Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release/8.0] JIT: Extract all side effects of the index in optRemoveRangeCheck #92210

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 18, 2023

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot commented Sep 18, 2023

Backport of #92116 to release/8.0

/cc @jakobbotsch

Customer Impact

The JIT may silently discard some side effects that are part of the 'index' argument of some HW intrinsics.

Testing

Regression test included.

Risk

Low.

optRemoveRangeCheck extracts only GTF_ASG from the bounds check. If the
BOUNDS_CHECK is complex, that results in silently dropping side effects
on the floor (see the example case).

The ideal fix is that we should always extract all side effects from the
index and length operands, however this has large regressions because
the length typically has an ARR_LENGTH that we then extract. This PR
instead has a surgical fix for the problem case that can be backported
to .NET 8. It extracts all side effects from the index, but keeps
extracting only GTF_ASG from the length to get around the issue
mentioned above.

Fix #91862
@dotnet-issue-labeler dotnet-issue-labeler bot added the area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI label Sep 18, 2023
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Sep 18, 2023

Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Backport of #92116 to release/8.0

/cc @jakobbotsch

Customer Impact

Testing

Risk

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

Author: github-actions[bot]
Assignees: -
Labels:

area-CodeGen-coreclr

Milestone: -

Copy link
Member

@jeffschwMSFT jeffschwMSFT left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

approved. once ready this can be merged

@jeffschwMSFT jeffschwMSFT added the Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release label Sep 18, 2023
@jeffschwMSFT jeffschwMSFT added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Sep 18, 2023
@carlossanlop carlossanlop merged commit db172b4 into release/8.0 Sep 18, 2023
@carlossanlop carlossanlop deleted the backport/pr-92116-to-release/8.0 branch September 18, 2023 17:23
@radical radical mentioned this pull request Sep 26, 2023
@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 18, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants