Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fix typos in RUNPATH_FILE description #8397

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 6, 2024
Merged

Fix typos in RUNPATH_FILE description #8397

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
8 changes: 4 additions & 4 deletions docs/reference/configuration/keywords.rst
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -494,11 +494,11 @@ RUNPATH_FILE
------------
.. _runpath_file:

When running workflows based on external scripts it is necessary to 'tell' the
external script in some way or another were all the realisations are located in
When running workflows based on external scripts, it is necessary to 'tell' the
external script where all the realisations are located in
the filesystem. Since the number of realisations can be quite high this will
easily overflow the commandline buffer; the solution which is used is therefore
to let ERT write a regular file which looks like this::
easily overflow the commandline buffer; the solution used is
to let ERT write a regular file. It looks like this::
Comment on lines +500 to +501
Copy link
Contributor

@eivindjahren eivindjahren Aug 6, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
easily overflow the commandline buffer; the solution used is
to let ERT write a regular file. It looks like this::
easily overflow the commandline buffer; the solution is
to let ERT write a file with the following contents::

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Jus a small suggestion :)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks Eivind. I would keep as it is just because I am too lazy to make a rebase on web version of Github :-)


0 /path/to/realization-0 CASE0 iter
1 /path/to/realization-1 CASE1 iter
Expand Down
Loading