{devel}[GCCcore/10.3.0] Extrae v3.8.3, libdwarf v20210305, libelf v0.8.13

[robert-mijakovic]

(created using eb --new-pr)
Depends on #12977

[robert-mijakovic]

@boegelbot please test @ generoso EB_ARGS="--from-pr 12977"

[boegelbot]

@robert-mijakovic: Request for testing this PR well received on generoso

PR test command 'EB_PR=13055 EB_ARGS="--from-pr 12977" /apps/slurm/default/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_13055 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 17712

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 874553370 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

[robert-mijakovic]

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

[boegelbot]

@robert-mijakovic: Request for testing this PR well received on generoso

PR test command 'EB_PR=13055 EB_ARGS= /apps/slurm/default/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_13055 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 17791

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 880769460 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

[boegelbot]

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
generoso-c1-s-2 - Linux centos linux 8.2.2004, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/b5f8e8c430688ecaf70356c0c628e03e for a full test report.

[maxim-masterov]

Hi! Any updates on this PR? #12977 is already merged.

[boegel]

It seems like there was a sneaky re-release of Extrae 3.8.3 on 2021-11-15 (see https://ftp.tools.bsc.es/extrae/), so I fixed the SHA256 checksum in 7ac359f ...

@robert-mijakovic Do you still have the original source tarball for Extrae (with checksum 32a3d6b01da2c9b8d177d91307d4c04c6db0923ca1d63bfb32768a172af7943b), so we can check what has changed?

[boegel]

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

[boegelbot]

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=13055 EB_ARGS= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_13055 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 7562

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 999652879 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

[boegelbot]

Test report by @boegelbot
FAILED
Build succeeded for 2 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
cns1 - Linux rocky linux 8.4, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/c5174bb16395967bafd9a0595bbc4351 for a full test report.

[boegel]

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
node3148.skitty.os - Linux centos linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz (skylake_avx512), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/5a9c4aebffbac189117e557d829b4bec for a full test report.

[boegel]

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
node3518.doduo.os - Linux RHEL 8.2, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7552 48-Core Processor (zen2), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/95746ce397d34b2b7a4dc0305e11a187 for a full test report.

[boegel]

The original source tarball is available on generoso (that's why the test report failed).

Although the SHA256 checksum is indeed different, there's no difference in the contents after unpacking, so I'll list both SHA256 checksums as valid in the Extra easyconfig...

[boegel]

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

[boegelbot]

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=13055 EB_ARGS= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_13055 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 7563

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 999736324 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

[boegel]

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
node3148.skitty.os - Linux centos linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz (skylake_avx512), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/b5d0008e05954b3b501ef9c76ecdfea5 for a full test report.

[boegelbot]

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
cns1 - Linux rocky linux 8.4, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/6eb91eb0b2612f15ff64d159e048f878 for a full test report.

[boegel]

lgtm

[boegel]

Going in, thanks @robert-mijakovic!