-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 335
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Execution Layer Meeting 198 #1163
Comments
Before we add more blobs, imo we must develop a rigorous definition of staking bandwidth requirements to help maximize credible neutrality, especially so we know where the validators can and can’t migrate should a disaster warrant such a migration. https://ethresear.ch/t/wheres-the-home-staking-bandwidth-research/20507 |
EIP-7702 eth rpc schema: ethereum/execution-apis#575 |
Quick update on EIP-7623, it's now more elegant to implement. (h/t @tanishqjasoria) |
I would like to present ethereum/EIPs#8933 EIP-7783 |
The gas costs for BLS precompiles still don't make sense. It looks gas costs for MSM were based on the version without subgroup checks and subgroup checks were added later, made the complexity linear but gas costs remained unchanged. More info in https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/eip-2537-bls12-precompile-discussion-thread/4187/81. |
@lightclient @chfast @Giulio2002, I've added your topics to the agenda 👍 @nerolation could you please share a link to the changes for people to review ahead of the call? @ryanberckmans I've added your topic to the agenda at the end, given it's very open-ended, somewhat more of a CL topic (although it has EL implications) and that we may tangentially get to a similar discussion when covering EIP-7783. Are there specific questions you'd like to bring up on the call? If so, we can try and prioritize them. |
For EIP-7623, you can check out the execution specs PR here: This addresses some rare edge cases where a transaction could run out of gas, but then receive a refund afterward (due to EIP-7623). If the refund had been applied earlier, the transaction wouldn't have run out of gas in the first place. |
worth flagging |
I propose a simplification to the BLS precompiles (EIP-2537): ethereum/EIPs#8945. |
I have a primarily CL-specific question, so I'd schedule this at the end of the call and if we don't have time then we can skip; but if possible I'd like to raise the question of the best structure for the Builder API following the execution layer requests in Pectra (cf. https://github.com/ethereum/builder-specs/pull/101/files#r1778224447) |
Bikeshedding FYI: |
EIP-7782 (slot time) to be discussed with EIP-7783 (gaslimit auto increase) |
This is also probably worth discussing on next week's ACDC as this is mostly a CL change rather than an execution change - although it has execution layer implication |
@benaadams added right after 7783, and then @ralexstokes's point after that 😄 |
Closed in favour of #1177 |
Podcast (audio only) - https://open.spotify.com/episode/7JjR6ygVAWstQ9Bwoj3UC1?si=itspRcAFQuOi4Q2i9JTzNA |
Meeting Info
#allcoredevs
Discord channel shortly before the callAgenda
devnet-4
v1.5.0-alpha.8
devnet-3
updatesThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: