Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Re-enables IDE protocol v1 support. #3269

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 1, 2024

Conversation

karolz-ms
Copy link
Member

@karolz-ms karolz-ms commented Mar 29, 2024

Corresponding change in DCP will make it tolerate any combination of IDE tooling and app host libraries. That is, DCP will be able to use both old and new-style annotations and will probe the IDE for protocol supported, translating the requests as necessary.

Microsoft Reviewers: Open in CodeFlow

@karolz-ms karolz-ms requested a review from davidfowl March 29, 2024 00:18
@dotnet-issue-labeler dotnet-issue-labeler bot added the area-app-model Issues pertaining to the APIs in Aspire.Hosting, e.g. DistributedApplication label Mar 29, 2024
@karolz-ms
Copy link
Member Author

@mitchdenny meant to ask you for review as well but for some reason GH is not letting me... 😕

@davidfowl
Copy link
Member

@karolz-ms did you try this with public VS? If not I can before merging.

@karolz-ms
Copy link
Member Author

@davidfowl I have not yet. Would very much appreciate a check from you

@davidfowl
Copy link
Member

We need this change in preview 6 right?

@davidfowl davidfowl added the NO-MERGE The PR is not ready for merge yet (see discussion for detailed reasons) label Mar 30, 2024
Copy link
Member

@davidfowl davidfowl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Still exploding

image

@dotnet-policy-service dotnet-policy-service bot added the needs-author-action An issue or pull request that requires more info or actions from the author. label Mar 30, 2024
@davidfowl
Copy link
Member

Is the new DCP in already? Does it handle old pre v1 protocol requests?

@karolz-ms
Copy link
Member Author

This change requires DCP version 0.1.62, which has been stuck in the pipeline since two days ago due to some AzDO issues... 😞

@dotnet-policy-service dotnet-policy-service bot removed the needs-author-action An issue or pull request that requires more info or actions from the author. label Mar 31, 2024
Corresponding change in DCP will make it tolerate any combination of IDE tooling and app host libraries. That is, DCP will be able to use both old and new-style annotations and will probe the IDE for protocol supported, translating the requests as necessary.
@karolz-ms karolz-ms force-pushed the dev/karolz/reenable-ide-v1-protocol branch from 9574cc8 to 8668aca Compare March 31, 2024 23:47
@karolz-ms
Copy link
Member Author

I verified that with the new DCP and VS 2022 17.10.0 Preview 2.0 (NOT IntPreview) the TestShop app still works with this change. So we just need to wait for the DCP insertion and then we can merge.

@karolz-ms
Copy link
Member Author

Verified again this morning with DCP 0.1.62 that was integrated into Aspire main over the weekend, works with publicly available VS 2022 Preview

@eerhardt eerhardt dismissed davidfowl’s stale review April 1, 2024 17:15

Out of date. This now works

@karolz-ms karolz-ms merged commit b7174b6 into main Apr 1, 2024
8 checks passed
@karolz-ms karolz-ms deleted the dev/karolz/reenable-ide-v1-protocol branch April 1, 2024 17:16
@danegsta
Copy link
Member

danegsta commented Apr 4, 2024

/backport to release/8.0

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 4, 2024

Started backporting to release/8.0: https://github.com/dotnet/aspire/actions/runs/8562282218

@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 8, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
area-app-model Issues pertaining to the APIs in Aspire.Hosting, e.g. DistributedApplication NO-MERGE The PR is not ready for merge yet (see discussion for detailed reasons)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants