Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove member with case-sensitive naming conflict #4397

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 12, 2021

Conversation

bdukes
Copy link
Contributor

@bdukes bdukes commented Jan 5, 2021

PortalInfo.PortalId was introduced in DNN 9.7.2, but should have been made private (i.e. should have been an explicit interface implementation), in order to avoid breaking case insensitive languages (e.g. VB.NET)

I'm not sure this is the right solution, since it will be breaking to anyone using the new member for the last three releases (whereas with #4139 we resolved an issue introduced in 9.7.2 in 9.7.3).

PortalInfo.PortalId was introduced in DNN 9.7.2, but should have been
made private (i.e. should have been an explicit interface
implementation), in order to avoid breaking case insensitive languages
(e.g. VB.NET)
Copy link
Contributor

@mitchelsellers mitchelsellers left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Although a breaking change, I think the usage should be limited, but I think the consistency is important so I'm inclined to approve.

Copy link
Contributor

@valadas valadas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me

@valadas valadas added this to the 9.9.0 milestone Jan 12, 2021
@valadas valadas merged commit 6d61d3a into dnnsoftware:develop Jan 12, 2021
@bdukes bdukes deleted the remove-case-sensitive-portalid branch January 12, 2021 20:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants