Only import liteiclink when required #164
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
As liteiclink is only used in the phy implementations of a few Xilinx/AMD FPGAs, it does not make sense that it would be required to build liteeth for any FPGA. Signed-off-by: Matthias Breithaupt <m.breithaupt@vogl-electronic.com>
|
@enjoy-digital sorry to also bug you with this and PR #165 as well, but it would be great if you could check these out as well. |
|
Thanks @m-byte, this is merged. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As liteiclink is only used in the phy implementations of a few Xilinx/AMD FPGAs, it does not make sense that it would be required to build liteeth for any FPGA.