Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

{data,tools}[gompi/2022a] CDO v2.0.6, ecCodes v2.27.0 #16271

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Nov 3, 2022

Conversation

maxim-masterov
Copy link
Collaborator

(created using eb --new-pr)

Co-authored-by: Sam Moors <smoors@users.noreply.github.com>
@smoors
Copy link
Contributor

smoors commented Oct 3, 2022

@boegelbot: please test @ generoso

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@smoors: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=16271 EB_ARGS= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_16271 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 9234

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1265432517 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
FAILED
Build succeeded for 0 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in total)
cns1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/aaa6841988c8d6550393560afc95beca for a full test report.

@smoors
Copy link
Contributor

smoors commented Oct 3, 2022

-- Could NOT find AEC (missing: AEC_LIBRARY AEC_INCLUDE_DIR) 
CMake Error at cmake/ecbuild_log.cmake:190 (message):
  �[1;35mCRITICAL - AEC library was not found.

  AEC (Adaptive Entropy Coding) provides the WMO GRIB CCSDS compression and
  decompression of data.  This is highly recommended from ecCodes >= 2.25.0

  To force the build without it, use -DENABLE_AEC=OFF�[m

@smoors
Copy link
Contributor

smoors commented Oct 3, 2022

Test report by @smoors
FAILED
Build succeeded for 5 out of 7 (2 easyconfigs in total)
node304.hydra.os - Linux CentOS Linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6148 CPU @ 2.40GHz (skylake_avx512), Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/03376e22e4a11947131126026fb6b2cb for a full test report.

@maxim-masterov
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@smoors Added libaec as a dependency

@smoors
Copy link
Contributor

smoors commented Oct 3, 2022

@boegelbot: please test @ generoso

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@smoors: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=16271 EB_ARGS= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_16271 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 9236

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1265702129 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
FAILED
Build succeeded for 1 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in total)
cns2 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/2884ef5b7a0585db0ad5e279ff34e971 for a full test report.

@maxim-masterov
Copy link
Collaborator Author

== 2022-10-03 16:29:38,178 build_log.py:169 ERROR EasyBuild crashed with an error (at easybuild/easybuild-framework/easybuild/base/exceptions.py:124 in __init__): Sanity check failed: sanity check command cdo --version  2>&1 | grep 'CDI library version : 2.0.6' exited with code 1 (output: ) (at easybuild/easybuild-framework/easybuild/framework/easyblock.py:3472 in _sanity_check_step)

@smoors
Copy link
Contributor

smoors commented Nov 3, 2022

@maxim-masterov the sanity check failed for me too because of the missing bzip2 dep for netCDF.
see #16450

after reinstalling netCDF, it worked for me.

let's re-run the test in generoso..

@smoors
Copy link
Contributor

smoors commented Nov 3, 2022

@boegelbot: please test @ generoso

@maxim-masterov
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@smoors I haven't seen this error on my local machines, only in github CI

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@smoors: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=16271 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_16271 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 9424

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1302342728 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in total)
cns1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/8d36eb26527654d28db320534132dbb9 for a full test report.

@smoors
Copy link
Contributor

smoors commented Nov 3, 2022

Test report by @smoors
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in total)
node302.hydra.os - Linux CentOS Linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6148 CPU @ 2.40GHz (skylake_avx512), Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/92d5260b6e2defec6fe27466c3efd3ec for a full test report.

Copy link
Contributor

@smoors smoors left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@smoors smoors added the update label Nov 3, 2022
@smoors smoors added this to the next release (4.6.3?) milestone Nov 3, 2022
@smoors
Copy link
Contributor

smoors commented Nov 3, 2022

Going in, thanks @maxim-masterov!

@smoors smoors merged commit 45b6d66 into easybuilders:develop Nov 3, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants