Provide compiled version of protobuf payload on 1.6.x branch

[MDeLuise]

This PR add the pre-compiled version of the kurapayload.proto.
This PR is the backport of #3801.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #3905 (bf3b055) into release-1.6.x (1ebcfa5) will decrease coverage by 4.20%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head bf3b055 differs from pull request most recent head 0e6e694. Consider uploading reports for the commit 0e6e694 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##             release-1.6.x    #3905      +/-   ##
===================================================
- Coverage            53.97%   49.77%   -4.20%     
- Complexity             876      881       +5     
===================================================
  Files                 1587     1590       +3     
  Lines                31950    36522    +4572     
  Branches              2663     3710    +1047     
===================================================
+ Hits                 17245    18179     +934     
- Misses               13721    17155    +3434     
- Partials               984     1188     +204     

Files	Coverage Δ
...ua/client/gateway/kura/KuraBinaryPayloadCodec.java	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...lient/gateway/kura/KuraBirthCertificateModule.java	61.53% <ø> (ø)
...se/kapua/client/gateway/kura/internal/Metrics.java	95.77% <ø> (ø)
...ua/client/gateway/kura/proto/KuraPayloadProto.java	16.07% <ø> (ø)
...vice/call/message/kura/proto/KuraPayloadProto.java	24.34% <ø> (ø)
.../org/eclipse/kapua/kura/simulator/app/Request.java	50.00% <ø> (ø)
...a/org/eclipse/kapua/kura/simulator/app/Sender.java	80.00% <ø> (ø)
...pua/kura/simulator/app/data/PeriodicGenerator.java	61.40% <ø> (ø)
...ra/simulator/app/data/SimplePeriodicGenerator.java	0.00% <ø> (ø)
.../eclipse/kapua/kura/simulator/payload/Metrics.java	35.71% <ø> (ø)
... and 1 more

... and 6 files with indirect coverage changes

[Coduz]

This code content of this PR has passed the IP Review for PR #3801 with the following IP Review https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/emo-team/iplab/-/issues/9232, so it does not need further review.