github/workflows/ci-cd-main.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/ci-cd-prod.yml(4 hunks).github/workflows/ci-cd-pull-request.yml(2 hunks).github/workflows/ci-cd-staging.yml(3 hunks).github/workflows/ci-cd-yt01.yml(5 hunks).github/workflows/workflow-check-for-changes.yml(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
.github/workflows/ci-cd-yt01.yml (1)
Learnt from: arealmaas
PR: digdir/dialogporten#1346
File: .github/workflows/ci-cd-yt01.yml:98-109
Timestamp: 2024-10-29T14:05:09.791Z
Learning: In GitHub Actions workflows, the permission `administration: write` is required to modify repository variables.
🪛 yamllint
.github/workflows/ci-cd-prod.yml
[error] 32-32: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
🪛 actionlint
.github/workflows/ci-cd-yt01.yml
79-79: unexpected end of input while parsing closing ')' of nexted expression (...). expecting ")"
(expression)
129-129: unexpected end of input while parsing closing ')' of nexted expression (...). expecting ")"
(expression)
🔇 Additional comments (20)
.github/workflows/workflow-check-for-changes.yml (5)
5-15: LGTM! Well-structured input parameters.
The new input parameters are properly defined with clear descriptions, appropriate defaults, and correct type specifications.
Line range hint 17-35: LGTM! Clear and consistent output definitions.
The renaming of hasAzureChanges to hasInfraChanges better reflects its purpose, and all outputs are properly mapped to their respective job outputs.
41-46: LGTM! Well-organized job output mappings.
The separation between infrastructure and application change detection is clear and properly implemented through distinct filter steps.
Line range hint 56-82: LGTM! Good separation of infrastructure and application change detection.
The implementation of separate base SHAs for infrastructure and application changes is a good approach for version control and change detection.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 80-80: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
Line range hint 1-82: Verify the workflow usage in dependent workflows.
The changes support checking against previous deployed versions through the new base SHA inputs. Let's verify that the dependent workflows are properly passing these parameters.
✅ Verification successful
Base SHA parameters are correctly used in deployment workflows but missing in some cases
The verification reveals:
- Production, staging, and YT01 deployment workflows correctly use both
infra_base_shaandapps_base_shaparameters - Main, pull request, and release-please workflows don't pass these parameters, which is acceptable as they:
- Don't need to compare against deployed versions
- Are used for CI purposes where comparing against the PR base or main branch is sufficient
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the workflow is properly used in dependent workflows
# Expected: Find calls to this workflow with base SHA parameters
echo "Checking workflow usage in CI/CD workflows..."
rg -l "workflow-check-for-changes.yml" .github/workflows/ | while read -r file; do
echo "=== $file ==="
rg -A 10 "uses: ./.github/workflows/workflow-check-for-changes.yml" "$file"
done
Length of output: 4198
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 80-80: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
.github/workflows/ci-cd-pull-request.yml (1)
31-31: LGTM! Verify consistency across workflows.
The semantic change from hasAzureChanges to hasInfraChanges improves clarity and better represents the actual check being performed.
Let's verify this change is consistent across all workflow files:
✅ Verification successful
Change from hasAzureChanges to hasInfraChanges is correctly implemented and consistent
The verification shows that:
hasInfraChangesis consistently used across all workflow files (ci-cd-pull-request.yml, ci-cd-main.yml, ci-cd-prod.yml, ci-cd-staging.yml, ci-cd-yt01.yml)- No instances of the old
hasAzureChangesremain in any workflow file - The output is properly defined in workflow-check-for-changes.yml and maps to
steps.filter.outputs.azure_any_modified == 'true'
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent usage of hasInfraChanges across workflows
# Expect: All infrastructure-related conditions use hasInfraChanges instead of hasAzureChanges
echo "Checking for any remaining hasAzureChanges in workflow files..."
rg "hasAzureChanges" .github/workflows/
Length of output: 176
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify both the old and new patterns to ensure complete migration
# First, check all workflow files for both patterns
echo "=== Checking all workflow files for both patterns ==="
echo "Files containing 'hasInfraChanges':"
rg "hasInfraChanges" .github/workflows/ -l
echo -e "\nFiles containing infrastructure-related conditions:"
rg "has.*Changes.*true" .github/workflows/ -A 1 -B 1
# Also check the check-for-changes workflow that likely sets these outputs
echo -e "\n=== Checking check-for-changes workflow implementation ==="
fd "check-for-changes" .github/workflows/ --exec cat {}
Length of output: 16920
.github/workflows/ci-cd-yt01.yml (5)
13-20: LGTM with existing suggestions!
The job implementation looks good, pending the permissions update suggested in the previous review.
23-23: LGTM! Proper version comparison setup.
The changes correctly integrate version comparison by using the SHA outputs from the get-versions-from-github job.
Also applies to: 25-27
46-46: LGTM! Improved condition naming.
The condition now uses a more accurate name hasInfraChanges instead of hasAzureChanges.
62-73: LGTM with existing suggestions!
The job implementation looks good, pending the improvements suggested in the previous review regarding permissions, error handling, and timeout.
98-109: LGTM with existing suggestions!
The job implementation looks good, pending the improvements suggested in the previous review regarding permissions, error handling, and timeout.
.github/workflows/ci-cd-main.yml (1)
66-66: Verify consistent usage of hasInfraChanges output.
The change from hasAzureChanges to hasInfraChanges aligns with the standardization effort across workflow files. However, let's verify this change is consistently applied throughout the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Change is consistently applied across all workflow files
The verification results show that:
- No instances of
hasAzureChangesremain in any workflow files hasInfraChangesis consistently used across all CI/CD workflows (main, prod, staging, yt01, pull-request)- The output is properly defined in the
workflow-check-for-changes.ymlfile - The condition patterns are uniform across different environments
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining instances of hasAzureChanges and verify hasInfraChanges usage
echo "Checking for any remaining instances of hasAzureChanges..."
rg "hasAzureChanges" .github/workflows/
echo -e "\nVerifying consistent usage of hasInfraChanges..."
rg "hasInfraChanges" .github/workflows/
Length of output: 1643
.github/workflows/ci-cd-staging.yml (6)
13-20: LGTM! Well-structured version retrieval job.
The new job correctly uses a reusable workflow with proper parameter and secret handling.
23-23: LGTM! Improved version comparison logic.
The job now correctly uses the actual deployed version SHAs from GitHub for comparison, making the change detection more reliable.
Also applies to: 25-27
35-35: LGTM! More semantically accurate condition.
The condition now uses hasInfraChanges instead of hasAzureChanges, better reflecting the actual scope of changes being checked.
51-62: Missing required permissions for GitHub CLI operation.
This issue was previously identified in an earlier review.
63-73: LGTM! Improved job positioning and dependencies.
The publish job's new position and dependencies optimize the workflow execution while maintaining proper change detection.
96-107: Missing required permissions for GitHub CLI operation.
This issue was previously identified in an earlier review.
.github/workflows/ci-cd-prod.yml (2)
23-27: LGTM! Well-structured version comparison implementation.
The changes correctly implement the PR objective of checking against the previous deployed version by:
- Adding dependency on version retrieval
- Using the retrieved version SHAs for comparison
35-35: Verify the impact of condition change from hasAzureChanges to hasInfraChanges.
The condition for infrastructure deployment has been updated. Let's verify this change is consistent across all workflows and doesn't break existing behavior.
Also applies to: 54-54
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can generate the final response as we have sufficient information:
Change from hasAzureChanges to hasInfraChanges is consistent across all workflows
The search results confirm that:
- No instances of
hasAzureChangesexist in any workflow files hasInfraChangesis consistently used across all workflow files (ci-cd-main.yml, ci-cd-pull-request.yml, ci-cd-yt01.yml, ci-cd-staging.yml, ci-cd-prod.yml)- The output variable is properly defined in workflow-check-for-changes.yml and is set based on azure_any_modified flag
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check usage of hasAzureChanges vs hasInfraChanges across workflows
echo "Checking for hasAzureChanges usage:"
rg "hasAzureChanges" .github/workflows/
echo -e "\nChecking for hasInfraChanges usage:"
rg "hasInfraChanges" .github/workflows/
Length of output: 1571
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Description
Related Issue(s)
Verification
Documentation
docs-directory, Altinnpedia or a separate linked PR in altinn-studio-docs., if applicable)Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
check-for-changesjob to better differentiate between infrastructure and application changes.