Update area-owners.md

[danmoseley]

Trivial edit just to start a PR to remind us to fill out the rest of the table when time allows.

cc @adityamandaleeka

[ghost]

Hey @dotnet/aspnet-build, looks like this PR is something you want to take a look at.

[wtgodbe]

FYI - https://github.com/dotnet/aspnetcore/pull/49229/files#r1260001315. We'll see what happens when Components finishes

[danmoseley]

@wtgodbe looks like you're right. @jkoritzinsky I guess this isn't an issue in runtime because you don't have any required checks (?)

anyway, even if it's admins only, I'm tempted to think it's still an improvement.

[wtgodbe]

anyway, even if it's admins only, I'm tempted to think it's still an improvement.

If the goal is to save time, I'm not sure it is, since the question is if you can get a hold of an admin in less time than the CI would normally take. But even if we do still run CI on these PRs, the author still has the option of asking an admin to force-merge it before CI finishes

[jkoritzinsky]

Yes, we don't have required checks yet in dotnet/runtime, partially because of this exact issue (no concept of "required only if requested to run"). Sadly, GitHub's required checks feature (and as a result the auto-merge feature) is quite limited and not particularly flexible.

[danmoseley]

If the goal is to save time, I'm not sure it is, since the question is if you can get a hold of an admin in less time than the CI would normally take.

I was thinking of saving machine time. But yeah, you're right. We can still merge the linting into the regular checks though. Is that just a matter of removing the file type exclusions I added?

[wtgodbe]

I was thinking of saving machine time. But yeah, you're right. We can still merge the linting into the regular checks though. Is that just a matter of removing the file type exclusions I added?

Removing the exclusions you added will stop aspnetcore-ci from ever being skipped (I think it's fine/good to keep the ones you added to quarantined-pr, though). What do you mean by "merge the linting into the regular checks"?

[danmoseley]

What do you mean by "merge the linting into the regular checks"?

I meant, we were as before I touched anything, except that if there's any markdown in the PR the linting runs (previously we had no linting) and is required to pass

[danmoseley]

basically what I just pushed.

[wtgodbe]

Looks good!

[wtgodbe]

Well, maybe not, now the linter isn't running. Maybe you need to add back paths: with a **/*

[danmoseley]

OK seems to be working now.