fix: query filter in list task endpoint

[Ayush5120]

Fixes #177
Fixes #175

Summary by Sourcery

This pull request addresses a bug in the list tasks endpoint by ensuring that 'user_id' and 'name_prefix' filters are only added to the filter dictionary if they are not None.

• Bug Fixes:
  • Fixed an issue where the 'user_id' and 'name_prefix' filters in the list tasks endpoint were not properly handling None values.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request addresses issue #177 by fixing the query filter in the list task endpoint. The changes ensure that the filters for 'user_id' and 'name_prefix' are only added to the filter dictionary if they are not None, preventing potential errors when these values are missing.

File-Level Changes

Files	Changes
pro_tes/ga4gh/tes/task_runs.py	Improved the robustness of the query filter in the list task endpoint by adding None checks for 'user_id' and 'name_prefix'.

---

Tips

• Trigger a new Sourcery review by commenting @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• You can change your review settings at any time by accessing your dashboard:
  • Enable or disable the Sourcery-generated pull request summary or reviewer's guide;
  • Change the review language;
• You can always contact us if you have any questions or feedback.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @Ayush5120 - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟡 General issues: 1 issue found
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟡 Complexity: 1 issue found

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.}

[uniqueg]

Looks good to me, but before merging: @athith-g - can you please confirm that this PR solves #175 for you?

[athith-g]

It does fix #175 👍

[uniqueg]

That's good to hear. However, linting and tests fail - please check, @Ayush5120 🙏

[uniqueg]

Can you please explain why we are ignoring types?